Ikaruga Mafia (Game Over!)

mastin2 · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 6:59 am

In post 112, Xayzeck wrote:i'm quite liking the idea of mastin and tmct being scum together

Does not compute.
(That said, Anti and I are both thinking Xayzeck could be town.
In fact, his string of posting right there makes me pretty dang certain of it.)

In post 110, talah wrote:And had a 'one raised eyebrow' read on mastin primarily for not understanding/agreeing with the early reads, then Anti clarified that they're a hydra. So yeah leaning scum until there's a reason not to.

So.
I'm not sure I'm understanding this correctly.
It's fully possible I'm reading it the wrong way.

But if I'm not misreading this.
If I'm not misunderstanding this.

Talah's actually scum this game, for the very same reason he called me scum in 172.

Oh. And TMCT is still a bit of a minor scumread.

mastin2 · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:03 am

In post 120, The Most Curious Thing wrote:Is this typical town-Mastin behavior?

The only thing typical about town-Mastin behavior is that there is nothing typical about Mastin's behavior as town.

(ZX is hilariously town, btw.)

TMCT is slightly more scum than he was before.

Antihero · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:03 am

In post 150, mastin2 wrote:Does not compute.
(That said, Anti and I are both thinking Xayzeck could be town.
In fact, his string of posting right there makes me pretty dang certain of it.)

no don't sugarcoat what i said

i said he was clueless. and it was mostly based on Jordan's whiteknighting.

mastin2 · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:05 am

(Yep, just confirmed. Anti's take on Xayzeck strongly implied townread.
Speaking of reads, Anti called ZX town even stronger than I did, soyeah, we agree there.
He's got a read on SKOT, too; not sure I should share that one, though. SKOT is an ambivalent read of mine.)

mastin2 · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:06 am

In post 152, Antihero wrote:no don't sugarcoat what i said
i said he was clueless. and it was mostly based on Jordan's whiteknighting.

Cluelessness (especially to being WKed) implies town, Anti.

Antihero · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:11 am

In post 154, mastin2 wrote:
In post 152, Antihero wrote:no don't sugarcoat what i said
i said he was clueless. and it was mostly based on Jordan's whiteknighting.
Cluelessness (especially to being WKed) implies town, Anti.

right
but the way you said it, it doesn't leave the sting with Xay that comes with me thinking he's clueless.

ZZZX · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:25 am

In post 153, mastin2 wrote:(Yep, just confirmed. Anti's take on Xayzeck strongly implied townread.
Speaking of reads, Anti called ZX town even stronger than I did, soyeah, we agree there.
He's got a read on SKOT, too; not sure I should share that one, though. SKOT is an ambivalent read of mine.)

Can you tell me where he said that? I can't find it. Lol

Antihero · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:26 am

In post 156, ZZZX wrote:
In post 153, mastin2 wrote:(Yep, just confirmed. Anti's take on Xayzeck strongly implied townread.
Speaking of reads, Anti called ZX town even stronger than I did, soyeah, we agree there.
He's got a read on SKOT, too; not sure I should share that one, though. SKOT is an ambivalent read of mine.)
Can you tell me where he said that? I can't find it. Lol

it's in our QT

ZZZX · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:29 am

In post 157, Antihero wrote:
In post 156, ZZZX wrote:
In post 153, mastin2 wrote:(Yep, just confirmed. Anti's take on Xayzeck strongly implied townread.
Speaking of reads, Anti called ZX town even stronger than I did, soyeah, we agree there.
He's got a read on SKOT, too; not sure I should share that one, though. SKOT is an ambivalent read of mine.)
Can you tell me where he said that? I can't find it. Lol
it's in our QT

Are you masons or something?

Also can masons day talk?

Antihero · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:30 am

no we're a hydra

we're just waiting for the admin to activate our account.

ZZZX · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:31 am

In post 159, Antihero wrote:no we're a hydra

we're just waiting for the admin to activate our account.

That explains a lot lol.

Natirasha · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:04 am

I really don't know why you people think TMCT is scum.

Explain mastin.

I think you're rusing us.

mastin2 · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:14 am

Sure thing, Nat!

In post 114, Xayzeck wrote:also the way TMCT hopped onto my wagon, being all awkward and RVS-toney and what not bugs me too

Seemed like a good point.

In post 120, The Most Curious Thing wrote:Anyone else you want to inconsistently tie me with?

Rubbed me the wrong way.

In post 147, Natirasha wrote:I never said I had a meta basis for my read on TMCT.

TMCT no longer had a trusted-player defending his actions as town, either. Put together with my original scumread, and you get my current read.

TMCT is slightly more scum than he was before. (Not strongly more because these aren't exactly rock-solid thingies.)

PeregrineV · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:27 am

In post 24, Zdenek wrote:The most curious thing is scum.

Vote: TMCT

page 1 sheepage!

Vote: The Most Curious Thing

And I've just started reading, so has it been mentioned that the number of light and dark players being exactly equal by chance seems very unprobable?

PeregrineV · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:39 am

Caught up. Curious vote still makes me the happy.

mastin2 · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:51 am

In post 163, PeregrineV wrote:And I've just started reading, so has it been mentioned that the number of light and dark players being exactly equal by chance seems very unprobable?

Improbable, yes, but happened all the same. If anyone submitted a polarity and got back a different result from what they submitted, I think we'd have heard of it by now. Thus, no polarity alterations happened, and thus, all players made their choices which just so happened to be an exact 50/50 split.

PeregrineV · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:54 am

In post 165, mastin2 wrote:
In post 163, PeregrineV wrote:And I've just started reading, so has it been mentioned that the number of light and dark players being exactly equal by chance seems very unprobable?
Improbable, yes, but happened all the same. If anyone submitted a polarity and got back a different result from what they submitted, I think we'd have heard of it by now. Thus, no polarity alterations happened, and thus, all players made their choices which just so happened to be an exact 50/50 split.

Still find it weird.

Aegor · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 9:16 am

In post 163, PeregrineV wrote:And I've just started reading, so has it been mentioned that the number of light and dark players being exactly equal by chance seems very unprobable?

It is the single most likely outcome, although the outcome of a Neutral polarity is less likely than Light/Dark polarities.

Dry-fit · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:05 am

Sorry I haven't posted I've been having account issues which are hopefuly fixed now. Reading through.

Dry-fit · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:27 am

Vote: Saki.

That naked vote on sharpest knife is the scummiest thing in the game so far. Naked votes come more often from scum in my experience and Saki picked a bad target.

I also have suspicion of Xayzeck and Jordan. Xay I just can't really see where he's coming from in his posts. Jordan is gut but somehow his posts just don't read genuine. No one looks particularly towny but I guess Sharpest knife and Necro seem towny due to interactions with other players.

Also kind of worried PV's questioning is kind of rolefishy.

Those are my observations after a half-assed quick readthrough.

Zdenek · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:31 am

We could just lynch Dry-Fit.

Not that I've read anything since the first page yet. Well, except for the start of the post where he said that the scummiest thing in the thread is someone naked voting.

Dry-fit · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:34 am

Well there hasn't been anything of great importance that's happened so far that I can tell.

Thinking about it more PV's polarity discussion is probably town. Since no one else had mentioned it he has no reason to risk drawing attention to himself by speculating about it.

PeregrineV · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:36 am

In post 170, Zdenek wrote:We could just lynch Dry-Fit.

Not that I've read anything since the first page yet. Well, except for the start of the post where he said that the scummiest thing in the thread is someone naked voting.

I sheeped your first page vote.

I was wearing pants at the time.

PeregrineV · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:37 am

In post 171, Dry-fit wrote:Well there hasn't been anything of great importance that's happened so far that I can tell.

Thinking about it more PV's polarity discussion is probably town. Since no one else had mentioned it he has no reason to risk drawing attention to himself by speculating about it.

It could have been worse. I was thinking we should claim polarity to see how the fuck we got there, but realized it would have been so full of WIFOM as to be stupid. So there is that.

Bulbazak · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:37 am

Bump.