Lol! Wrong on all 3 counts. Who says I haven't reevaluated using new evidence? Just because ots evidence you don't have access to doesn't make it not new or credible. If you only knew, you'd be ashamed for ranting "violates site rules". That's truly the funniest part of your speculation!In post 5157, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:This is A: bullshit and B: probably against site rules and C: wrong.In post 5152, Jaqen Hghar wrote:good undisclosed reason to know a boy is scum.
Guys, all joking and claims of tunnels and everything else aside ~ GCBC is scum and this is him as caught scum. Lynch him already.