↑Titus wrote:Didn't I tell you scum would be fucking obvious if they are required to fucking talk?
You mean like SnowStorm? Mr. "I didn't have a read on Majiffy until he started pushing me even though he started pushing me 600 posts ago and I'm only just now scumreading him once I realized there was an influential player in the game that isn't townreading him"?
Yeah.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
I have elaborated on my read on you. I have told you why I suspect you in a very clear manner. And you just keep on painting it all black.
And now you're postponing your thoughts on that again. There's no reason for you to not have posted your thoughts yet. Know what? I don't think you had or have any actual thoughts on the subject. You were just throwing shit in our PT's walls to see if it would stick.
yea, that's not a vig rolefish. That's saying that I don't know if there's a vig so why should I rely on a vig if there isn't one?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
↑SnowStorm wrote:@Jiffy If that's parroting then I'm a duck.
I have elaborated on my read on you. I have told you why I suspect you in a very clear manner. And you just keep on painting it all black.
Quote or it didn't happen. I'll wait.
↑SnowStorm wrote:
And now you're postponing your thoughts on that again. There's no reason for you to not have posted your thoughts yet. Know what? I don't think you had or have any actual thoughts on the subject. You were just throwing shit in our PT's walls to see if it would stick.
There's actually a pretty good reason and I've already explained it thoroughly.
But again, that'd require you to actually read my posts.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
↑Rogue wrote:Majiffy assuming snowstorm flips scum do you think mollie is scum for trying to bait mala to move our vote off the wagon as well as hard defending him
If my read from Mollie goes sour it'll be because of her interactions with me, not with anyone else.
↑Nero Cain wrote:Jiffy, what is your read on Toog?
I still think it's scum.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
↑SnowStorm wrote:@Jiffy If that's parroting then I'm a duck.
I have elaborated on my read on you. I have told you why I suspect you in a very clear manner. And you just keep on painting it all black.
Quote or it didn't happen. I'll wait.
↑SnowStorm wrote:
And now you're postponing your thoughts on that again. There's no reason for you to not have posted your thoughts yet. Know what? I don't think you had or have any actual thoughts on the subject. You were just throwing shit in our PT's walls to see if it would stick.
There's actually a pretty good reason and I've already explained it thoroughly.
But again, that'd require you to actually read my posts.
I posted this an hour ago... and you tell me I don't read your posts?
↑Majiffy wrote:Now are you going to give your own reasons why I'm scum or are you just going to parrot Mollie's paranoia?
You voted me for no reason, sheeping Rogue. When you did give some reasons (just now), they were not alignment indicative. You're not justifying a vote or a scum read, you're just trying to make me look bad by accusing me of stuff like fencesitting and not giving original opinions and calling my posts and reactions bad. There's not a single instance where you appear to be trying to get a read on me.
By not giving reasons to suspect me or interacting with me you give me no way to defend myself and prove you wrong. Basically, I can't deny any of your accusations because there aren't any. And yet you're pushing for my lynch. This allows you to just keep pushing me because eventually those reasons will come. For example, saying my reaction to the votes on me was "bad", as if there was any good reaction. By voting me you expected me to react and no matter how I did it you could just call it bad; from them on it's a domino effect. You keep pushing crap on me as if you're owning this and I'll keep reacting and giving you more "reasons" to keep pushing me. It's the same thing that happened with Titus.
I'm used to this. As Speaker accurately noted, I am lynchbait and every game there's one smartass scumfuck that tries pulling this crap on me.
Now you can quote those reasons you mention since I don't remember any and you have a much bigger ISO than I do.
↑Rogue wrote:Majiffy assuming snowstorm flips scum do you think mollie is scum for trying to bait mala to move our vote off the wagon as well as hard defending him
I am a scum pr can you lynch me now
"Sickness and healing are in every heart; death and deliverance in every hand.” orson scott card, speaker for the dead
↑Rogue wrote:Majiffy assuming snowstorm flips scum do you think mollie is scum for trying to bait mala to move our vote off the wagon as well as hard defending him
I'd be more open to this. If Mollie is familiar with the comics as she purports to be, then she'd know Weapon X is more than just the name of whatever they did to Wolverine et al. The movies may have glossed over the label. So her shit with Mac and Cheese looks bad in that regard as well.
↑SnowStorm wrote:You voted me for no reason, sheeping Rogue. When you did give some reasons (just now), they were not alignment indicative.
I want you to go one-by-one through my offered reasons and explain why each one is not alignment indicative.
↑SnowStorm wrote:You're not justifying a vote or a scum read, you're just trying to make me look bad by accusing me of stuff like fencesitting and not giving original opinions and calling my posts and reactions bad. There's not a single instance where you appear to be trying to get a read on me.
This is just necessary for you to say. And still a lie.
↑SnowStorm wrote:By not giving reasons to suspect me or interacting with me you give me no way to defend myself and prove you wrong. Basically, I can't deny any of your accusations because there aren't any. And yet you're pushing for my lynch.
More lies.
↑SnowStorm wrote: This allows you to just keep pushing me because eventually those reasons will come.
Great scumslip.
↑SnowStorm wrote:For example, saying my reaction to the votes on me was "bad", as if there was any good reaction.
There are good reactions. That's kind of how reactions work.
↑SnowStorm wrote:By voting me you expected me to react and no matter how I did it you could just call it bad; from them on it's a domino effect. You keep pushing crap on me as if you're owning this and I'll keep reacting and giving you more "reasons" to keep pushing me. It's the same thing that happened with Titus.
...Except I'm townreading Titus for her reactions.
↑SnowStorm wrote:I'm used to this. As Speaker accurately noted, I am lynchbait and every game there's one smartass scumfuck that tries pulling this crap on me.
Did you seriously just go from "How am I lynchbait?" to "LOL MOLLIE WAS RIGHT IM LYNCHBAIT GUYS!"?
Fuck off.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
ika thinks you are newbscum and from ika's perspective he thinks the game is easily solvable. it makes me lean town on ika but he is useless when it comes down to working with townreads or anything outside of his mindset. cos he simply won't.
Right.
↑SnowStorm wrote:
I'm used to this. As Speaker accurately noted, I am lynchbait and every game there's one smartass scumfuck that tries pulling this crap on me.
"I'm not lynchbait material!"
"OH WAIT LOL SLIPPED MY MIND IM ALWAYS LYNCHBAIT THIS HAPPENS EVERY GAME GUYS LOL"
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
↑Titus wrote:Snowstorm, do you have a response to the allegation that you've been parroting my reads for the most part but for Venmar?
Who alleged that? I haven't parroted anyone. I have a fully working brain to think for myself, and if I want to say something that has already been said by someone else I'll just say I agree.
↑Titus wrote:Snowstorm, do you have a response to the allegation that you've been parroting my reads for the most part but for Venmar?
Who alleged that? I haven't parroted anyone. I have a fully working brain to think for myself, and if I want to say something that has already been said by someone else I'll just say I agree.
Or lie!
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.