That's not the same as being the person who suggested it. I'm not sure how much I care about that though, since I think Sekai looks worse there than you.In post 3001, pidgey wrote:Ho ahead and look for more stupid shit in my iso, but noted that you ignore majiffy (who is now voting me lol) saying that it was a likely possibility.
Maybe so. My initial reaction was that PV's claim looked odd due to his putting his early vote somewhere else, but bbmolla's reaction to PV and his ongoing posts after that made me think that he was more likely town than PV was. And I felt like my interpretation of Mastin's reaction on day 2 might be naive. I've made mistakes in a few games recently by thinking too simplistically.In post 2983, Zdenek wrote:If BB and Pere are both town, the worst reaction to the contradicting claims was Sekai No Ki's.
Bring it awwwwwn beyotch.In post 3008, pidgey wrote:I'll 1 on 1 this fucking scumbo right now lol
#ScumflailIn post 3008, pidgey wrote: The reasons he calls my reaction and my gameplay regarding PV are laughable and anyone can fucking put that case together in a second, doesnt mean that anything he points out is scummy per se. All his play has been bullshit.
It's a stretch to say I agreed with you.In post 3008, pidgey wrote:Love how he agrees with me yesterday that PV might be a lyncher
It's not your disagreement at all. It's how you approached it, why you're towning yourself from it, and your general play this dayphase after the PV townflip.In post 3008, pidgey wrote:and UNTIL FUCKING TODAY he calls me out on me disagreeing with PV's claim thing?
Why would you make this argument as town, this late in the game with so few dead scum?In post 3008, pidgey wrote: Fucking lynch this guy and if he ends up being town hoard kill me or lynch me i dont really care at that point lol im pretty sure he is scum now
A+ Scumposting, will nth scummy nomination.
Basically, they tried to undermine a town read for changing votes quickly on to someone who they agreed should be the lynch.
yeah I'm really apathetic this gameIn post 3013, Majiffy wrote:Your logic is intuitive, introspective, and sound.
And contracted a pigment diseaseIn post 3014, Majiffy wrote:My avatar kinda looks like what your avatar would look like if it became angry and rabid.
In post 2809, sekai no ki wrote:you were pretty quick to vote bbmolla after PV's post.In post 2804, Aegor wrote:VOTE: PV
I want to hear what PV has to say. Then we could decide. Not liking vezok's 2777.
Can we horde Pidgey tonight then?
Not undermine a town read. Reconsider the read in light of his day 4 trajectory around conflicting claims.In post 3015, Zdenek wrote:Ok this is good.
Posts 2793-2802, we have snk questioning bbmolla about his role. Questioning that led them to conclude that bbmolla was useful to the town and that PV should be lynched first.
Post 2804, aegor votes PV.
Post 2809, snk calls out aegor over voting PV. When that's what was in line with their thinking.
On top of that, what did snk have to say about aegor previously?
Basically, they tried to undermine a town read for changing votes quickly on to someone who they agreed should be the lynch.
I'm sold.
Vote: sekai no ki
but it came after your questioning of bbmolla about his role, and aegor came to the same conclusion as you.In post 3018, sekai no ki wrote:This post?
Exactly what it says. I felt like a ton of caution was called for given bbmolla's two previous amnesiac cop results, Aegor's posting looked more reactive and less I dunno - thoughtful than the situation called for.
You're going to need to be way more precise if you expect me to understand what you are getting at here.In post 3020, sekai no ki wrote:Not undermine a town read. Reconsider the read in light of his day 4 trajectory around conflicting claims.
could you bullet why you want to lynch pidgey?
I don't think you understand what it was about Aegor's posting that worried me. It was the weathervane aspect to his play. quick vote on the guy who'd evidently been trusted enough to get two results from a cop, and was instrumental in two scum lynches, and then a poorly telegraphed change when the winds went the other direction.In post 3021, Zdenek wrote:but it came after your questioning of bbmolla about his role, and aegor came to the same conclusion as you.In post 3018, sekai no ki wrote:This post?
Exactly what it says. I felt like a ton of caution was called for given bbmolla's two previous amnesiac cop results, Aegor's posting looked more reactive and less I dunno - thoughtful than the situation called for.
I'm inclined to think that if you really thought that caution was necessary, you'd have asked him to unvote rather than making a snide comment about him being quick to vote bb.
