This is simply the least synergistic playerlist I've seen in a long time. I mean, it's absurd when the only person I've played with before is Titus(btw Titus, I'm relying on you to have my back)! Well, no, I might have played with CDB sometime in the long-long past, I don't remember.In post 21, undo wrote:Both of them.
The way I see it: you random voted as is costumary in this stage of the game, presenting a silly - if entirely logical, in my opinion - reason for that (you were lazy and my name is only four letters). That's perfectly normal.In post 24, Freak wrote:now that's an interesting view. what's suspicious about aknowledging my comedy limits?In post 22, undo wrote:Really? You acknowledged Aegor's argument? Now that's a bit suspicious.In post 20, Freak wrote:yeah it's not my best comment. I could have made a better one, but then again...
I see. Thank you for satisfying my curiosity.In post 25, Natirasha wrote:This is simply the least synergistic playerlist I've seen in a long time. I mean, it's absurd when the only person I've played with before is Titus(btw Titus, I'm relying on you to have my back)! Well, no, I might have played with CDB sometime in the long-long past, I don't remember.[/url]In post 21, undo wrote:Both of them.
As to the second comment, reck and I are in the similar situation of having been banned from moderating and reduced to zero experience, forced to run a mini normal.
Objectively worst vote of the game right now.
so this isn't feigned?In post 29, Doc Holliday wrote:I thought Jordan was kidding at first, or maybe newTown, but votehopping like that and feigning forced outrage? Newscum.
Out of RVS on page 2!
Unvote
Vote: Jordan
The Upick that we were both in only just ended.In post 25, Natirasha wrote:I might have played with CDB sometime in the long-long past, I don't remember.
Who? Neither of the reads posted since your last were flippant, they both pretty clearly stated their reasoning.In post 38, ~Jordan` wrote:you're really flippant with reads, huh?
Oh, you're referring to me calling CDB probTown. That was more obvious than I thought.In post 39, Doc Holliday wrote:Who? Neither of the reads posted since your last were flippant, they both pretty clearly stated their reasoning.In post 38, ~Jordan` wrote:you're really flippant with reads, huh?
Explain Jordan townread?In post 42, Natirasha wrote:Doc Holiday CDB Jordan undo all town 85%
This seems odly stilted and a bit self centered to me. Worth a page 2 vote...In post 20, Freak wrote:yeah it's not my best comment. I could have made a better one, but then again...
asking how to look town. Lol... you call that a wall post. wait until page 10 or so. I'll show you a wall.In post 28, Freak wrote:undo, how about this: I agree with him.I wastrying too hard to come up with something to say. And I like to keep my one-liners to a higher standard, so any feedback is appreciated.
And even if I didn't appreciate the comment, I don't see why I should've ignored him as you suggest. He addressed me, and we're trying to build discussion here. Anything now is good discussion in my book (yes, even your wall).
Chainsaw... if that is still a thing.In post 29, Doc Holliday wrote:I thought Jordan was kidding at first, or maybe newTown, but votehopping like that and feigning forced outrage? Newscum.
Out of RVS on page 2!
Unvote
Vote: Jordan
meh. Maybe. Not really sold on this argument. People vote hop a lot early on.In post 31, Doc Holliday wrote:Meant to add reasoning - 416 posts is too many to not have a clue what RVS is, but new enough not to have a solid handle on scum strategy. Going out on a limb, first scum game?
probably true. Don't understand the vote at all. I fail to see what is trying too hard. Undo's post seems reasonable enough.
whatever happened to holding your town reads close to your chest for a while? seems like this game is going poe a little bit too early for my tastes.In post 42, Natirasha wrote:Doc Holiday CDB Jordan undo all town 85%
In post 36, ChannelDelibird wrote:Aegor, your first post did not contain a vote.
Your next post, an hour later, saw you vote for Slandaar (who hadn't yet posted).
The post after that, you made your first 'real-ish' vote.
What happened in between your first and second posts that made you want to vote? Why didn't you vote in your first post? Why, when you did vote, did you vote for Slandaar rather than anyone else?
aren't scum also interested in sorting the good from the bad? why do scum have to thing "more"?In post 40, Doc Holliday wrote:Oh, you're referring to me calling CDB probTown. That was more obvious than I thought.In post 39, Doc Holliday wrote:Who? Neither of the reads posted since your last were flippant, they both pretty clearly stated their reasoning.In post 38, ~Jordan` wrote:you're really flippant with reads, huh?
CDB is putting clear effort into sorting the good from the bad, and right away spotted a cognitive dissonance that I missed. That is not how scum tend to think, their cases tend to be built slowly and carefully, because they have to think about it more.
