Mini 1590: Brian's Flavorless Mini (Game Over)

[Prof Fridays]

I'm actually kind of reconsidering Clusk. I'll have to think on it.

FoS: Clusk92

PEdit: Welp. Alright.

[bjc]

Nice 70% success rate. Was it or was it not a real vote (the clusk vote)?

Also, espresso, I'm already on the wagon.

[Anatole Kuragin]

Look at bjc here, trying to start a wagon without even voting in it himself!

what game are you even playing dude?

[Espressojet]

Oh, lol, I'm an idiot

[Anatole Kuragin]

Nice 70% success rate. Was it or was it not a real vote (the clusk vote)?

Also, espresso, I'm already on the wagon.

It was a real vote, thought it may get him to respond. obviously didn't work.

[Espressojet]

I even looked through his ISO and didn't see the vote the first time

[Prof Fridays]

Oh, lol, I'm an idiot

I even looked through his ISO and didn't see the vote the first time

Maybe you need a little espresso to perk up your mind! Oh ho ho!

[Anatole Kuragin]

Townies are usually more black and white than scum, hence the vote on the null comment which was basically all he has said.

[Espressojet]

Oh, lol, I'm an idiot

I even looked through his ISO and didn't see the vote the first time

Maybe you need a little espresso to perk up your mind! Oh ho ho!

True wit!

[bjc]

Nice 70% success rate. Was it or was it not a real vote (the clusk vote)?

Also, espresso, I'm already on the wagon.

It was a real vote, thought it may get him to respond. obviously didn't work.

So when he didn't respond it made him more likely to be town than scum?

[Prof Fridays]

Townies are usually more black and white than scum, hence the vote on the null comment which was basically all he has said.

It also makes it look like you're "playing town." If something is null, you just ignore it and focus on the town/scum stuff, typically.

[Prof Fridays]

Though I will shift my vote for now. Prof Friday is fishy.

VOTE: Prof Friday

I will say I am part walrus, so it is only natural that I be 'fishy,' oh ho ho!

Man, I'm on a roll. bjc, hit me with a cold one!

[bjc]

Though I will shift my vote for now. Prof Friday is fishy.

VOTE: Prof Friday

I will say I am part walrus, so it is only natural that I be 'fishy,' oh ho ho!

Man, I'm on a roll. bjc, hit me with a cold one!

Vote Anatole and I'll gladly do it.

[bjc]

Or promise you will shoot him tonight.

[Prof Fridays]

But, babe...

[Anatole Kuragin]

Nice 70% success rate. Was it or was it not a real vote (the clusk vote)?

Also, espresso, I'm already on the wagon.

It was a real vote, thought it may get him to respond. obviously didn't work.

So when he didn't respond it made him more likely to be town than scum?

Makes him more likely to get replaced. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[bjc]

But, babe...

We need to talk this out in our masonvig qt

[bjc]

But really why u avoid my targets?

U no bettr

[chaoslord54]

Vote Anetolle

His reactions posts are horrible plus him then trying to throw Professor under the bus seems desperate.

FOS:ESEPRESSOJET

His sudden defense of Anetolle with99 seems out of the blue and suspicious.

[Anatole Kuragin]

your analysis of espresso is almost as uninspired as your vote, chaos lord

[chaoslord54]

That was a flaw on my part since I'm still a little new to this. I felt strong at first on my thoughts against BJC but then doubted my certainty especially as better evidence was starting to be presented against EspressoJet so that's why I then tried to see if anyone had evidence that could support or help me to willing to back off just because I started to feel less certain.

1.) I agree EspressoJet is giving off a strong scum vibe, as many people have mentioned above the way he was so emotional and over defensive when justifying his actions seems like newb scum to me. However there are multiple scum to be found so I don't see how Espresso acting scummy should have any bearing on whether you think Bjc is scum or not. As a town we are trying to pin down multiple scum players, so your "either-or" mentality between Bjc and Espresso looks like scum trying to find somebody to lynch.

2.) "I then tried to see if anyone had evidence that could support or help me to willing to back off just because I started to feel less certain." - This just reads scum to me. You are essentially saying you wanted to back off and so

then

appealed for evidence that would allow you to do that - trying to match the evidence to your actions rather than making actions based off the evidence.

You're reading way too much into my wording like BJC mentioned.

I am trying to say that I felt really suspicious of BJC, but his evidence made me less suspicious. So I abandoned it because I am trying to help track down and get rid of scum. If I continue to push for a wagon that may end up leading to a mislynch, how will that help anything? So I abandoned it because I again am trying to be more efficient. Basically, I do not feel like I have enough evidence to try and prove BJC is scum in day 1 seeming that his actions reflect a townish personality so I was going to back off, focus on someone more efficient on D-1 and then on D-2 or so try to re-evaluate and see if there's more proof or less proof towards the idea of BJC being scum or town.

[Anatole Kuragin]

I'm actually kind of reconsidering Clusk. I'll have to think on it.

FoS: Clusk92

PEdit: Welp. Alright.

I'll take my vote off of you if you take your vote off of me.

[Prof Fridays]

My vote has never been on you.

[Anatole Kuragin]

Oh, no dice then, sorry.

[Espressojet]

Vote Anetolle

His reactions posts are horrible plus him then trying to throw Professor under the bus seems desperate.

FOS:ESEPRESSOJET

His sudden defense of Anetolle with99 seems out of the blue and suspicious.

I was in no way defending Anatole, and I cannot see how you can discern it as such. You seem to be really reaching for a slip right now, and you're not going to get one from me.