In post 4715, Nachomamma8 wrote:I agree you didn't kill him. I can see your team janitoring the flip if someone shot him since Rancid-scum's a massive inconvenience to you, and having the confidence that you can janitor the first one of you two's flip means that you're not afraid to buddy to shit like you did D1. But you're correct, you didn't kill him.
So basically, you're arguing that Rancid and I are both scum, and that we have a jan power we used on Rancid, but explicitly did NOT kill him.
...
In post 4498, MastinSSK wrote:YOU ARE USING THINGS THAT I DID AFTER YOUR CHANGED READ TO JUSTIFY YOUR ORIGINAL CHANGE IN READ.
My current read on you is pretty much composed of your reaction to me scumreading you, how uncomfortable you are with me pushing you. My read before that? It wasn't strong. Townread started dying when everyone else seemed more town, and when you stopped hitting the notes you were hitting D1.
THAT. IS NOT. A FUCKING EXPLANATION. For the original read degradation. This is not a town way to have switched a read. It has scum written all over it.
What notes did I hit on D1, hmm?
What about them wasn't I hitting on D2?
But you never thought to follow up on it?
Yeah? My comment was there. I'm sure if I searched my iso, I'd find a shitload of things that I wanted follow-through on that never came, yet I never thought of giving. Your posting in the QT about me was among them, in that it was something I thought of, but didn't think of following through on, since other things distracted me.
You brushed it off because you didn't think it was completely accurate because F-16 would lie about my suspicions in thread and I wouldn't publicly call him out and correct him for it?
You misrepping fucking scumbag, that statement couldn't have been more clear. I said that F-16 had biases. And that F-16 would be paraphrasing. Fuck, you saw it in Xeno, where Metal Sonic talked about bringing AP around to lynching me. Second-hand info, conveyed through the lens of bias. Not a lie, just not the truth. The two are not mutually fucking exclusive. And guess what? It took you a while to post at all. So of course I didn't think about you calling it wrong. Basically your next fucking post was saying not only right, but an understatement.
I completely went to bat for you and alienated myself ENTIRELY from the neighborhood. Bork has built up a hell of a lot of towncred between them (aka no one even entertained the possibility of us being scum), and I burned it the fuck to the ground because there was no way in hell that I was going to let you get mislynched. I burned that cred during the day when I told BRO he was being an idiot and tried to flashwagon him, and I burned that cred to the ground when I continued arguing overnight (against bork's wishes) that you were town.
You don't burn towncred for defending the truth. You build it. You might alienate players arguing against it, sure, but let's say you hardcore defend me and then I flip town. BAM. All that towncred you burned, instantly rebuilt, just stronger.
Also, nothing here explains your thought process, shows me the why. Behind your thoughts.
And now suddenly, I'm supposedly breaking cover against you and alienating myself from you after already burning my towncred from the neighborhood to the ground because apparently I hate having friends as scum.
This little bit courtesy of F-16. Yes. Because you can spend the first day building the credit, and the rest of the days pushing on mislynches that make sense to push.
Let me put it this way.
Everyone's scumreading me. My iso's ungodly wrong.
What consequences are there to pushing me?
None.
What can be gained from it?
A mislynch. Additionally, the towncredit in having defended me D1 where it mattered.
Is anything lost from it?
No, because everyone thought the same of me, of this being me-as-scum, so you can get away with it.
Nobody would bother calling you out on the change between D1 and D2.
So why not protect me until the end?
Because plans never survive contact with the enemy. I'm sure that was the idea. But something happened that made you panic.
Tammy not townreading you.
Me having an idea of the scumteam.
Something.
Maybe multiple things.
Seeing a change in opportunities.
There are any numerous number of reasons that you could change the plan from protecting me to trying to lynch me. And that's EXACTLY what I think actually happened.
(and all you've done is say you were and switch around a couple of reads: as town you show you're reanalyzing and prove it)
MY. FUCKING. THOUGHT. PROCESS. COULDN'T. BE. ANY. MORE. FUCKING. CLEAR. My reads have changed. A FUCKING TON. And not only have they changed, but I've shown EXACTLY. why. they fucking changed. THERE IS LITERALLY NO WAY THEY COULD BE MORE FUCKING TRANSPARENT. In how I have shown it. Not told it. Fucking shown it. Throughout the fucking day. More has changed than hasn't, and I've shown that.
If you really were reanalyzing like you say you are, you'd be able to see that obvious, obvious fact at least.
I maintain enough sanity to admit that when it comes to your points, my first instinct is, "hmm, fair point". So it triggers my thinking. "Okay. So it's a good point. Don't bias. Don't bias. Think that through." And that triggers the next stream of thoughts. "If he's not scum, who else could be?" I get a mental checklist, but overall come up not really having anything for Nacho. "Well, that's kinda bad, considering you're trying to prove you're
not
biased and that thought shows that you kinda are. But we'll have to do the best we can to work with it. Assuming there's a scumteam that's viable without him, then what?" (Well, I did say I need to refine my process.
)
And that goes onto the next. "Okay. Evaluate. It's Nacho, right?" And that makes me think. "I have faith in his competency as a scum player." Which goes on, "...but does that mean he could actually do it as scum?" And I ask myself how I feel about his posting, and the answer's, "kinda artificial, not with the passion of towNacho". And with that, I try to keep it unbiased, and go, "Okay. Scenario making. Which makes more sense?" And run through things. Your version. Then I think about you, and think, "well, that's good, but if he's scum. Let's not cook up some delusional fantasy of what he'd do. Seriously. If he was scum...knowing what I do about him...what would he do?" And that creates what you see, which triggers the thought, "That looks plausible. Does it violate occam's razor?" If not, "does it sound like I'm BSing to myself", to which, the best I can get is generally a "maybe, I dunno". So the thought gets posted, incomplete as it may be, as essentially,
"Well, this is what you'd do as scum, with what you're saying being what you'd do as town." And final analysis on it being, "I have no fucking clue; I can't tell, since both seem just about equally viable." Which triggers the final thought, "So what's my read?" And that's where I find, "...overall, still seeing more scum than town".
But it's not convenient for you to bring up as scum, so you just happily ignore all motive for me changing my reads the way that I did as scum and instead cry "look, a contradiction!".
Oh this is rich.
.
Coming from a player trying to paint me as scum.
Chain of command.
...Where you were doubting your read on me D1 and even scumread me at one point, and were promptly nightkilled immediately? Of course I didn't forget, that's one of the fucking games I've been using as an example for why you have read me correctly.
I can see gigantic alienations in the form of your treatment of BRO's anxiety attack, and your latest rant to ffery about tossing her diplomat hat down.
...Both of which are reach-outs, frustrated and on the verge of giving up on the players altogether, but reach-outs all the same. BROseidon's freak-out was over scumreading me, and almost getting lynched. I have said multiple fucking times that's what I see it as being, boiled down. That his main reason for breaking down was over a read I knew him to be wrong about. That's my fucking reach-out. Because bluntly, whether he wants to hear it or not, that's the fucking truth.
Similarly for ffery. She flat-out fucking refused to work with me, in spite of me being town, and me having come to an understanding about her that made her basically conftown.
I have reached-out to every fucking single player alive, practically. I have engaged Clyton. Kinda sorta engaged PV, though not really. Kinda sorta engaged Red Gyarados. Have been working extensively with Tammy and F-16. I've also multiple times dealt with DesBRO and pie. I've not really had a chance to reach out to Fox/Hound, but have townread them and without even having engaged each other, I think we've come kinda to an understanding.
Probably more. But it's there. In all of my damn posting.
I'm glad you found your scum stride again.
Know what my scum stride is?
Paranoia.
Book of Shadows.
Attack on Titan.
You know. Games where I was in control basically the whole fucking time. And again, what they all had in common? Is that I had zero to give the town, always working in the background to coordinate their downfall.
No scum game can flourish without the ability to post, and post a lot.
Yes. But post this fucking much? You're ignoring the mindset. The motive. The reason.
You're ignoring the very thought process you know to exist about me
. About how I work as scum, setting up town to die. About how I try to stay outside of the fray. Instead, you're saying that I'm jumping into it as scum, and that I cannot control my impulses as scum to post...when you of all fucking people know that as scum I have a better control over my impulses than normal, in that my scumplay is deadly-effective simply because I am a fucking master. MASTER. Of timing.
I don't know where you get your motivation, I don't care where you get your motivation.
AND THIS IS WHY YOU ARE A FUCKING SCUMBAG, BECAUSE A TOWNACHO MOST CERTAINLY
WOULD
.
Because my motivation for posting this much couldn't be any fucking more clearly indicative of my mindset this game.