burn_209 (2) - RachMarie, Not_Mafia
With 7 alive, it's 4 to lynch.
The deadline for Day 2 is in (expired on 2014-03-23 22:00:59).[/area]
In post 599, burn_209 wrote:What helpful thing have you done all game? Drop the hammer on a townie? Yea that is super helpful there champ!
In post 599, burn_209 wrote:As for the Zivel thing again he made the wrong call but a lynch had to happen or we all would have been fucked. So him starting that wagon instead of just riding it out and risking a no lynch is town in my opinion.
You're all over the placeIn post 599, burn_209 wrote: Now you can say "burn why didnt you vote for Zivel then?" and my answer to that is because I knew that people were not going to let a no lynch happen and unless some kind of odd circumstance happens I WILL NOT vote for someone who I think is town. It just how I play.
You are tunneling scum stalling us in nonsense talk with your misrepping and shutting down of any pressure on anyone who is not me. You have ignored questions you find inconvenient and twisted what I have said in to any excuse to keep me as your 'scumread'In post 599, burn_209 wrote:Im endless tunneling? lol you have got to be kidding me. I want EVERYONE to look at NM's ISO and tell me this isnt the most hypocritical post you have ever seen.
You say this and then proceed to say I'm scummy later for the pressure I've been putting on people, at the same time calling it weak and shutting it down
What helpful thing have you done all game? Drop the hammer on a townie? Yea that is super helpful there champ!
I have actually been questioning people instead of supporting a wagon on Luca then when it gets reversed on me for the same reason having a ridiculous AtE flip out
Im not shutting anything down and if saying you think Notty is scum because of the GM thing and the Zivel wagon then lol at you for calling that pressure.
"I'm not shutting anything down" proceeds to shut down any pressure on anyone that is not me
He pulled away from the GM wagon once he realized he was wrong. So that right there sounds like you are trying to punish him because he was wrong about GM.
Misrepping my argument, I was pressuring him to start substantiating his wagons
So wanting to lynch someone, which I am assuming you would want to lynch any of your top 3 scumtells, because he was wrong about a call instead of actually doing something scummy screams mafia.
Assume all you want. How about we get some scumreads from you instead of this
Sure Notty started the GM wagon but he was also one of the first ones to jump off and look elsewhere.
I won't point out the obvious and say what you've just implied about yourself
As for the Zivel thing again he made the wrong call but a lynch had to happen or we all would have been fucked.
Contradicting yourself from earlier
So him starting that wagon instead of just riding it out and risking a no lynch is town in my opinion. In fact Id say the majority of people that voted Zivel probably didnt think he was scum but came up with a half assed reason to vote him just so we would avoid a no lynch. Now you can say "burn why didnt you vote for Zivel then?" and my answer to that is because I knew that people were not going to let a no lynch happen and unless some kind of odd circumstance happens I WILL NOT vote for someone who I think is town. It just how I play.
I shouldn't have to explain why this statement is bad
Your case against Luca is weak at best. Ok so what he was suspicious of GM who was NK'ed. That is your basis of your suspicion on him? Because he questioned GM's IC play which was a logical thing to do? Come on guys you have to see that NM is reaching for things and simply bullshitting.
This is you shutting down pressure
His reasons for lynching people are because they were wrong about what they thought people's alignments were and their lack of being helpful towards the town.
Misrepping yet again. Above and below
These are not scumtells, these are just reasons to lynch townies because people like to punish those who are wrong. Dont buy into this crap.
It would be useful to hear another perspective on the game, so if you could update your reads list for us then that would be great.In post 604, joker443 wrote:I've tried asking questions day 1 they just got ignored so now I just say something see what people say
I got the memo you haven't done anything useful, and you have ignored my request that I'm sure I've made now than once.In post 612, RachMarie wrote:Jake did you miss the memo? burn is scum.
This is the most retarded plan I have ever heard. How people are not seeing you as scum is beyond me especially after this "plan" you just made. Two possible mislynches is a heavy price for finding out who just one half of the scum team. You want to lynch the two most town players in this game in Luca and Notty and then me who I know is 100% town and its starting to look like people are coming around to seeing that. Yet you keep forcing the issue. Honestly it reminds me a lot of the last game I played where I did the same thing to Thor and guess what? I was scum.In post 613, Not_Mafia wrote:Roll up Roll up These are the scum, one from column A and one from column B, 2 for the price of one you can't say fairer than that
ARach Burn
BNotSci Luca
NotSci/Luca scumteam ispossiblebut I very much doubt it, It's clear Rach and Burn aren't partners.
Course of action: Lynch Burn or Rach today, if whoever we lynch flips town then we get the other in Lylo, then it comes down to NotSci v Luca in the 3p.
If whoever we get flips scum, we have a mislynch to burn on Luca or NotSci
Because I was an easy mislynch coming into today. Wouldnt take much for people to hop on board (i.e like Rach did) and scum like mislynches that they didnt have to try to hard to get. If you push and make a case for someone to be lynched and you are wrong, then everyone is going to look your way with suspicion. Now if EVERYONE wants someone lynched and the person flips town, then we were all wrong and no one is going to look at anyone with any suspicion. Thats why scum are trying to wagon me.In post 617, notscience wrote:burn's recent posting feels town as fuck.
Why are people trying to wagon him again?
His earlier posts were bad but rach's is worse.In post 617, notscience wrote:burn's recent posting feels town as fuck.
Why are people trying to wagon him again?
And his recent stuffIn post 206, burn_209 wrote:See this post right here is what I was referring to. This is where your vote turned from a bullshit just for fun RVS vote to a an actual ok Im going to keep voting this person as scum. You used THAT reasoning as a reason to keep your vote on me and your reasoning was bullshit. Or at least that is how I interpreted it when I read it so that is what I was referring to. I did not lie, the fact you are trying to stretch what I said into being a lie is ridiculous.In post 92, Luca Blight wrote:As for Burn, his defence of himself is weak to say the least, and his voting of Not_Mafia as GM pointed out was also a bit suspect.
Then you withdraw your vote in 102 right after I challenged you in post right before it. Which either means you were absolutely not confident in your vote or you knew your reasoning for voting me was complete crap and figured to unvote just to appease me and then come back to voting me when you found something better to come after me with.
Then I say you were one of my top scum reads then all hell breaks loose and you go on a rampage about how i lied and a gang of other shit.
Now in all honesty as I write this out and actually take the time to think about it I think I was wrong about you being scum. The more likely scenario in my head is probably that I misinterpreted your first post that I quoted, I did question you about taking your vote off of me and that is still a valid question in mafia so deal with it essentially, then you felt "betrayed" in a way because you took your vote off me to give me a chance and then i responded by attacking you again which led to the tirade. That is the scenario I think mostly happened. But to say I blatantly lied and made a post out of fiction is pretty far stretched.
@Not Mafia -- You can call my vote on you an OMGUS thing if you want but that wouldnt be true. It was in the beginning of the game and my goal with that post was to dig and pry and get some discussion other than "here lets bandwagon this guy just because." You have to start this game somewhere. OMGUS posts are a lot more aggressive and dramatic than what I posted. Your policy lynch call is both scummy and illogical by the way. Scum are always big proponents of policy lynches.
@Mutt -- you are super town....keep up the good work!
As for my self vote post I REFUSE to play another game where I have to scratch and claw to stay alive day phase after day phase on here. It takes the fun out of playing for me. I want to find scum not defend myself with every post just so I can stay alive another day. Then once people peg you as one of the popular scum reads, in my experience, your opinion on things and how you interpret things doesnt mean shit to the other town players. Last game I was mafia so I had to do it to give my teammate a shot, this time I AM TOWN so I dont have to sit here and defend myself every damn post. I can just vote for myself, get hammered, and we lose ONE townie which we probably would have done on day 1 anyway.
In post 613, Not_Mafia wrote:Roll up Roll up These are the scum, one from column A and one from column B, 2 for the price of one you can't say fairer than that
ARach Burn
BNotSci Luca
NotSci/Luca scumteam ispossiblebut I very much doubt it, It's clear Rach and Burn aren't partners.
Course of action: Lynch Burn or Rach today, if whoever we lynch flips town then we get the other in Lylo, then it comes down to NotSci v Luca in the 3p.
If whoever we get flips scum, we have a mislynch to burn on Luca or NotSci
Why should we agree that "either burn or Rach are scum"? What an odd thing to say, there is no way you could know for sure either's alignment, unless you happen to be scum yourself. You've said yourself recently that you suspect everyone but Jake, so to make this assumption contradicts that point. It seems as though you are scattergunning, and as NS did on day 1 are trying to find a wagon wherever one will stick. You started strongly on me on the assumption that because GM was killed I must be scum, and then were quick to jump on Rach and put her on L-1. Personally I feel Burn's recent posts are coming from a Town persepctive, and my read on Rach remains null with a slight scum lean at best, so I would not agree that one of them is 'definitely scum'. In fact, in a recent post you didn't even have Rach in your top three scum reads, which further renders your post absurd and contradictory.In post 621, Not_Mafia wrote:Can we at least agree that one of Burn and Rach are scum. I'm on board for a lynch on either, I don't really like Rach's reponse to Jake but I'm still leaning towards Burn.
We've discussed the above post quite a bit but Burn was fine voting for Luca on the same reasoning that the Burn wagon ended up starting, then when the wagon came on him he began his massive tantrum, if someone is constantly having to "scratch and claw to stay alive" as town you'd think they'd learn not to flip out and over react over and over again, especially over a wagon based on logic that they supported.