Burning_Earth (1): MafiaSSK
ika (1): Burning_Earth
MafiaSSK (3): goodmorning, bubbajack8, Titus
Titus (2): Jingle, Guyett
Not voting (4): Dr Pants, ika, Snork, Antihero
With
Day 2 ends in (expired on 2014-06-09 09:00:00).
was asked and mod wouldnt answer.In post 1105, Guyett wrote:A better question would be if scum have day chat
I checked a previous game of SC's that I played and scum got pregame chat but no day chat. I assume the same applies here.
What about my play has been safe? I've been aggressively going after scum and going after my townreads. Just because I was universally townread before Jingle spewed his shit doesn't make my play safe. I'm townread because I don't do the safe play.In post 1109, Dr Pants wrote:after the excitement has worn off of Guy's fake vig play, GM's point that the arguments on titus look to be confbias seem correct. Still, I think there's something there for Titus being scum that has more substance. I'll look into this a bit, but for now I think its that Titus played the day very "safe".
im well aware of his past games (street racer i was in), but it doesnt exclude the chance of him throwing a wrench into playIn post 1107, Guyett wrote:I checked a previous game of SC's that I played and scum got pregame chat but no day chat. I assume the same applies here.
To back that up I checked another game of SC's that I didn't play and the same applies
I was aggressive with everyone trying to bring SSK to the forefront. I was aggressive with ika until I townread him. I am still aggressive with SSK. I'm aggressive with Jingle, but restraining myself a little there.In post 1111, Dr Pants wrote:you've been aggressive with Anti but not really anyone else. The only other person you went after was Ika, but you stopped pursuit on that pretty quickly.
note that what I'm saying is that I dont think you should get run out for the stuff with Guy's fake vig, if anything I'm saying a lynch on you needs to be founded in something more substantial.
Well thats how many have preceved you. I just poke you untill i figure something out.In post 1117, Titus wrote:Pants, no. I meant refuse to lynch me. I'm tired and sleepy.
That meta makes me cry ika. It precludes me from ever being good town. Scum love it regardless of who they are.
This. This is why I want to lynch Titus. I've mentioned Titus' meta four times. The first was before reading any of her posts, to tell Anti that getting angry because her logic doesn't mesh is stupid. The second was that I felt Titus' early play was avoiding making any waves or offending too many people. Both of the others are directly addressing self meta. Titus tunnels as both alignments, for example, Scum-Tunneling Titus. The final reference to meta was me responding to you saying I should know you're town based on meta. Tell me, how many games have we been in together? How many games have I as town correctly read your alignment? Keep the bullshit coming, it's making me laugh.In post 1113, Titus wrote:ika, I am aware of that. Unfortunately, that's why I try to clarify the moonlogic = Titus is town. People in this game are taking the time to break down my posts, so I don't have to say something 10 times, but for Anti. You're being transparent.
I'd be willing to vote Jingle. I'm just trying not to confbias him for his shitty meta comments. You and I both know they are shit.
I want to lynch: SSK
I can lynch: Jingle
I refuse to lynch: SSK
Clear?
I'm sorry, I must have missed this. Links please? Same with my 'meta arguments.'In post 1027, Titus wrote:He also omitted my attempts to get the conversation to turn to SSK. When it didn't I tried to go with the will of the group, then Anti obvscummed.
I am bitter over that game. Town derped it up completely. Bitter at you? No. Bitter at all of the fucking stupid that came out of town? Yes. Your alignment this game? Not related.In post 1061, Titus wrote:Why and how am I desperate? This makes no sense at all. There has been zero pressure on me since I replaced in. I asked for a stay in lynching so that I could post my reads. I got said stay in lynching. I posted my reads. What part of that is 'desperate scum'? Why are you making shit up?In post 1053, MafiaSSK wrote:
Jingle's points are utter shit. Jingle is desperate scum. Why you can't see that? I don't know. Why wouldn't I just push Pants as scum? It was easy there. No. I had a legitimate townread on Pants.
In post 1073, Titus wrote:Pants, Shroomish was a null lean scum read for me. Jingle using my meta in a bastardized and wrong way (read: full of twists, assumptions and lies), makes me want to jump and say scum. However, I know that burned and butthurt people come into threads assuming I am scum frequently, especially given my winrate as scum. I just buddied the shit out of Jingle in Mini Theme Upick (either 1539 or 49 too lazy to check) and won that flawlessly as a mafia suicide bomber. Although faking that level of indecision was fucking hard. I need time to determine whether Jingle is butthurt town or scum. So I want SSK dead first.
Guyett, as having comodded with SC before, he would totally have daychat for scum. Not that I can find any examples of it, but I know that he's not adverse to it.In post 1107, Guyett wrote:I checked a previous game of SC's that I played and scum got pregame chat but no day chat. I assume the same applies here.
To back that up I checked another game of SC's that I didn't play and the same applies