goodmorning (2) - burn_209, Luca Blight
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.
The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2014-03-06 01:59:59).[/area]
Although no one would have hammered, Zivel is right, we're still waiting on your outside-burn case on ZivelIn post 453, Zivel wrote:Don't let me go till we get notty's case. I have been waiting for it for days now.
In post 450, serrapaladin wrote:
goodmorning (2) - burn_209, Luca Blight
Zivel (3) - notscience, Not_Mafia, joker443
Not Voting (1) - goodmorning
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.
The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2014-03-06 01:59:59).[/area]
Wow I didn't actually notice how awful this was. With the knowledge that this was literally immediately after I said I thought Luca was scum makes this seem much worse.In post 167, Zivel wrote:So my reads at the moment:
Joker: Scum, I just have a feeling. Putting Burn on L1 feels scum to me and he was quick about it.
Luca: My other strong Mafia read, not really sure why.
I think Burn is town, just a panicked town that got himself to L1 and got angry about it. His logic and quotes are wrong but I think this more due to him not liking L1 not him being Scum.
GM and NotSci I have no idea about, to experienced for me.
Mutt is Town imo, seems to be asking to good a questions and answering them well.
Not_Mafia is town, again not sure why, just have a feeling.
Must say I am enjoying the two and froing between Luca and Burn. Would like to see a bit more pressure on Luca though.
Unvote
Stroll we shallIn post 464, notscience wrote: Now, let's stroll through Zivel's ISO shall we?
Also my first read ever, and has highlighted one of my main motivations at questioning you. Its self defense, you have tried to wagon me three times now, and I have questioned you every time to work out why.In post 464, notscience wrote: 69 attempts to look like providing content while basically just stating the IIoA "oh man in newbies votes fly why is he starting wagons" and just feels like an awkward read- granted, this was in RVS-ish.
In post 464, notscience wrote: 167 Oh look a reads list! Now, let's examine the reasoning behind the rea- wait, what? None? And he isn't even trying to read myself or GM because we're too "experienced," yet he had his vote on me before as a scumread. Does that make sense to anyone?
I asked for some information, like I have for most of the game as you have tried to wagon me several times. You are ambiguous and state guesses as facts. You give very little reasoning behind most of your posts. I did not see this as productive (was changing my town read on you) and called you out on it, you came back with some real information that meant I could put you back in my town box.In post 464, notscience wrote: 231 by me explaining my prior reads it left him feeling "better about my motives" while he avoids saying exactly which motives he feels better about. Awkward, amirite?
I still think Joker is Scum, I think he has followed the wagons happily with little real answers as to why. Has not committed to to many indepth reads and has done nothing to make me feel he is town.In post 464, notscience wrote: 235 "I would say Joker is my strongest scum-feel atm" which is weird, because the ONE VOTE in his ISO was the one he placed on me in RVS. Voteparking while changing reads around seem strange to anyone else?
Lol, and this was the one post I posted that was bullshit and was just posted to see what would happen. God my tells are crap.In post 464, notscience wrote: 379 This is an honest post and it felt good to see it, because here's why. Zivel just said that he will kill GM tonight and use her death as leverage to get my lynch, yet if you remember, I'm the one that A)He's had his vote parked on all game B) Am too "experienced" for him to read and C) He felt "better" about my motives after I shared my thought process a bit. Seems legit, right?
By this point I was a little frustrated. You had started a wagon on me that got me to L1 and had then disappeared for 2 days, just after you had promised me a case. I also have no idea what that means, you were willing to self vote or you were always going to post?In post 464, notscience wrote: Also 458 is so bloodthirsty and desperate it's hilarious it reminds me of early-sakura in 1526
You have also put two people on L1 with little reasoning behind it. You seem like you are in a hurry to get a lynch no matter who, I would rather no lynch than lynch a townie...In post 472, joker443 wrote:Btw I have given reads there just isn't majorly loads to go on day 1
I could be persuaded to policy vote Burn, Rach as well. Both for very little input into the game so far.In post 471, Not_Mafia wrote:The beast has awakened. Not Sci's read seems to be stretching. Personally I have a null read on Zivel outside of his reads list looking burn partnery.
Burn is the best lynch still IMO, both on a scum and policy basis. NotSci, I think the fact that Burn is in his scum meta needs more consideration from you. My vote is parked on him until close to deadline, at which point there a few people I am willing to move to based on who is being wagoned at that point.
UNVOTE: Zivel
VOTE: Burn