In post 232, Titan wrote: In post 220, MastinSSK wrote:
Couple of things here that really just aggrevate me, because I know you can do better to make yourself at least LOOK like town.
But no.
You begin by outright discrediting any reason for a vote that RBD has on you without actually defending yourself. But then it gets even worse, you're doing so by appealing to a head of a hydra. I'm tempted to say buddying, but no. I think it's a come back of Appeal to Authority. You're placing Nat as the only "reasonable" head of the hydra so that you can just discredit any post that they make because you could think it's not Nat.
That's an unreasonable standard to set. Those are reasons I just can't see this being a town post.
AND you were in Attack on Titan AND Too Many Heads. Muffin can't really read me. He's the one who became less convinced I was scum in Too Many Heads while Nati was convinced I was scum. In Attack on Titan when Muffin was scum hunting me in the neighborhood and we got into our fight, Nati replaced in saw our interactions and declared me confirmed town and claimed we were now masons.
You're appealing to buzzword. If that was Nati to actually draw a link to a game in which he read me correctly and ignoring every reason why I'm town here is appalling. If that's a muffin vote, then okay, muffin can't really read me. But Nati can.
I never said one head is reasonable; I didn't make any qualifications for either head other than the Nati head can read me and the muffin head can't.
Wrong head again there. But once again, good job on the self meta. And also once again, great job on giving small examples.
But you should know a couple of things about Nat. For one, his reads are all off the cuff. You ask him to give a reason for a read and most of the time it'll be stuff that he just came up with. With his townread of you, in that one instance, I can nearly assure you that it was just luck. It happened to be good luck, but it was luck nonetheless.
Muffin, however, is also very skilled. It sucks that in that one instance he wasn't able to read you.
Experience builds knowledge though and you shouldn't be blaming this one instance on a weak appeal to authority.
Then you say though, that I'm just appealing to buzzwords and what I'm saying is meaningless. See. This again. You're discrediting for no real reason. Tell me: How is "Appealing to Buzzwords" bad? Because I don't see any reason as to why in that break.
But see, I think you're confusing what you actually said even though it's right above your post. You said that "Your vote sucks and Nati should know that". You do inherently give Nat a qualification when you place him as having a greater amount of knowledge out of the two heads. You are appealing to him because you are complimenting him. That's that.
Your post was scummy. Get over it.