Marvel Avengers Alliance - Game over

Thor665 · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:58 am

@Pere - You're voting Smargaret - why, did that vote come brand new to you and with new info from the flips?
Please.

@TSO - pretty weak reasoning, why do you think Pere leaped with you particularly...and again?
Do you think he's town?

@Antihero - Meh, okay, but I see town make ludicrous connection cases all the time, what's so scummy about it besides lacking logic? It's not like I wouldn't expect BRO to do that sort of case, it seems in line for him, am I missing something?

T S O · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:07 am

In post 775, Thor665 wrote: @TSO - pretty weak reasoning, why do you think Pere leaped with you particularly...and again?

Weak reasoning is hmm. I think his jump is ...wait, it's completely natural, because he's been pushing smargaret since ages.

Am I missing something here?

In post 775, Thor665 wrote:Do you think he's town?

He suspects smargaret, so yes.

This is very simplistic, but you could say I too am very simplistic.

jasonT1981 · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:09 am

Day 3 Vote Count 1

smargaret 2 - T S O,PeregrineV,
Broseiden 2 - AntiHero,Bulbazak,
AntiHero 1 - BROseidon,
PeregrineV 1 - Thor665,

Not Voting

smargaret
Yiley
penguin_alien

with 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch

(expired on 2014-04-02 16:40:08)

till Day 3 Deadline

penguin_alien · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:44 am

BRO, talk to me about Antihero.

BROseidon · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:48 pm

In post 768, T S O wrote:What links Anti to the Yates kill?

The fact that Yates was all over Anti at the end of the last day phase.

BROseidon · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:48 pm

In post 769, Antihero wrote:right, because a universal town read is so far out in left field...

1) He was a universal town read?

2) Why shoot Yates over another universal town read?

BROseidon · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:49 pm

In post 773, Bulbazak wrote:
Vote BROseidon

Still scum.

not enough l's and o's.

BROseidon · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:51 pm

In post 778, penguin_alien wrote:BRO, talk to me about Antihero.

I don't remember anything the slot's done all game, which is bad. Even in a game like this where I'm not super tryharding, I should still have *some* impression of the slot.

I'm going to reread the game soonish to try to get better grounding. I haven't gotten too invested in this one yet.

BROseidon · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:52 pm

My main issue with the Yates kill (and also to a degree with the Porkens kill) is why Thor hasn't been shot yet.

Thor665 · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:02 pm

Let's see...Day 3, yup, right on schedule.

Thor665 · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:04 pm

By Day 3 or so start claiming he is scum for being alive and/or not catching enough scum.

I still can't decide if it's funnier or sadder that I can do these things and know they will happen.
I am amused that I now get to link to them when they do just for lulz though.

BROseidon · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:09 pm

Which explains why I voted for you right out the gate.

Instead of, y'know, town reading you and ascribing other reasons to you not getting shot

PeregrineV · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:33 pm

In post 774, Antihero wrote:
In post 772, PeregrineV wrote:Yes, he mentioned that. Do you think it links you in any way to his death, if you were not you?
what kind of pointless, loaded question is that?

here's peregrine and BRO to deliver the 1-2 punch on deceptive NK analysis

I'm merely pointing out the link. Not sure why you are getting so defensive about it.

PeregrineV · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:41 pm

In post 775, Thor665 wrote:@Pere - You're voting Smargaret - why, did that vote come brand new to you and with new info from the flips?
Please.

Considering I figured Cxin was town and you thought he was scum, your information was updated.

I had Yates as a null read, what was your read on him? Was it updated?

Thor665 · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:38 am

In post 788, PeregrineV wrote:Considering I figured Cxin was town and you thought he was scum, your information was updated.

I had Yates as a null read, what was your read on him? Was it updated?

I had you or him as scum.
I had Yates as town.

Thankfully the flips totally rearranged my world.

PeregrineV · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:20 am

In post 789, Thor665 wrote:
In post 788, PeregrineV wrote:Considering I figured Cxin was town and you thought he was scum, your information was updated.

I had Yates as a null read, what was your read on him? Was it updated?
I had you or him as scum.
I had Yates as town.

Thankfully the flips totally rearranged my world.

I never got that you considered him town the way you argued with him. Do you state that anywhere?

BROseidon · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:26 am

Thor, y u no reply to me

Thor665 · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:57 pm

In post 790, PeregrineV wrote:I never got that you considered him town the way you argued with him. Do you state that anywhere?

No. Neither do I state him as a scum read except in relation to a Cxin scum flip.
I also always spend a lot of time talking about reads with people without calling them scummy when I'm scumreading hem </sarcasm>

In post 791, BROseidon wrote:Thor, y u no reply to me

Because u jus joke reply, 5o Y botha?

PeregrineV · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:12 pm

In post 792, Thor665 wrote:
In post 790, PeregrineV wrote:I never got that you considered him town the way you argued with him. Do you state that anywhere?
No. Neither do I state him as a scum read except in relation to a Cxin scum flip.
I also always spend a lot of time talking about reads with people without calling them scummy when I'm scumreading hem </sarcasm>

In post 791, BROseidon wrote:Thor, y u no reply to me
Because u jus joke reply, 5o Y botha?

I'll come back to this Monday or Tuesday.

smargaret · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:04 am

In post 771, Antihero wrote:
In post 770, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 768, T S O wrote:What links Anti to the Yates kill?
723 and 726.

But he said they were weak scumreads.
yeah, and carry-over from smudger

who i'm not

so keep creating smokesmokesmoke

This is terrible reasoning. No, you aren't Smudger, but you got the same role pm.

TSO - Gut is a horrible reason to vote someone on Day 3. Horrible.

Why are people voting Broseidon again?

VOTE: Peregrine - but I'm going to reread Antihero/Smudger tonight, because I also don't remember anything particularly memorable out of that slot, and that may change my vote.

Antihero · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:21 am

In post 787, PeregrineV wrote:I'm merely pointing out the link. Not sure why you are getting so defensive about it.

because you're

of

fensive. that's why

smargaret wrote:This is terrible reasoning. No, you aren't Smudger, but you got the same role pm.

i think you're misplacing the burden of proof, marge

so you're agreeing with the nk analysis or not?

jasonT1981 · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:41 am

I am force replacing Yiley. His activity is the main factor in this. This would have been his 3rd prod. Though I operate a 4 in total or 3 in one day rule, there is no evidence Yiley has interest in this game.

penguin_alien · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:23 am

Antihero, do you think that when a slot is replaced none of the previous occupants' previous posts are relevant in reading them?

Antihero · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:38 am

holy shit, what is this, strawman hour?

i point out how stupid it is that NK analysis based on a self-described weak read is stupid and now i'm getting irrelevant questions about ^ this

Antihero · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:39 am

but i guess the scum smoke generator has to keep on going, so whatever