I didn't get that the bullet points were for us. One moment, getting that list.
- (\
- (\
- (\
We pretty much already answered this, it seems, but anyway.In post 399, Shadoweh wrote:Less talking to someone who isn't as pretty as me? What do you think of:
- Nero Cain claiming not to be an Innocent Child
- Zdenek, in general I guess
- UT who tbh seems forgettable to me this game
- DayMasoning with Cerulean and/or making some weird SCS hybrid?
I'm glad
yes, at the hands of scum.In post 446, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:he does die before lylo.
Do you really think I'm milking it?In post 446, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I have a lot of experience with milking early claims for all they're worth
And then you clowns lynched KingdomAcesIn post 450, Cerulean wrote:Zdenek is...no offense to him, but a bit out there as town and his reasoning that he'd want to inform the town that scum do not have a framer in #443 is something that fits within that Zdenek-town framework (he did something similar in Marketplace Mafia 3, although that game was a bit different due to the mechanics).
Sorry Chamber, you're not someone I want effectively investigation immune.In post 460, chamber wrote:Anyone with useless abilities should probably use them on me.
but I can follow this.
1: Fuck off. I'm frequently one of the most obv town people in a game when I'm town. I'm frequently one of the first 2 night kills. Investigating me is a huge waste.In post 485, Zdenek wrote:Sorry Chamber, you're not someone I want effectively investigation immune.
It seems we're at an impasse then. My impression of UT is that he gives significantly less of a shit about the game as scum, at least from memory, and while the logic behind his pushes hasn't been super great, he's trying more than I'd expect him to as scum. Tammy told me she has some markers for him that she's looking for and she hasn't really seen them yet so we can do better than this.In post 454, Sixty wrote:Blink-skimming suggested Venmar as dumb Town. But I'm going to be spending the evening reading the thread so etc. You really should consider UT though, at least enough to drop the "much".
Honestly, the glaring lack of ffery is still in the back of my mind but I didn't feel like pursuing it further because your posts still read town, there's some other stuff worth looking into (though Tim Howard not posting is kinda dragging things for me), and if ffery's going to lurkscum her way through the game I'll find out eventually.In post 484, sangres wrote:Empire I'm a little surprised that a mere 3 posts seems sufficient to satisfy your concerns that the thread had a glaring lack of ffery.
What thoughts lead you to say this?In post 486, chamber wrote:giving you free reign to do what you want with your power isn't happening
Uh, if this is the case, then what about using the frame on a consensus obvtownread (I'd suggest Sixty for this)? The slot in question, 1) wouldn't get copped anyway, 2) would essentially become investigation immune and we'd avoid using it on scum.In post 489, Zdenek wrote:I may as well claim some more stuff since I'm being asked so strongly to frame Chamber, the frame is one shot and once I've framed someone he shows up as guilty to investigations permanently.
Why is that safer than not using it?In post 494, Cerulean wrote:Because I was thinking it's the safest option.
that was a ffery post you were replying to. I thought the tone was pretty obviously me but I do occasionally get mistaken for nacho in this hydra. we think zdenek's framer claim looked pretty town so I'm mostly interested in seeing who disagrees and why.In post 487, Cerulean wrote:Honestly, the glaring lack of ffery is still in the back of my mind but I didn't feel like pursuing it further because your posts still read town, there's some other stuff worth looking into (though Tim Howard not posting is kinda dragging things for me), and if ffery's going to lurkscum her way through the game I'll find out eventually.
Ironically, one of the messages Tammy left for me this morning said she didn't like that yesterday the only thing ffery did was pop in to ask that question about the miller from the ASoIaF UPick but not actually engage in the framer debate but she'll have more to say about that whenever she's ready to come back and post.
nevermindIn post 488, Zdenek wrote:What thoughts lead you to say this?In post 486, chamber wrote:giving you free reign to do what you want with your power isn't happening