oh looks like we need to have another talk. sit down....In post 697, burn_209 wrote:You got to be kidding me....
can you tell me where you came up with this thought process about ICs?In post 269, Luca Blight wrote:I thought the reason she gave for being cautious due to being an IC was weak and a bit of a cop-out. I still think if an IC is Town they would make more of an effort to influence proceedings, she has had no impact at all and her reads have had poor reasoning behind them - for example saying she thinks I'm town but my reads are 'too convenient', for a start that is sitting on the fence, and also she has provided no explanation why my reads are too convenient. The fact I have her as null isn't for convenience, it's because she has done nothing to make me think she could be one or the other.
Why have you suddenly come to that conclusion? I remember not long ago you expressed your opinion that either one of me or burn were scum, but were definitely not scum partners. Just another example of your fickle opinions. Also interesting how you came to that opinion from a burn post, but choose instead to put me on L-1, with no other explanation.In post 693, Not_Mafia wrote:Luca/Burn scumteam looking really possible currentlyIn post 692, burn_209 wrote:Well for one it will give you guys a for sure alignment read for me because I know I was viewed as scummy on day 1 and then was viewed as town for the majority of this day.
When I flip town what then? Are you saying that will make you conf scum?
For some this might be confusing and it would give a good assessment as far as that goes. It would help on peoples read on Luca as well because NM came out the gate voting for Luca and it seemed to piss Luca off which is understandable because it was pretty clear that the NK was a frame job.
Why is this pretty clear, you seem to think we shouldn't even be exploring the possibility of it not being a frame
Those are two people right there that could be considered iffy (eventhough Im pretty sure Luca is town and I know I am town.) I personally think my scumtells on NM are pretty solid. They are a hell of a lot better than voting for someone because they are lurking or because someone just so happened to be on the wagon of the person that was NK'ed.
Misrepping people's cases
Jake why did you flip your vote to Luca? Its kind odd that you just switched your vote with no reasoing at all and out of nowhere after seeming like you really wanted Rach to be the lynch.
Untrue, he just stated he thought Luca killed GM
Jake probably wont help the NM wagon because that is his buddy but Notty, Rach, Joker, Luca Im telling you NM is scum. You have to consider the case I built on him as it is better than any of the crap people have brought up like Luca and Rach. We have 3 days left which means we have to start to move on what we want to do. Luca is NOT the person we want to lynch today.
Playing for towncred
VOTE: Luca
Idc about the flurry of overdramatic posts that about to come my way from Luca and Burn now. Come at me.
It's my opinion, and something I used to draw GM (who hadn't posted anything up until that point) into the game.In post 701, Jake from State Farm wrote:can you tell me where you came up with this thought process about ICs?In post 269, Luca Blight wrote:I thought the reason she gave for being cautious due to being an IC was weak and a bit of a cop-out. I still think if an IC is Town they would make more of an effort to influence proceedings, she has had no impact at all and her reads have had poor reasoning behind them - for example saying she thinks I'm town but my reads are 'too convenient', for a start that is sitting on the fence, and also she has provided no explanation why my reads are too convenient. The fact I have her as null isn't for convenience, it's because she has done nothing to make me think she could be one or the other.
Firstly I'm male, secondly I find it ironic how you slate my case on NM when you have voted for me without any sort of case at all. NM's current case against me seems to be based on the fact that burn is defending me, which doesn't really make sense either. Both you and NM seemed dead set on either burn or Rach, but when your accusations there failed to stick you changed your vote to me, and NM followed. The best you can find on me is some irrelevant IC theory stuff posted early into the game.In post 714, Jake from State Farm wrote:1. I am not scum
2. I did not switch to Luca "really close to deadline"
3. I wouldn't even consider 2 days ( today ) "really close to deadline"
4. You have no case on NM
5. I don't even think luca's case on nm is any good
6. Begging others to vote with you without actually talking to them and trying to convince them just sounds desperate. Why are you so desperate to save Luca anyway? The reasons you gave for town reading her are weak
In post 607, joker443 wrote:Ok Lucas here's what i think
Rach number 1 scum read right now, lurking around a lot, doesn't seem to say a lot at all I think more just to dodge, hasn't done anything to help town really..my vote staying with her
Lucas he has good points but some do sound a bit dodgy so he's 50 50 to me does have a lot of rubbish quite a lot though and after the argument with Gm made me rather suspicious of him but could as just be someone trying to frame him
Jake only just joined plus guy before I didn't really have any suspicions on so more town
Burn thought he was scummy through most of the game not to sure now so another 50 50
NM pretty sure he's town very good towards getting what he needs to know/say
Not sci same as above tbh