NY 172: Another Large Normal (GAME OVER)

[Zdenek]

Vote: ThaD

You haven't posted in the neighborhood QT yet. What's up with that?

Lolz, I'll get on that

In other news I like being out of rvs within 3 live posts. While its sort of forced (what super early day 1 case stuff isn't) I still like rogers better for it.

I'm scum.

Lemme guess: "reaction testing"?

vote: bjc

There you go, now you can call me scum for "taking the bait".

Cool. You are scum.

[Zdenek]

I'm scum.

There is no legitimate purpose to this as Town. bjc is either scum or not worth listening to. Obtuse gambits are anti-Town.

Sticking with talah for now, but this deserves a vote later.

And with Doc Holliday, yeah?

[Mister Rogers]

Welcome ZD.

[Zdenek]

That's even more scumtastic.

Obfuscation is now added to the lack of sincerity.

overstating a tad here

post 20 logic's got an overexplainy vibe

hyperagressive scum? shrug, too early to tell.

vote: Mister Rogers

And 4nx, I presume?

[Zdenek]

Welcome ZD.

Who are you?

[Mister Rogers]

So far, I'm the guy that likes your entrance.

[Zdenek]

I'm scum.

What a peculiar post. No meaning, no purpose, no humour. Everything else in this game thus far is smoke clouding my vision.

Vote: bjc

(Note: Kinda busy today and tomorrow. Home with my family for my birthday. Though I still should have enough access to post and keep up, I won't be able to make more substantive posts until Monday.)

#4

[Mister Rogers]

Dang are you in my head or what!?

[4nxi3ty]

And 4nx, I presume?

hmm?

[Zdenek]

Mister Rogers, Talah and Doc all getting ~into it~ right out of the gate is lovely. Whether they are super-cool town or over-enthusiastic scum remains to be seen, however.

Doc Holliday, I have to say that your 'out of RVS' post was rather disappointing, and unfortunately I am inclined to believe that it was in reaction to my vote. Considering that there wasn't any in-game evidence to be had, I think it would have been more beneficial to wait if talah actually continued doing this later, before making an early accusation. It would have been appropriate as merely a pressure vote, but the post where you leave your vote on talah despite your dislike for the guy that claimed scum indicates that it's actually something serious. Talah may still be scum, I don't know, but I don't see how he/she/puppy would would be more likely to do that as scum than as town.

I can also confirm that talah was not burned by me whatsoever. Rogers, what was it that gave you that impression? Also, why are you so interested in the game? What do you hope to gain from having the link to it?

ThAdmiral, is there any point to your vote on bjc other than to look town?

I think that he (Deas) tends to get over-explanatory as scum, dotting i's and crossing t's where town probably wouldn't.

I think you are completely right about this.

Taleh, is this DV dotting i's and crossing t's?

I really dislike that first sentence and that question about why someone would ask for a link to a game odd.

[Zdenek]

And 4nx, I presume?

hmm?

You attack Mr. Rogers for reasons that suggest that you think that he's hyper-aggressive scum, or whatever phrase you used, but cheapen it by saying that it's too early to tell if that's what he is.

[4nxi3ty]

-_- yawns, wish mister rogers would've reacted to my vote. Roger, what specifically has zdenek posted that mirrors what's in your head?

pedit: cause it is too early to tell, I'm not going to lie just so my reasoning sounds strong, at least in this instance I'm just gonna show how I feel

[Doc Holliday]

Doc Holliday, I have to say that your 'out of RVS' post was rather disappointing, and unfortunately I am inclined to believe that it was in reaction to my vote.

Your vote had nothing to do with it. It looked like a standard "provoke and see how he reacts" thing, to which I couldn't give a crap. I was much more interested in talah. Talah 1) Called for allies 2) Blindly sheeped those allies 3) Reacted badly to a case being made. For early day one, that's a slam dunk case that I'm not going to "wait and see" on.

[Mister Rogers]

Roger, what specifically has zdenek posted that mirrors what's in your head?

1) Doc mudslinging the BJC wagon
2) Yourself fencesitting my vote
3) DV's bad queries/statements

[4nxi3ty]

uhh ahem doc never mudslang the bjc wagon and I never fencesat on anything, explain?

you didn't agree with zdenek on damon gant? I thought it was decent considering damon thinking it was necessary to post something substantive weirded me out.

[Mister Rogers]

Doc Holliday, I have to say that your 'out of RVS' post was rather disappointing, and unfortunately I am inclined to believe that it was in reaction to my vote.

Your vote had nothing to do with it. It looked like a standard "provoke and see how he reacts" thing, to which I couldn't give a crap. I was much more interested in talah. Talah 1) Called for allies 2) Blindly sheeped those allies 3) Reacted badly to a case being made. For early day one, that's a slam dunk case that I'm not going to "wait and see" on.

If Talah is so hot, why did you use the phrase "for now" in reference to her wagon?

[Mister Rogers]

uhh ahem doc never mudslang the bjc wagon and I never fencesat on anything, explain?

you didn't agree with zdenek on damon gant? I thought it was decent considering damon thinking it was necessary to post something substantive weirded me out.

I am using "mudslinging" here meaning throwing fuel on the fire on a bad wagon.

You totally fencesat my vote and ZD pointed it out.

Hmmm, ZD's DG analysis didn't make my notes. Thanks for pointing it out but of course I agree there and specifically how DG is sheeping Pere's logic and not using his own. He also appears to be overjustifying his absence but happy birthday to him anyway.

[4nxi3ty]

oh looked like you were saying doc was against the bjc wagon and mudslinging it.

no, a fencesat would've been if I said something like 'I don't know if he is town or scum' and not placed a vote, I showed which way I was leaning by suggesting you could be hyperaggressive scum and placing a vote.

voteparking here til more people enter the game:

unvote, vote: damon gant

[Mister Rogers]

You voted but showed an expressed lack of conviction while doing it. That is fencesitting your voting.

You are also fencesitting your DG vote here even though I support the vote.

[4nxi3ty]

lack of conviction != fencesitting, neither does wanting to wait to see how other people interact while leaving my vote on the person I am most comfortable with wagoning.

I think you have a slightly zealous understanding of terms like "obfuscation", "opportunistic", "fencesitting", "mudslinging" but I don't think it is alignment related.

[Damon_Gant]

you didn't agree with zdenek on damon gant? I thought it was decent considering damon thinking it was necessary to post something substantive weirded me out.

Hmmm, ZD's DG analysis didn't make my notes. Thanks for pointing it out but of course I agree there and specifically how DG is sheeping Pere's logic and not using his own. He also appears to be overjustifying his absence but happy birthday to him anyway.

You're going to have to excuse me for being stupid here. The only point I see zdenek making about me is "#4", which you'll forgive me if I don't find it to be spectacular analysis. Obviously I'm missing something here so can someone explain it to me? I'll pre-emptively point out that I barely read the post I was supposed to be sheeping. Honestly, there's only so much one can say about a post that says "I'm scum", so it's unsurprising we have similar things to say about it.

And yes, I guess I did overjustify my absence which is turning out not to be so much so anyway thanks to this nifty iPad keyboard I got today. I appreciate the birthday wishes, even if they are laced with poison!

[Mister Rogers]

lack of conviction != fencesitting, neither does wanting to wait to see how other people interact while leaving my vote on the person I am most comfortable with wagoning.

I think you have a slightly zealous understanding of terms like "obfuscation", "opportunistic", "fencesitting", "mudslinging" but I don't think it is alignment related.

Look if you express reservations when you vote it allows you to excuse your behavior using said reservations as an excuse.

I mean everything I say even if it differs from what you think it should mean.

[SnowStorm]

Hi, hello.

Vote: Damon Grant.

You're going to have to excuse me for being stupid here. The only point I see zdenek making about me is "#4", which you'll forgive me if I don't find it to be spectacular analysis. Obviously I'm missing something here so can someone explain it to me? I'll pre-emptively point out that I barely read the post I was supposed to be sheeping. Honestly,

there's only so much one can say about a post that says "I'm scum", so it's unsurprising we have similar things to say about it.

And yes, I guess I did overjustify my absence which is turning out not to be so much so anyway thanks to this nifty iPad keyboard I got today. I appreciate the birthday wishes, even if they are laced with poison!

Why say anything about it even? It looks like you just picked up the easiest thing to comment and base a vote on and didn't even bother to read the posts after it. It looked like posting just for the sake of posting, as if you just wanted to blend in.

The defensive tone of this post also bothers me.

[SnowStorm]

I like Mr. Rogers. I agree with him on Doc and his wagon-happiness; and on 4nxi3ty and his unconvinced votes, they're easy to backtrack and pretty much pointless.

[Zdenek]

The only point I see zdenek making about me is "#4", which you'll forgive me if I don't find it to be spectacular analysis.

That is where you are wrong.