I don't trust him, but I don't want him lynched today. I'm still not persuaded to move off SnowStorm, but my next choice would be mastin, and I'm having a hard time seeing myself not voting one of those two for today.In post 2128, Nero Cain wrote:In post 2127, penguin_alien wrote:I'm town reading Yates, which makes me inclined not to dismiss the TWIE-pisskop read entirely
Even if Yates is town that doesn't mean his read is right so what do YOU think of TWIE?
Why I'm not worried? Because I haven't seen you actually provide a case on any of your three scum reads. Which actually answers why I think your entry's odd too. That works out nicely.
Even mislynching town gives town information that scum isn't entirely choosing to provide, even if they support the wagon. Their night kill is far more under their control and leaves town with less information to analyze. Also, town loses half a lynch entirely, as two no-lynches is like giving scum a free lynch with their two gained night kills with no town rebuttal. Someone else can probably explain it better.In post 2164, SnowStorm wrote:Since when is it better for scum to not lynch than to lynch town?...In post 2123, Damon_Gant wrote: A few reasons I can think of:
a) To encourage another wagon and split up town votes more - causing confusion and small potential for no lynch.
Nero, you're going to have to keep scum reading me, because I'm actually town reading you here. I mean, it's your choice as to whether you want to think that I've learned something or am bullshitting you, but given the reliability of me only town reading you as scum, I'm hard-pressed to argue the point.