Mini 1572 - The Network [Game Over]

Snarky · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 8:46 am

Coug: 1. You are turning in circles. That's not funny.
2. Misunderstanding. I wasn't referring to other posts you made. I was just saying that it's easy to say a scumtell is not damning by itself. No scumtell is damning by itself, saying so is obvious and fluff.
3.Beast voted, NS explained the misunderstanding. Beast unvoted. Normal thing for town to do. You haven't unvoted. And what counterattack are you talking about? Is it your ISO 35? There has been a whole lot going on between your vote and that comment. All that time you were ready to see NS die based only on the misrep.
4.I'm not using it to determine alignment, I'm using it as a clue like all other clues. But whatever, if you don't believe in meta you don't believe in meta, I won't convince you here.

Aegor: Again, it's not his NS vote that is inconsistent. It's the fact that he attacked the Coug wagon saying it was misexplained while voting NS with no more explanation (and don't say saying "scumhunting has been sparse" is a detailled explanation).

Porkens · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 9:14 am

Vote: SiX

Let's do this then.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 10:12 am

In post 475, Snarky wrote:Coug: 1. You are turning in circles. That's not funny.

It's not supposed to be funny

In post 475, Snarky wrote:2. Misunderstanding. I wasn't referring to other posts you made. I was just saying that it's easy to say a scumtell is not damning by itself. No scumtell is damning by itself, saying so is obvious and fluff.

OK then.

In post 475, Snarky wrote:3.Beast voted, NS explained the misunderstanding. Beast unvoted. Normal thing for town to do. You haven't unvoted. And what counterattack are you talking about? Is it your ISO 35?

The reason I didn't unvote is that he was pushing RedCoyote for a very weak reason, which I addressed in my ISO 35. It was my ISO 38 that was a counterattack.

In post 475, Snarky wrote:4.I'm not using it to determine alignment, I'm using it as a clue like all other clues.

You are, however, using my refusal to supply it to determine alignment.

~Fixing tags.

Snarky · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 10:29 am

3. I'm talking about what's going on between your ISO 16 and your ISO 35. Why is your vote on NS without any reasoning, even after the misunderstanding was clarified?

4.No, not really. I said it was a minor argument in my case.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 10:38 am

In post 478, Snarky wrote:3. I'm talking about what's going on between your ISO 16 and your ISO 35. Why is your vote on NS without any reasoning, even after the misunderstanding was clarified?

I had no better scum reads at the time.

RedCoyote · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 11:50 am

Porkens, you're voting SiX after you've been put on notice that he's replacing out? :/

RedCoyote · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 11:54 am

Saki, I don't know what the hell to make of your 448. What conclusion are you drawing? That Pasch is town or scum?

Snarky · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 12:02 pm

Gotcha!

In post 215, StrangerCoug wrote:It's just... hard to get reads in this Kafkaesque game. I'm liking Aegor and Paschendale, beastcharizard is acceptable, snscompt1 is clearly sabotaging us, and Nobody Special is scum. That's it. I can't read the majority of you, and I'm beating myself up for that.

In post 280, StrangerCoug wrote:I'm fairly confident in Aegor-town. I can see RedCoyote-town, too, but I'm not betting my life on it. Still want Nobody Special dead.

In post 286, StrangerCoug wrote:Nobody Special is the only solid scum read. While I don't like sns either, I get the feeling he's being treated as an easy lynch.

In post 331, StrangerCoug wrote:Waiting for Nobody Special to die. I'll figure stuff out from there.

These are quite strong statements to make for someone only voting NS because they have no other scumspects. Taken from your ISO 21, 28, 29 and 34, which are all between you vote on NS and your first mention of something really scummy NS made, on ISO 35.

RedCoyote · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 12:16 pm

VOTE: idk

What do y'all think of lynching one of our lurkers? This guy has always been a day late and a dollar short.

Does this vote make me a wimp? I'm undecided on SC, but it doesn't really feel like a good lynch to me. I have to eat humble pie with beast flipping town. I really thought he was scum. As much as I dislike the way Aegor is approaching this game, he's probably town.

Porkens 455 wrote:Red: help? I'm about to lose interest in this game completely.

Well, if you stick through it another day, I'd imagine we're going to see some serious PR action. The beast kill is an early indicator of that.

snscompt1 · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 12:31 pm

I feel like idk is a VT. The slacking and saying you'll get to it is how I typically am as VT. Cxinlee or Six wouldn't be a totally bad idea though.

Aegor · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 5:46 pm

In post 475, Snarky wrote:Aegor: Again, it's not his NS vote that is inconsistent. It's the fact that he attacked the Coug wagon saying it was misexplained while voting NS with no more explanation (and don't say saying "scumhunting has been sparse" is a detailled explanation).

That is a sufficiently detailed explanation. Either NS' posts contain content, or they do not. If they do not, which was Pasch's claim, then it is obviously impossible to pinpoint specific problems with them and one is forced to say something like "scumhunting has been sparse."

Aegor · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 5:48 pm

In post 484, snscompt1 wrote:I feel like idk is a VT. The slacking and saying you'll get to it is how I typically am as VT. Cxinlee or Six wouldn't be a totally bad idea though.

OMG. You have so got to die.

Would be fine lynching idk tomorrow; not today.

snscompt1 · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon May 19, 2014 11:05 pm

Issues bro. You have them.

cxinlee · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 12:09 am

Aegor/Red Coyote are still town

I have sns as town, mainly due to the early push on me which I don't see coming from scum.

I don't like Porkens' push on Pasch, especially #443. I also have a theory that I'm quite sure is true.

VOTE: Porkens

Snarky seems to be trying his best to get SC lynched rather than trying to get scum lynched, but I get town vibes off him, so I assume to be biased town for now.

cxinlee · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 12:13 am

In post 416, Porkens wrote:Red, Pasch, and cxinlee were touching beast, for what that's worth.

I'm still worried about the possibility about a two-layer scum, or something along those lines.

Saki · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 2:55 am

In post 481, RedCoyote wrote:Saki, I don't know what the hell to make of your 448. What conclusion are you drawing? That Pasch is town or scum?

pasche is probably town but i don't want to think he's town because he's probably one of my least favorite players due to his posting style and therefore i sorta kinda want him dead in every game but it never happens
i just assumed porkens was thinking along the same line as me but w.e

snscompt1 · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 4:06 am

In post 488, cxinlee wrote:Aegor/Red Coyote are still town

I have sns as town, mainly due to the early push on me which I don't see coming from scum.

I don't like Porkens' push on Pasch, especially #443. I also have a theory that I'm quite sure is true.

VOTE: Porkens

Snarky seems to be trying his best to get SC lynched rather than trying to get scum lynched, but I get town vibes off him, so I assume to be biased town for now.

UNVOTE
VOTE CXINLEE

-_- reaaaaaally?

StrangerCoug · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 4:13 am

In post 488, cxinlee wrote:Snarky seems to be trying his best to get SC lynched rather than trying to get scum lynched, but I get town vibes off him, so I assume to be biased town for now.

If sns is working to get me lynched in favor of getting scum lynched, then how, exactly, are the town vibes working in his favor? Snarky

DOES

look better in my eyes now that we've come to the same page about things, but I want to hear about this from your perspective.

Paschendale · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 4:36 am

A lurker vote or a vote on slot in the middle of replacement are just lazy things to do if you have no better ideas. We have better ideas now.

Porkens · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 6:45 am

oh wow 6 different people have posted since I last looked. maybe this game isn't as hopeless as I feared.

kunkstar7 · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 8:30 am

:: VoteCount 2x2 ::

cxinlee (3)

-

StrangerCoug, Aegor, snscompt1

StrangerCoug (1)

-

Snarky

SiX (1)

-

Porkens

idk (1)

-

RedCoyote

Porkens (1)

-

cxinlee

Not Voting (4)

-

SiX, Saki, Paschendale, idk

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline for Day Two is in (expired on 2014-05-31 02:36:19).

Beginning replacement search for "idk".

Porkens · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 9:10 am

Vote: Cxinlee

This is correct. But so is lynching Six, regardless of replacement.

Porkens · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 9:11 am

regardless of the fact that he has requested replacement, is what I meant

Snarky · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 9:46 am

I don't get the cxinlee wagon. I'd prefer a SiX wagon over a cxinlee one.

Aegor · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Tue May 20, 2014 9:49 am

What is wrong with the cxinlee wagon?

And Porkens is plummeting down into the depths of my scumreads for a succession of bad cases followed by votes presented as legit when in fact they seem opportunistic.