Left 4 Dead Mafia! (Game Over!)

sekai no ki · Post Post #1725 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:48 am

In post 1724, Aegor wrote:
In post 1723, AngryPidgeon wrote:Who else claimed Boomer other than Vezok?
How on earth is it beneficial to town for me to answer that question? Suffice to say that I have actually been reading the thread closely enough to kno' fo' sho'.

Town.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1726 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:49 am

Because flavor is being used as a reason to clear people (by me, largely) and looking at claims and when they happened could influence my opinion ion the setup and validity of claims.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1727 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:50 am

In post 1725, sekai no ki wrote:
In post 1724, Aegor wrote:
In post 1723, AngryPidgeon wrote:Who else claimed Boomer other than Vezok?
How on earth is it beneficial to town for me to answer that question? Suffice to say that I have actually been reading the thread closely enough to kno' fo' sho'.
Town.

lmao, this is the dumbest read.

sekai no ki · Post Post #1728 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:51 am

^^ not an infomancer.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1729 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:51 am

Because scum players NEVER try to look pro-town by opposing things like claims and all that. Fucking WOW ffery. Get your shit together this game.

sekai no ki · Post Post #1730 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:53 am

In post 1729, AngryPidgeon wrote:Because scum players NEVER try to look pro-town by opposing things like claims and all that. Fucking WOW ffery. Get your shit together this game.

My shit is in order. It took me less than ten seconds to do the modicum of necessary research.

Pull your damn socks up.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1731 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:54 am

Your read on Aegor for that post is terrible.

I dont care whether or not you did the necessary research to figure it out.

Zdenek · Post Post #1732 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:55 am

Unvote

brb

Aegor · Post Post #1733 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:56 am

In post 1726, AngryPidgeon wrote:Because flavor is being used as a reason to clear people (by me, largely) and looking at claims and when they happened could influence my opinion ion the setup and validity of claims.

Then maybe we should not be looking at claims. I would recommend that the following be kept in mind (nothing earth-shattering):
1) At this point, I find it possible that scum have been provided fakeclaims that are absolutely identical to town non-VT roles
2) Duplicates of certain roles seem very likely, but exact duplicates of the flavor roles seem less likely, which means I am uncertain about the number of claims we have because they are all the same claim and it seems like we would have unlikely duplicates

So I would not let the claims influence reads either way, given that the size of the game prohibits confirmation of the role anyway.

sekai no ki · Post Post #1734 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:56 am

In post 1731, AngryPidgeon wrote:Your read on Aegor for that post is terrible.

I dont care whether or not you did the necessary research to figure it out.

you forgot fabricated.

Aegor · Post Post #1735 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:56 am

Also,

Vote SCB, people

vezokpiraka · Post Post #1736 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:59 am

ActionDan claimed Hunter for all those not paying attention.
I have no idea why people immediately assumed his claim is true. If anyone wants to step up for a counterclaim now is the chance.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1737 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:00 am

^ Not necessarily.

Stop trying to bait claims though.

Dan can you get in here and tell me if you are feeling me or not.

BBmolla · Post Post #1738 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:00 am

I don't see why PV's postings make him town but I'll go along with you people.

SCP's reaction to the PV wagon dying was pretty terrible.

VOTE: SCP
Rubicon is also a solid option

Zdenek · Post Post #1739 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:02 am

- Rubicon might be scum for hard defending Aegor, but not Bulbazak. The only reason I can see to defend Aegor like that is because of their interactions. It makes me think that he's faking understanding what was going on.

- GiF is a pretty good bet for scum because of the turn around on Alpa.

- Alpa is still not a bad choice for scum, which is unfortunate considering the above.

- There's always good old RC!

BBmolla · Post Post #1740 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:03 am

I'd be down to lynch ReaperCharlie

BBmolla · Post Post #1741 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:03 am

I don't expect we'd be able to make the wagon appealing enough to get enough people on it though

Zdenek · Post Post #1742 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:04 am

ISOing Rubicon, the defense of Nero Cain that he just made kind of make me not want to lynch him.

Zdenek · Post Post #1743 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:05 am

Vote: GuyInFreezer

Down?

sekai no ki · Post Post #1744 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:05 am

nope.

BBmolla · Post Post #1745 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:05 am

I still think GIF is town unless he's significantly increased his scum game over the past two to three months. (plausible but eh.)

Zdenek · Post Post #1746 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:06 am

In post 1744, sekai no ki wrote:nope.

Vote someone.

PeregrineV · Post Post #1747 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:08 am

Who is SCP?

Falvormeisters of this theme, what are Hunters and Boomers?

Don't think GiF is scum.

sekai no ki · Post Post #1748 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:09 am

In post 1745, BBmolla wrote:I still think GIF is town unless he's significantly increased his scum game over the past two to three months. (plausible but eh.)

don't judge his scum game by Mac's mini. Neither of us had the time to play that game even half-assed.

Mini 1515 would be a much better example of what to expect from scum-GiF.

If that game has anything to do with your townreading me, it's also a red herring.

sekai no ki · Post Post #1749 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:09 am

In post 1746, Zdenek wrote:
In post 1744, sekai no ki wrote:nope.
Vote someone.

VOTE: Mastin