I suppose I exaggerate. Basically for the same reason you mentioned in this post though.In post 473, Thor665 wrote:Sven's case on Vezok is bad, sure, I'll give you that. But how is the case scummy?
Vezok's post here rang aggressively null to me. I gathered that Vezok found Majiffy's posts scummy and intended to vote him. This doesn't really say anything about either Vezok or Majiffy's alignments. The posts being lost in the server crash and Vezok generally being a lurkaderp leads in to me being less than startled at his inability to recall precisely WHAt he wanted to vote majiffy over.In post 473, Thor665 wrote:How do scum lie about a reason and then forget it?
--
Also, Sven felt a bit over the top to me here?
Sven specifically picked out the term "Still scum" from Vezok's ISO, bolded the phrase, and then played it up as if that had more implications than it actually does.
Call it gut to a degree I guess, but this really reads like someone trying to pin the case on the donkey. In this instance the donkey is Vezok and the case is that he scumslipped by blatantly having his hand in the "mislynch majiffy" cookie jar.In post 400, Svenskt Stål wrote: "" alot of strength, vezok backs this strength up with not remembering what sparked it, but still felt the need to revoteStill scum.
chooo chooo
I don't see any progression from Sven here that looks naturally leading into the Vezok read and the case itself reads like someone trying to assign scum motivation to someone doing derp things. Add onto that the fact that Vezok is already a potential wagon today and has been for a while and its just ew.
I don't like it.
Thor: Opinion on Sekai? Im going to go insane if I have to read ffery myself.