Is that sarcasm?
Agreed.
↑ MattP wrote:↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I think it looks pretty fishy how you are doing a complete 180 on your read now that other people agree Csar is scum.
First off, on principle, when people agree with my read and actually vote said read I more often than not flip my vote which is even evident multiple times in this very game (because I generally experience paranoia of believing I'm being manipulated). Second off, when an incorrect associational tell is contigent on multiple people's votes of said player, and their jumps onto the wagon are in poor form (especially MafiaSSK's), I become more paranoid that my read is incorrect and jump off of said player
↑ mykonian wrote:because you could get the same lynch tomorrow. A no lynch is a victory as well.
But as far as I can see, you are already set on not believing it because you keep approaching it from that angle no matter what. There's something else that you don't talk about that makes you not want to vote matt, which is a little annoying.
Apart from anatole and you theres nobody who really wants to speak out about matt, which I guess is to be expected.
To get myself from one tunnel in the other, I do not like TSO's current burst of activity, the singlemindedness of it. I don't think vezok and tso could be on one scumteam. The way things are now, matt could explain his actions as insincere as he wants (which he does), and it simply isn't going to take off. Vezok isn't talking and he's the default as it stands. Can't really be sad about it, but it is worrying me a little. It's going really easily.
↑ mykonian wrote:No, I'm talking about where you keep asking the same question but don't bother to respond to the given answers. I get it, you don't want to vote matt. Stop bothering me about it, because you are already set on not being convinced and I can do better things than talk to a brick wall.
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Myko, you don't see any merit to the Csar case?
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Myko, you don't see any merit to the Csar case?
↑ farside22 wrote:↑ mykonian wrote:No, I'm talking about where you keep asking the same question but don't bother to respond to the given answers. I get it, you don't want to vote matt. Stop bothering me about it, because you are already set on not being convinced and I can do better things than talk to a brick wall.
Like what?
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Because I don't think he is scummy?
You can't ask "why isn't ___ scum" because the burden of proof is on the claim that he is - and you've provided jack in the way of any incriminating evidence.
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:↑ vezokpiraka wrote:How about you vote farside and cut the crap.
why'd you tell me to cut the crap if you were just going to capitulate?
Anatole Kuragin wrote:farside - vezok kinda bugged me with that but my question was more out of annoyance than because I thought he was contradicting himself in some super scummy way. I don't see any reason to believe he is scum. Aside from that one vote switch, what is your case?
↑ mykonian wrote:
To get myself from one tunnel in the other, I do not like TSO's current burst of activity, the singlemindedness of it. I don't think vezok and tso could be on one scumteam. The way things are now, matt could explain his actions as insincere as he wants (which he does), and it simply isn't going to take off. Vezok isn't talking and he's the default as it stands. Can't really be sad about it, but it is worrying me a little. It's going really easily.
↑ vezokpiraka wrote:How about you vote farside and cut the crap.
↑ vezokpiraka wrote:Anatole being certain about something means he is just anatole.