Zephyrus (4) - Juls, Belisarius, FormerFish, Cho
FormerFish (2) - Kagami, Nobody Special
Kagami (1) - geists
Not Voting: Zephyrus, MTD, PhDScar, Who
(expired on 2014-05-17 13:57:32)
I think you are grossly mischaracterizing this post.
Where is the strong advocacy?It strongly advocates for lynching among the group of players that the poster is not a part of. FF seems to believe that both scum are on the wagon, despite the fact that everyone off the wagon is null/scummy, except Who, the one off-wagon player he tries to paint as suspicious.
What reason did he advance for phd not being scum?The reasons for phd, beli, and himself not being scum feel forced, as does the "Are there 3 scum?"
Nati is good at figuring out when mass claim makes sense, and he usually advocates it earlier than most players would.342, however, does present a reasonable argument. I'm a little leery about it, though, since it feels set up by 328.
Re: mass-claim, I still question whether it's a good idea. The games that can be broken by early mass-claim are almost exclusively role-madness, in which the scum have to claim roles, and their role/actions can be evaluated or proven. That said, it sounds like nati has more information than I do about this game, so maybe it's ok.
:eyebrow: - Really?In post 36, Who wrote:VOTE: Josh_B
I tracked him and found that he shot the nonexistent intro townie.
Quoted for truthery. The RVS is very interesting and there is a lot of information hat can be garnered from the voting. Any attempt to discredit information gained by this phase is noted.In post 54, geists wrote:I disagree.In post 52, Kagami wrote:If 50 is correct, then I'm clearly wrong, but I consider RVS to be largely uninformative.
Something really seems off about this post. I know that Josh flipped scum, but...In post 76, Cho wrote:I don't like this response. Too flaily and over the top for such a short line to respond to, just he's trying to justify something that shouldn't need justifying.In post 30, Josh_B wrote:WTF is that?In post 29, Nobody Special wrote:Stop trying to townslip.
Seriously though, Bel was the first mod to accept my off site experience and allow me to sub in on JesusChristMafia. I wasn't going to play this game because I don't know what a peterman is, and I don't watch GoT or read Jane Austin novels. But, I saw that the game had been open for signups for a while, and Belisarius was in it, so I added my name to the list.
Except for JCM, I don't have any completed games on MS, so most mods have been rejecting me because of experience. So, that's the other part of why I'm playing. Empking accepted me, and I love to play the game.
I'll be at a disadvantage because I don't know much about the theme, but scum tells are scum tells, whether I know the theme or not.
UNVOTE: geists
VOTE: Josh_B
I'll stop reading now. Club time.
I do NOT like this. This looks to me like a complete Scum Buddy Bus. You're a N0 cop. I'm morbidly curious to what your N1 role is.In post 89, Who wrote:Just checked with Empking, I do not know what I will flip as so my breadcrumb might not work.
Roleclaim: N0 Cop
I investigated Josh_B and got guilty. Also, my role changed overnight into something totally different for no apparent reason (Hence me not knowing what I will flip). The second role was much more flavory and more pick-related than the first.
This is a very interesting post. The choice of words is completely bugging me.In post 95, Nobody Special wrote:Just for the record, I am almost positive that my character appears in neither Jane Austen's oeuvre nor inanythingwritten by George RR Martin.
Also, let's go with the cop guilty.
Vote: Josh
Scum's motivation is to bus a newb scum so that they have a clear path later.In post 100, geists wrote:What's the scum motivation for faking a guilty on day 1?
Educated guess? Are we WIFOMING the mod?In post 114, vezokpiraka wrote:Guessing. An educated guess though.In post 113, Nobody Special wrote:UNVOTE:
A lyncher is a player whose wincon is to get another, specific player lynched.
vezok, do youknowthis, or are you guessing?
And we can always sort them out later. Let's see.
Mod: If a lyncher would lynch his target does that end the game?
Because you had more to go on at this point? That's illogical.In post 124, Belisarius wrote:I can't.In post 121, Josh_B wrote:I could actually imagine a scum, sacrificing themselves for a power role they didn't want to lose
I also can't imagine a N0 cop who expects their alignment to change outing a factual result D1, though.
Not interested in voting Josh.
In post 149, Who wrote:I was lying.
Real claim: N0 Gunsmith
Gunsmith guilty on Josh rather than Cop. Meaning his VT claim just confirmed him as scum.
Everything about the changing role and not being sure what I'd flip was true. I left the breadcrumb of "Joshshotthe intro townie" and "horsificationgun" to let town know "Gunsmith guilty on Josh" in case I died and had an informative flip. Also, my new role is significantly weaker than gunsmith, bordering on VT-useless.
Faked the cop guilty in order to avoid giving him the out of claiming vig or something unless he actually was vig or something. But he wasn't.
Also, Juls asked me to flavorclaim earlier, the N0 gunsmith was a totally ordinary gunsmith PM nothing to do with characters, then the unexpected rolechange was more flavory, but with no explanation of the change.
Why is that the assumption? Did I miss something?In post 226, Kagami wrote:I'm presuming that was a vig shot, and that any scum NKs were prevented.
VOTE: Belisarius
...I may be a little ways away from being caught up on the norms now a days, but this seems like a SK possibility too...In post 228, geists wrote:yeah meIn post 227, fferyllt wrote:It probably was a vig shot. A suboptimal one.
In post 242, geists wrote:I think bussing is something to consider.
Listen, Thor, not having anything better to go on does not oblige me or anyone else to vote for someone we don't think is scum.In post 357, LoudmouthLee wrote:Because you had more to go on at this point? That's illogical. FoS: Beli
Can you elaborate?In post 357, LoudmouthLee wrote:This is a very interesting post. The choice of words is completely bugging me.In post 95, Nobody Special wrote:Just for the record, I am almost positive that my character appears in neither Jane Austen's oeuvre nor inanythingwritten by George RR Martin.
Also, let's go with the cop guilty.
Vote: Josh
So this is where Who unvotes, and given reason seems legit. This post was made 10 posts after Kagami and Nobody Special come in back to back within 25 minutes of each other to naked vote Josh. And I know, I know, Josh had a guilty on him but those votes put him at l-2 and l-1 respectively. Who's unvote on the back of those votes to continue discussion makes sense.In post 161, Who wrote:Why is the worst play to lynch Josh, the guilty scum?In post 160, vezokpiraka wrote:Am I voting who?
I should.
vote who
The worst play here is to lynch Josh. If who by some miracle is town he isn't a gunsmith anymore
Also, UNVOTE:
Some people have said there are things they want to talk about before the day is over, and this prevents him from self-hammering.
Ok, first things first. It seems that you are calling it scummy in one sense because I am not including myself in the could be scum category. Why the fuck would I think I was scum, or could be scum. This is possibly one of the stupidest things I have ever seen in a game of mafia, well other than scum saying that they could be scum in a 1v1 but that's another story. Back to business. Could you please point out where I wasIn post 348, Kagami wrote:Spoiler: 328
This is scummy for many reasons.
It strongly advocates for lynching among the group of players that the poster is not a part of. FF seems to believe that both scum are on the wagon, despite the fact that everyone off the wagon is null/scummy, except Who, the one off-wagon player he tries to paint as suspicious.
The reasons for phd, beli, and himself not being scum feel forced, as does the "Are there 3 scum?"
---
342, however, does present a reasonable argument. I'm a little leery about it, though, since it feels set up by 328.
Re: mass-claim, I still question whether it's a good idea. The games that can be broken by early mass-claim are almost exclusively role-madness, in which the scum have to claim roles, and their role/actions can be evaluated or proven. That said, it sounds like nati has more information than I do about this game, so maybe it's ok.
Are you part parrot and can't help but echo posts already made, or is this a prime example of what posting to post looks like? Offer up some unique perspectives and don't take us all the way down wifom lane with reasoning that should illustrate the exact thought process behind someones actionsIn post 365, Cho wrote:The fact that it was called "Night 0" and not simply "Pregame" is another compelling case for Who-town. Aside from the clearer idea that he probably wouldn't have bussed so early on.
Fuck it.In post 366, geists wrote:formerfish, zeph could be derptown, could be scum. Whatever he is, he's going down before too long in this game.
Kagami on the other hand could lurk, smarm and slime her way to LYLO.
I really want her gone today.
I'd rather you prod dodge like normal people do rather than try to appear like you are actually paying attention to the game and providing insight. It comes off as try hard, and scum engage in more try hard activities than town.In post 368, Cho wrote:I'd rather type up a quick game-related blurb than simply say "prod dodge". I'm busy.
In post 226, Kagami wrote:I'm presuming that was a vig shot, and that any scum NKs were prevented.
VOTE: Belisarius
In post 227, fferyllt wrote:It probably was a vig shot. A suboptimal one.
I would still like to know why there was a VIG assumption rather than a standard mafia kill or a SK? This whole exchange seems suspect to me as well.In post 228, geists wrote:yeah meIn post 227, fferyllt wrote:It probably was a vig shot. A suboptimal one.