In post 5680, Titan wrote: In post 5678, CupcakePanda wrote:The thing that pisses me off most about this day is that I can see AP gloating over getting me lynched despite a guilty.
Fuck after what I did to you and bro you guys enjoy it because its not gonna last.
What do you think about bro claiming to have tracked ap to ffery?
Well, that's what tripped me up at first.
However, considering we already have players claiming to be roleblocked, the likelihood of me being roleblocked is essentially 0.
The only possibilities then would like in there being a redirector or busdriver. Why a redirector would target me is LOLOL so lets discount that.
The last possibility would be a busdriver. If there was one who targetted AP+someone last night, they should've claimed already. Given no claim, we will discount that.
What remains is that, my action went through and AP is lying scum. Why despbros would come out with that fake tracker claim as scumbuddies I have no idea.
The last possibility is that, my action did NOT go through, but that would involve AP fakeclaiming ANYWAYS so.
Actually... typing up this post, now that you mention it, that is a possibility. HOWEVER, despbros claimed that their action fails on scum...
SIDETRACK:
WHY THE FUCK WOULD THERE BE A ROLE THAT'S STRONGER THAN COP ANYWAYS?! THINK ABOUT IT, IT ESSENTIALLY GIVES ALIGNMENT RESULT + ROLE CONFIRMATION OF TOWNIES
Actually the entire claim just seems wack.
But it would be a possibility that despbros is town given an AP scumflip. Their claim seems like WHOOOOOOOSH though and I'd be happier assuming their scum anyways.
EITHER WAY
AP IS SCUM AND CAN'T POSSIBLY BE TOWN
As for DESPBROS, I'm probably going to regret giving them a way out after AP flips scum, but well... right now, that's all I can think of, and while I disagree with being forthcoming, meh.
It IS possible that AP actioned N2 AS FAKECLAIMING SCUM (ROLE IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE). In that event, he probably roleblocked stalin.
NACHO ON THE OTHER HAND
DESERVES ROPE