>Poor playIn post 3023, Zdenek wrote:could you bullet why you want to lynch pidgey?
There was a claim that he was scum, so I don't why you cared that much about this.In post 3024, sekai no ki wrote:quick vote on the guy who'd evidently been trusted enough to get two results from a cop, and was instrumental in two scum lynches
then after the your questioning of bb he came to the same conclusion as you, so this just looks like bs.In post 3024, sekai no ki wrote:and then a poorly telegraphed change when the winds went the other direction.
Mostly Majiffy. Also, I don't know if pieguy agrees (he probably doesn't), but I don't want our slot active anywhere near lylo.In post 3026, Zdenek wrote:There was a claim that he was scum, so I don't why you cared that much about this.In post 3024, sekai no ki wrote:quick vote on the guy who'd evidently been trusted enough to get two results from a cop, and was instrumental in two scum lynchesthen after the your questioning of bb he came to the same conclusion as you, so this just looks like bs.In post 3024, sekai no ki wrote:and then a poorly telegraphed change when the winds went the other direction.
Who do you want to lynch?
where's this?In post 3025, Majiffy wrote:Cog dis
Idk it just sounded nice so I threw it in there.
The trouble is that I don't believe you because based on your responses it seems to me that at least Aegor's vote on PV should have rung true to you, and that's exactly the thing that you called him out for.In post 3029, sekai no ki wrote:Re your other questions, my reads usually have a timing/tone/progression focus. Aegor's posts yesterday hit several off-notes. It was enough to hit my radar, and I wanted it in the game thread for future days.
I've done that with yours.In post 3030, Majiffy wrote:Idk it just sounded nice so I threw it in there.
Pidgey is a fucking scumbutt, go read his goddamn ISO! And go read mine with a ctrl+f on Pidgey! Christ.
I quoted his PV vote, but it's not what I called him out for.In post 3031, Zdenek wrote:The trouble is that I don't believe you because based on your responses it seems to me that at least Aegor's vote on PV should have rung true to you, and that's exactly the thing that you called him out for.In post 3029, sekai no ki wrote:Re your other questions, my reads usually have a timing/tone/progression focus. Aegor's posts yesterday hit several off-notes. It was enough to hit my radar, and I wanted it in the game thread for future days.
You're right. I misspoke. You snidely suggested that your towntowntown read was throwing his vote around when he moved his vote onto someone who you agreed was the correct lynch for the day.In post 3033, sekai no ki wrote:I quoted his PV vote, but it's not what I called him out for.In post 3031, Zdenek wrote:The trouble is that I don't believe you because based on your responses it seems to me that at least Aegor's vote on PV should have rung true to you, and that's exactly the thing that you called him out for.In post 3029, sekai no ki wrote:Re your other questions, my reads usually have a timing/tone/progression focus. Aegor's posts yesterday hit several off-notes. It was enough to hit my radar, and I wanted it in the game thread for future days.
It's like vote timing considerations aren't a thing to you?In post 3034, Zdenek wrote:You're right. I misspoke. You snidely suggested that your towntowntown read was throwing his vote around when he moved his vote onto someone who you agreed was the correct lynch for the day.In post 3033, sekai no ki wrote:I quoted his PV vote, but it's not what I called him out for.In post 3031, Zdenek wrote:The trouble is that I don't believe you because based on your responses it seems to me that at least Aegor's vote on PV should have rung true to you, and that's exactly the thing that you called him out for.In post 3029, sekai no ki wrote:Re your other questions, my reads usually have a timing/tone/progression focus. Aegor's posts yesterday hit several off-notes. It was enough to hit my radar, and I wanted it in the game thread for future days.
They are and his seemed normal to me, and moreover, based on what you've said, they should also seem normal to you.In post 3036, sekai no ki wrote:It's like vote timing considerations aren't a thing to you?In post 3034, Zdenek wrote:You're right. I misspoke. You snidely suggested that your towntowntown read was throwing his vote around when he moved his vote onto someone who you agreed was the correct lynch for the day.In post 3033, sekai no ki wrote:I quoted his PV vote, but it's not what I called him out for.In post 3031, Zdenek wrote:The trouble is that I don't believe you because based on your responses it seems to me that at least Aegor's vote on PV should have rung true to you, and that's exactly the thing that you called him out for.In post 3029, sekai no ki wrote:Re your other questions, my reads usually have a timing/tone/progression focus. Aegor's posts yesterday hit several off-notes. It was enough to hit my radar, and I wanted it in the game thread for future days.
Which reads of his do you think make him scum or at least which do you have the most problem with?In post 3025, Majiffy wrote:Shit reads
They didn't. I was obviously wrong about it.In post 3037, Zdenek wrote:They are and his seemed normal to me, and moreover, based on what you've said, they should also seem normal to you.In post 3036, sekai no ki wrote:It's like vote timing considerations aren't a thing to you?In post 3034, Zdenek wrote:You're right. I misspoke. You snidely suggested that your towntowntown read was throwing his vote around when he moved his vote onto someone who you agreed was the correct lynch for the day.In post 3033, sekai no ki wrote:I quoted his PV vote, but it's not what I called him out for.In post 3031, Zdenek wrote:The trouble is that I don't believe you because based on your responses it seems to me that at least Aegor's vote on PV should have rung true to you, and that's exactly the thing that you called him out for.In post 3029, sekai no ki wrote:Re your other questions, my reads usually have a timing/tone/progression focus. Aegor's posts yesterday hit several off-notes. It was enough to hit my radar, and I wanted it in the game thread for future days.
this guys is who we should lyncdh imo
I get that it is possibility. It's why I tried to get you to talk about who you wanted to lynch today.In post 3039, sekai no ki wrote:They didn't. I was obviously wrong about it.
Then you shouldn't have to ask this;In post 3032, Zdenek wrote:I've done that with yours.In post 3030, Majiffy wrote: Pidgey is a fucking scumbutt, go read his goddamn ISO! And go read mine with a ctrl+f on Pidgey! Christ.
In post 3038, Zdenek wrote:Which reads of his do you think make him scum or at least which do you have the most problem with?In post 3025, Majiffy wrote:Shit reads
I'm just trying to figure out why you want to lynch pidgey, and since you've already proven that you're willing to push the lynch with bullshit you can expect that I'm going to question you on it.In post 3044, Majiffy wrote:Jesus fucking Christ ok if you aren't actually going to read I'm not going to fucking bother with you.
Oh dear.In post 3030, Majiffy wrote:Idk it just sounded nice so I threw it in there.
