Mini 1,573: How Do You Want to Die? (Game over!)

Titus · Post Post #1225 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:35 am

The guyett hammer is all about wifom. If you feel Guyett was positioning his defense, of course you would want to lynch him. If you felt Guyett is Guyett, you wouldn't. Personally, I would feel more secure if Guyett had a posted reason as to why the hammer, but it's not enough for top marks.

BE did little if anything of use and I just finished a game of resistance where scum BE did the same thing.

As for Jingle, I doubt any townplayer can persist in his bullshit. A little OMGUSy? You bet.

Guyett · Post Post #1226 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:48 am

In post 1225, Titus wrote:Personally, I would feel more secure if Guyett had a posted reason as to why the hammer, but it's not enough for top marks.

The hammer was going to happen anyway

Titus · Post Post #1227 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:56 am

Guyett, I meant at the time of.

Sorry for the confusion. After the fact reason does nothing.

Guyett · Post Post #1228 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:01 am

Oh I did post reasoning for hammering then too

In post 1181, Guyett wrote:VOTE: ssk

Yolo

In post 1182, Guyett wrote:2 wagons to analyse tomorrow, today was starting to drag

In post 1184, Guyett wrote:I flicked through and got bored

In post 1189, Guyett wrote:
In post 1186, bubbajack8 wrote:And you think that's town?

In post 1188, bubbajack8 wrote:And then you're lining up lynches? Really?

Titus · Post Post #1229 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:08 am

That's not a reason FMPOV.

Guyett · Post Post #1230 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:14 am

It is from my POV and thats all I care about to be fucking honest

Snork · Post Post #1231 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:14 am

In post 1225, Titus wrote:BE did little if anything of use

I agree with this. I wasn't liking any of the BE posts later in the day. I'd be willing to lynch there.

Re: massclaim - What I'm kind of looking out of this is to hopefully cross reference any PR results with claimed actions. I'm not sure how this will happen, but I'd suggest scummiest to least as far as order goes. Another idea would be to claim "act" or "did not act". Then from there, we can probe. I actually think this is a better idea since it doesn't give scum any ideas about what to claim.

Thoughts on that?

Also we could all post our preferred order for the first 3 and then popcorn from there. I'd go

1. BE/Squirrel Girl
2. Jingle
3. Antihero
(then bubbajack)

In any case, I'd want Titus/ika to speak last.

Guyett · Post Post #1232 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:19 am

Ika won't be speaking bbz, he dead

Titus · Post Post #1233 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:22 am

Snork, my rankings can be deduced and ika is dead. Did u mean Pants?

PR/VT massclaim is pretty good imo. Then fill in, if required. Anti keeps quiet on his target till the end or an impossible act arises. Ex: Adam claims cop with inno N1. Anti refutes bc target was rbed N1.

Titus · Post Post #1234 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:23 am

In post 1230, Guyett wrote:It is from my POV and thats all I care about to be fucking honest

If you are town, this is bad play. Others have to determine your alignment. Transparency is good.

Guyett · Post Post #1235 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:26 am

In post 1234, Titus wrote:
In post 1230, Guyett wrote:It is from my POV and thats all I care about to be fucking honest
If you are town, this is bad play. Others have to determine your alignment. Transparency is good.

I'm a fearless motherfucker. My alignment should be pretty fucking obvious

Guyett · Post Post #1236 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:26 am

In post 1233, Titus wrote:PR/VT massclaim is pretty good imo.

I agree

Titus · Post Post #1237 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:28 am

Guyett, fearless motherfucker says nothing about alignment.

Pants should pick first if popcorn or post order.

Guyett · Post Post #1238 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:29 am

I don't care where or when I claim

Snork · Post Post #1239 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:30 am

Titus a Roleblocker doesn't stop other actions from being performed on the target. It only stops the target from acting (blocking the role - not the player). Jailkeeper does that.

Anyway, yeah I meant Pants. And leave Guyett alone for now.

Guyett · Post Post #1240 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:31 am

In post 1237, Titus wrote:Guyett, fearless motherfucker says nothing about alignment.

you'd think that wouldn't you but I think you'll find out that you're gravely mistaken

Guyett · Post Post #1241 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:32 am

In post 1239, Snork wrote:And leave Guyett alone for now.

But I like talking to people

Titus · Post Post #1242 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:37 am

In post 1239, Snork wrote:Titus a Roleblocker doesn't stop other actions from being performed on the target. It only stops the target from acting (blocking the role - not the player). Jailkeeper does that.

Anyway, yeah I meant Pants. And leave Guyett alone for now.

Right. So if Adam claimed cop but he was blocked, Adam or Anti should be lynched as that would be impossible.

Titus · Post Post #1243 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:38 am

*with night 1 inno

Guyett · Post Post #1244 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:42 am

who the fuck is Adam?

Titus · Post Post #1245 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:43 am

A hypothetical player.... that's a hypotheticsl.

Snork · Post Post #1246 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:45 am

In post 1242, Titus wrote:
In post 1239, Snork wrote:Titus a Roleblocker doesn't stop other actions from being performed on the target. It only stops the target from acting (blocking the role - not the player). Jailkeeper does that.

Anyway, yeah I meant Pants. And leave Guyett alone for now.
Right. So if Adam claimed cop but he was blocked, Adam or Anti should be lynched as that would be impossible.

Well I figured that's what you meant, but that's not what you said. You said the target was blocked. Anyway it doesn't matter lol - I know what you meant, just wanted to make sure you didn't actually mean the other thing.

Snork · Post Post #1247 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:45 am

In post 1244, Guyett wrote:who the fuck is Adam?

really G...?

Titus · Post Post #1248 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:51 am

@Snork, I need to wake up then. Blah.

Guyett · Post Post #1249 (ISO) » Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:56 am

well I am drunk...

No I can't use that excuse... its not even midday and I don't think I could get away with that.... Hmm well I am quite tired from all of the work I've been doing and the insane heat... my toe is still sore and add to that a million mosquito bites and the pain is making it hard to concentrate.
Also I'm compiling lots a data and lose track of stuff...

Also I thought someone like bubba's actual name might be adam and you were just calling him by his actual name