bubbajack8 (1): ika
Dr Pants (3): Snork, Burning_Earth, MafiaSSK
HighShroomish (1): Antihero
ika (2): Titus, HighShroomish
Snork (1): Dr Pants
Not voting (3): bubbajack8, goodmorning, Kitoari
With
Day 2 ends in (expired on 2014-05-30 18:25:24).
Oh wow this is so misreppy.In post 348, Titus wrote:Antihero, you seem to like votes on bubba, ssk and BE. That seems like lynch the other low posters not me.
BE, you still need to answer my wuestion on mgts.
interpreting 333 as an implicit endorsement of an ssk wagon is so far beyond the pale of "reasonable", i don't think there's a word for it.In post 370, Titus wrote:Plenty of people were talking about an SSK wagon. Interpreting 333 as an implicit endorsement of an SSK wagon is reasonable. I don't get why you're hot headed. You corrected, I have my opinion of what you were doing. You have yours. You've clarified your current position. I think you are just trying to start drama to be dramatic.
I'm in agreeance with this, let me catchup though.In post 282, Dr Pants wrote:what caught my eye was snork's introduction. while there were a few people who didn't want a reinoe lynch, very few people actually defended him. I find it odd then that Snork was able to tell that "Reinoe is fucking obvtown". Additionally this looks very opportunistic:VOTE: SnorkIn post 206, Snork wrote: Reinoe is a shitty fucking lynch and looks to me like it has only gotten so far because half the town is asleep and the scum are having an easy time of it. That wagon is going to be uber useful.
Specifically, what happened in the first seven pages that told you that Reinoe was obvtown?
But you don't vote SSK?In post 288, Snork wrote: SSK's hammer was also shit. Not sure if it's from scum or not. I would think he'd be better than that.
VOTE: Pants
This is interesting considering the kill. You removed 2 people from the wagon (the dead, and yourself) and claim this is the scum pool (with 2 tiers). Inteerreesstiingg.In post 305, Dr Pants wrote: B_E, Shroomish, GreyIce, Me, Bubba, ika, and SSK. If their's scum on this wagon, then its amongst:
B_E, Shroomish, Bubba, ika, and SSK.
In post 313, ika wrote: bubba: you said you had 0 scum games, what do you have to say to our scum game i just linked here?
How come you were seem so mad yesterday?
What do you have to say about the 2 flips?
Actually I said I was never ASSIGNED scum. Which is true, the only time I've been scum is in games that I have replaced someone.In post 99, bubbajack8 wrote: I have never had a game where I wasassignedscum sooooo. I just play like I'm town and forget I'm scum.
In post 340, StrangerCoug wrote:In post 339, reinoe wrote:(I allow "Bah!" posts, by the way.)@MOD
How many "Bah!" posts do I get? I've got the Vodka bottle and I've taken back a few, but I wanna make sure every one of my bah posts count.
Can I "bah" for the rest of the game as long as none of the posts are relevent to the game because that would be so kickass and you would be my all-time favorite mod forever. Imagine all the dead players "bah!"ing throughout the game as the scum and the townies try to manipulate each other. Actually I've got an idea for my first modded game.You get one, and you just spent it.
Double negative = You do approve?In post 365, Antihero wrote:alright, just to be clear
i do NOT approve of a Snork wagon
i do NOT approve of an ika wagon
i do NOT approve of an SSK wagon
i do NOT approve of a Snork wagon
i also don't believe in ghosts
i also don't believe 9/11 was an inside job
i also don't believe obama was born in kenya
...since, apparently, if i don't say these things, people randomly fill in opinions on them
ok...In post 379, bubbajack8 wrote:I'm in agreeance with this, let me catchup though.In post 282, Dr Pants wrote:what caught my eye was snork's introduction. while there were a few people who didn't want a reinoe lynch, very few people actually defended him. I find it odd then that Snork was able to tell that "Reinoe is fucking obvtown". Additionally this looks very opportunistic:VOTE: SnorkIn post 206, Snork wrote: Reinoe is a shitty fucking lynch and looks to me like it has only gotten so far because half the town is asleep and the scum are having an easy time of it. That wagon is going to be uber useful.
Specifically, what happened in the first seven pages that told you that Reinoe was obvtown?
but snork just said he's not sure if it's from scum or not. why would an SSK vote logically follow from that?But you don't vote SSK?In post 288, Snork wrote: SSK's hammer was also shit. Not sure if it's from scum or not. I would think he'd be better than that.
VOTE: Pants
if he's doing it for his own analysis, why is it interesting that he eliminates himself (he's not going to vote himself) and the guy who already flipped town?This is interesting considering the kill. You removed 2 people from the wagon (the dead, and yourself) and claim this is the scum pool (with 2 tiers). Inteerreesstiingg.In post 305, Dr Pants wrote: B_E, Shroomish, GreyIce, Me, Bubba, ika, and SSK. If their's scum on this wagon, then its amongst:
B_E, Shroomish, Bubba, ika, and SSK.
not my style. i use questions mostly as a rhetorical device to point out inconsistencies.In post 383, Titus wrote:BE, I was surprised then that you referred to me as Scarlet then. That tells me you've done a fair amount of meta homework on me at least. Have you researched anyone else?
Antihero, you are acting as if your way is the only way to scumhunt. It's not. Sometimes watching and observing is the best approach. Sometimes getting people not to death tunnel is. We all have our way of scumhunting. Yet, your post isn't focused on hunting. Again, it's another accusation. There are questions sure, but those questions are designed to steer towards a particular answer. It's too early for that at the moment. The flurry of accusations seems to be a cover for your own lack of scumhunting. Put up a nullread here and start hunting them.
VOTE: Antihero
right.In post 387, Titus wrote:Accusations alone aren't scumhunting. Scumhunting is trying to determine the alignment of someone.
Why wouldn't it? Why would he vote pants?In post 382, Antihero wrote:but snork just said he's not sure if it's from scum or not. why would an SSK vote logically follow from that?But you don't vote SSK?In post 288, Snork wrote: SSK's hammer was also shit. Not sure if it's from scum or not. I would think he'd be better than that.
VOTE: Pants
In post 382, Antihero wrote:if he's doing it for his own analysis, why is it interesting that he eliminates himself (he's not going to vote himself) and the guy who already flipped town?This is interesting considering the kill. You removed 2 people from the wagon (the dead, and yourself) and claim this is the scum pool (with 2 tiers). Inteerreesstiingg.In post 305, Dr Pants wrote: B_E, Shroomish, GreyIce, Me, Bubba, ika, and SSK. If their's scum on this wagon, then its amongst:
B_E, Shroomish, Bubba, ika, and SSK.
Actually I said I could see Snork scum, and I didn't see a Pats scum at the end, so misrep much?In post 382, Antihero wrote: overall, i'm a little taken aback that no vote results from the commentary in this post. it feels like bubba's trying to approach snork vs pants delicately instead of actually trying to suss out if either of them are scum.
Soooo faked.In post 390, Snork wrote:(if it wasn't clear, i no longer think gm is scum anymore, and ssk is meh). not sure where people were getting 3 scum from unless it was posted somewhere that i missed but don't we have 13 people? it could be 2 or 3. is there some advantage to looking for 3 rather than 2? i personally think that's kind of stupid at this point because if there's only 2 you're making connections with townies and screwing up all your analysis.
I examined the lynch pool at the request of Titus. I removed myself from the list because I know I'm not scum, and self analysis in general isn't really a good way to do a PoE examination, it always will come off as forced.In post 397, bubbajack8 wrote: He's putting himself in the town pool with the dead guy, and then saying everyone else on the wagon is scum (in different tiers).
Says the guy whose account isn't even old enough to mod anything. Nowhere does it say there are 3 scum. And furthermore, attempting make association reads based on that is just asking for trouble.In post 391, Dr Pants wrote:theres 3 scum, because thats how almost every 13 person game is balanced.
Scum can't be wrong; only lying.if you're sure about me being scum, well then im sure about you being scum. good news is that I know you are wrong about me. am I wrong about you?
Cuz I said so.why isn't anti scum?
Good thing it wasn't an attempt at a townslip.In post 392, Dr Pants wrote:also your "oh there could be 2 scum" is the silliest attempt at a townslip. The silliest.