Shit.
In post 4159, MastinSSK wrote:Oh! Just realized. Answer would be in my hydra QT, since I pointed out to SSK the 'crumb at the time. (I think anyway.) I get the time of my post, I get the approximate time of the catch. Don't have access to my QT until I'm at home, though, so that'll have to wait ~6 hours for me to dig up. (No promises of results, though.)
Did this, and checked. The note in the QT exists...three days after the in-thread post, on the twenty-first rather than the eighteenth.
It's possible I posted it privately, in chat logs (in fact, I'm almost certain I did--I'm ABSOLUTELY positive "Red Gyarados is a vig" came up IN chat logs, it's just a matter of whether it was the first mention of it or not), but if so, said chat logs have since been lost, and thus, what time and day I picked up on it is also gone. :/
In post 4164, CarbonFiber wrote:I found your response to my last wall lacking in depth. You say you want to figure out the game. Why aren't you doing so? I asked you what about my stances weren't clear but you didn't point to any specifics and it is coming off like you are trying to dismiss my pushes rather than understand them due to the lack of follow up. I also wanted to know what your issues with the game are right now and how you intend to resolve them. In particular, I asked how they make sense with your stance on Rancid. Your short response feels like brushing aside my questions and a large part of my wall rather than addressing them. Also, when is Beli going to show up? I want to talk to him about his reads.
Regarding PV's "townslip
:" We originally started off our neighborhood in a QT. Cabd then closed it and changed it to a Private thread about halfway through D1. I assume that the scum too had a QT to begin with which later changed to a Private thread. I am not sure how this affects PV's "townslip."
You know, F-16.
If you weren't so determined to scumread me. (Again.)
You and I would actually be working together on things like this. (Again.)
'Cause both of these? Are things that I JUST said.
In post 4168, CarbonFiber wrote:I don't like Mastin talking about "this is what a scum-me would do" etc, but her attack on Nacho gave me pause.
No, no. "This is what a scum me DOES". It's a subtle difference, but it's a vital one. One's rambling, with a side of boasting, and any tactical advantage gained would be trivial compared to the insight into my mind, there as a mere after-thought. The other's serving a specific goal (often ranting), with a tactical goal as the central focus.
In post 4169, Just Sheep Us wrote:Anyone who calls F-16 scum is either scum or in my "ignore this" book for the rest of the game.
(I made a correction, since I assume this is what you meant to say.) Well, yeah. Problem is, I can't think of anyone who has. Can you? I'd listen,
quite
intently.
In post 4171, Just Sheep Us wrote:This convo re: p5 is dumb because p5 has been pretty obvtown by gamestate since he was the obvious scum-designated mislynch.
Assume Rancid town.
Assume me town.
Who's the scum on the supposedly scum-designated mislynch then?
(Okay. AP. Fair point. But that wagon peaked at six, from my memory. Who else? Just the one?)