Mini 1566: Lunar Silver Star Story Complete (Game Over)

PhDScar · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:49 am

In post 146, sangres wrote:Why?

Care to be more

No really what part don't you get?

PhDScar · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:50 am

I still like/have a horrible inability to read Jake.

sangres · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:51 am

Why should I vote actionDan?

Hello Kitty Creampuff · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:52 am

JAKE WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE OTHER QUESTION

PhDScar · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:53 am

Have you read any of my posts? They basically all have to do with my vote on him. I think he was being opportunistic, and acted in a way with little to no town benefit and a major scum benefit.

sangres · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:54 am

Why do naked votes encourage wagons?

PhDScar · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:55 am

@Aegor again if I'm right about you being like Jake in a way. Then what is happening now is basically what would have happened if I didn't drop my vote right away, see how it takes up space, goes nowhere, and is annoying?

Hello Kitty Creampuff · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:56 am

Scar: If you're concerned about an opportunistic wagon occuring, what do you think of the one that is happening on the claimed PR?

ActionDan · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:57 am

Is your decisive read on me in the same vein as your decisive read on k dub scar?

PhDScar · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:58 am

In post 155, sangres wrote:Why do naked votes encourage wagons?

Read over my discussion with Mac I'm 99% sure we have already covered all these questions, if you still don't get everything after then ask away, but I'm certain I've already answered this.

Hello Kitty Creampuff · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:59 am

I've read it, and I still don't get it

sangres · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:59 am

In post 159, PhDScar wrote:
In post 155, sangres wrote:Why do naked votes encourage wagons?
Read over my discussion with Mac I'm 99% sure we have already covered all these questions, if you still don't get everything after then ask away, but I'm certain I've already answered this.

Don't care, answer it again.

sangres · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:01 am

In post 144, PhDScar wrote:
In post 141, Mac wrote:
In post 132, PhDScar wrote:
In post 128, Mac wrote:
Yep it does. Why would people starting piling votes on Jake though?
I meant it was still opportunistic by the way. I think I got the language screwed up in the first sentence.

I think it could get people to pile votes because it was early, and people like to wagon early, also it could seem like a legitimate vote at first glance. Hence me say "tempting" which still seems to be lost on people.

Why are early wagons bad, doctor?
They aren't I didn't say they were. What I was saying was that that naked vote could of easily lead to a wagon and been very beneficial to scum. I would appreciate more votes on ActionDan right about now guys.

This isn't an answer.

Hello Kitty Creampuff · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:02 am

:/

and now I must leave, joy

PhDScar · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:03 am

In post 157, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:Scar: If you're concerned about an opportunistic wagon occuring, what do you think of the one that is happening on the claimed PR?

Are talking the maso-lover-otherrandomjunk-thingy? Because I thought that was a joke.

In post 158, ActionDan wrote:Is your decisive read on me in the same vein as your decisive read on k dub scar?

No matter what one it is, you are still my strongest scum read and I think you need more votes.

Hello Kitty Creampuff · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:05 am

In post 82, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:sangres (fferyllt + Nachomamma8)
PhDScar
Mac

ActionDan

Aegor

HighShroomish
SMP
catboi
Kdub

BROseidon

Aj The Epic

Jake From State Farm

enjoy this complementary mara post as I take my leave

updated

Pedit: it might be. but the wagon isn't

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:05 am

In post 153, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:JAKE WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE OTHER QUESTION

WHY ARE YOU YELLING AT ME WHEN I SAID I WOULD POST WHEN I GOT HOME?

I'm literally driving home right now. Chill out

sangres · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:05 am

In post 132, PhDScar wrote:
In post 128, Mac wrote:
Yep it does. Why would people starting piling votes on Jake though?
I meant it was still opportunistic by the way. I think I got the language screwed up in the first sentence.

I think it could get people to pile votes because it was early, and people like to wagon early, also it could seem like a legitimate vote at first glance. Hence me say "tempting" which still seems to be lost on people.

This isn't really an answer.
It looks like a legitimate vote because it doesn't have reasons?

sangres · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:06 am

And people would sheep it because they like to wagon?
But they usually don't like to lynch because someone placed a tempting wagon vote.

ActionDan · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:15 am

In post 120, sangres wrote:
In post 117, Mac wrote:I just wondered the reasoning behind this question?

In post 97, sangres wrote:Why did it take you so long to come up with that response?
It felt like a long time.

Scars a strange one. I think I'll put him as scummy at this point.

Mac is a fair townread.

sangres · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:17 am

In post 169, ActionDan wrote:
In post 120, sangres wrote:
In post 117, Mac wrote:I just wondered the reasoning behind this question?

In post 97, sangres wrote:Why did it take you so long to come up with that response?
It felt like a long time.
Scars a strange one. I think I'll put him as scummy at this point.

Mac is a fair townread.

Who else would you vote?

ActionDan · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:25 am

Unsure how that got quoted. Um I dunno yet.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:27 am

In post 122, sangres wrote:
In post 115, sangres wrote:I think your case is probably bad but I think you know that.
Although I did sort of hope for some kind of response to this.

I didn't realize this was directed at me, but I'm not sure what kind of response you expected. I'm don't even have a case, it's based off my gut read.

sangres · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:29 am

What do you think about Jake?

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:33 am

In post 126, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:and, if my post was the reason you have your vote on us, why did it take for bert to say something for the vote to get dropped in the first place?

Why are you assuming that? Bert had nothing to do with the timing of my vote