Are you being this dense on purpose? You didn't say anything about Mary Magdalene during your initial claim, and then when you claimed a second time, you insisted that you did say something about Mary Magdalene (when you didn't) and acted like that tidbit was important enough to add legitimacy to your claim.
In post 2801, Kazekirimaru wrote: In post 2800, Skullduggery wrote:So your argument here is that I'm intentionally being stupid just to avoid suspicion? I won't speak for you or anyone else, but I'm not going to degrade myself and act like an idiot just to secure a win as any alignment. Fuck you for even suggesting that I'd do such a thing.
Oh, what the fuck ever. I don't want to hear it. There's no such thing as pride in Mafia. Especially as scum.
My pride is more important than an online forum game. Just because you apparently have no shame when you play as Scum doesn't mean you should assume that everyone else feels the same way.
In post 2801, Kazekirimaru wrote: In post 2800, Skullduggery wrote:Where have I intentionally misrepped you? Quote specific posts where I did that. (Here, let me save you some time: You can't because they don't exist.)
In post 2746, Skullduggery wrote:You said you were Shion, you were a VT, and you expressed disappointment/confusion at being just a VT since Shion is apparently one of the main characters.
I do not recall you saying anything about Mary Magdalene.
Lies by omission are a thing.
Cool story, bro. I didn't omit anything. Here, I'll explain this as thoroughly as I possibly can to ensure that there is no confusion.
You initially said you were Shion, you were a VT, and you expressed disappointment/confusion at being just a VT since Shion is apparently one of the main characters. You did not mention Mary Magdalene.
That post was eaten by the server downtime.
Sangres asked what you claimed. I told them that you said you were Shion, you were a VT, and you expressed disappointment/confusion at being just a VT since Shion is apparently one of the main characters.
You voted for me immediately thereafter and accused me of misrepping you.
I laughed at you for this asinine accusation because I did not misrep you and I don't see how a rational human being would actually make such an idiotic logical leap. You're saying that I'm misrepping you because I said you claimed VT when you claimed VT and you didn't mention Mary Magdalene in your initial claim when you didn't mention Mary Magdalene in your initial claim. Now where, oh where, did I misrep you? I have said noting untrue.