Ikaruga Mafia (Game Over!)

[Bulbazak]

Field Polarity:

Light

Vote Count

Saki (2): Sharpest-knife-on-tree, DrippingGoofball
Sharpest-knife-on-tree (0):
Xayzeck (0):
DrippingGoofball (0):
Jordan_Downey (0):
RachMarie (0):

Not Voting (4): RachMarie, Saki, Xayzeck, Jordan_Downey

It is day 7. With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch. Day ends on Wednesday, September 24 at 1:45am EST. Countdown: (expired on 2014-09-24 01:45:00).

[Xayzeck]

scratch that, 6 scum+SK is autoloss

I'm autoloss'd, aren't I

fuck this game

polarities could still prevent kills

[Xayzeck]

"But Pere, you're not voting Saki!"

Yeah, he could be an innocent victim of whiteknighting/buddying/<insert mafia buzzword>

Tip's 180 on me, although I'm thankful for it, feels forced, somewhat
maybe I'm just paranoid

So, question is, is he?

Vote: TiphaineDeath

For 3483 and 3446[/post

]. And if he flips scum we can lynch scum-Saki with full confide

nce.

what's this suppose to show? if you're saying it's worth sheeping, i'm not sheeping it because there's really nothing much to sheep

[DrippingGoofball]

We know RachMarie is scum, right?

[Saki]

back

yes

but apparently a VI wants my blood over hers and we're letting him get away with it

VOTE: RachMarie

[Xayzeck]

We know RachMarie is scum, right?

i don't

you know after all that talk about it being mylo/lylo you'd think people would be a little more careful with the votes

[Jordan_Downey]

Two things that jump out here to me that is a concern.

One sorry I wasn't clear, I do understand you have things going on IRL Rach that is understandable. What isn't understandable to me is you seem to respond if someone says anything directed to you, and it feels to me in short order. You responded to my in what, less then two hours? Which indicates to me you are following the game. But you haven't provided any content for almost a month now, what you have provided is very neutral information. Like you are trying to stay on the back burner and not get noticed. When you have posted recently you also haven't participated in the game. If you can't participate I'd honestly wish you would have replaced out a month ago at this point. The fact that you haven't and continue to sit in the background makes me think you aren't town.

I'm also concerned with DGB post 3803. He mentioned lynch Rach tomorrow. His bases is on lurking. I don't see any other stance on it there. Which might sound hypocritical but my viewpoint on Rach is a little deeper then just lurking or having other stuff going on. Then doesn't mention Rach for awhile. What mostly concerns me on DGB is he's testing the waters on Rach. He's not taking a strong stance there. He's stuck his votes on PerV and then PN. Hasn't voted anywhere else. I also feel like his posts aren't from a confident, assumptive nature I'd associate with a town pushing a lynch. And how he's conftowned multiple people is beyond me. I get the SKOT thing now, but not prior, I'd perhaps want some explaining here as perhaps I'm just a moron.

[Sharpest-knife-on-tree]

We know RachMarie is scum, right?

wrong

[Saki]

by poe

Saki
SKOT
DGB
Jordan

leaving
RachMarie
Xayzeck

[Sharpest-knife-on-tree]

I am not voting for anyone but Saki today.
Anyone who is town will do likewise.

[Sharpest-knife-on-tree]

THis is likely my last day alive. I am already resigned to the rest of the town likely to screw things up. I am asking folks to follow my lead here.
Thanks...

[Saki]

this game is too quiet, too dead.

Claim: Reflector

I send all like-polarity actions used on me back at the user instead of absorbing them. (Which is why I guessed what a "Deflector" was.)
I was not told if the actions I send back are successful or not or even what polarity they are.
All opposite-polarity actions still go through.

I've been alternating polarity throughout the game, starting with Light on D1, and I am Light now.

SKOT can shoot me all he wants, but at his own risk

[Saki]

so yeah, really,

lynch Rach
vig Xay


or lynch Xay
vig Rach

ez win

[DrippingGoofball]

Pick one.

[Jordan_Downey]

I send all like-polarity actions used on me back at the user instead of absorbing them. (Which is why I guessed what a "Deflector" was.)I was not told if the actions I send back are successful or not or even what polarity they are.

So are you told if you are targeted? I'm also particularly concerned about mentioning what polarity they are ... By they I'm guessing you are saying the person or the action .... but honestly, why would you include that ... When you say you send all like-polarity actions back at the person. The polarity is the same as yours .... Not to mention you don't know if it's successful .... Does your role PM indicate it would be successful? As since you have the same alignment as them ... they couldn't affect themselves, so it wouldn't be successful unless your role reverses the polarity .... Your role doesn't seem valid with how you explain it.

[Saki]

not told if im targeted

i have no idea what my role actually does either
it doesn't make any more sense to me than you

[Jordan_Downey]

I'm confused as to what utility your role has for town. Also, the interaction with both tracker and cop seems weird. Stand by while the hydra discusses.

I think it likely that we are either in 3v2v1 or 4v1v1. There are 2 kills that came from dark polarities last night. One is probably protown-SKOT. The other is probably antitown. For this reason, I think that tonight I should lock someone we determine beforehand and SKOT should shoot from the light polarity, This should either A, confirm that player as not having killed ika or kill scum. This would prevent at least one of the NK's tonight from killing town. On the other hand, this makes it very probable that SKOT dies tonight. SKOT, what do you think of this plan? Everyone else, do you see any flaws in my reasoning?

[Jordan_Downey]

If we lynch someone of the dark polarity, then we definitely don't do this, as it means killing the vig for no gain.

[Sharpest-knife-on-tree]

That sound like a scum claim to me.
Lynch him. No loss.
I am going to do what I think is best. I am not going to follow any plan suggested by someone who could be scum.

[Jordan_Downey]

That sound like a scum claim to me.
Lynch him. No loss.
I am going to do what I think is best. I am not going to follow any plan suggested by someone who could be scum.

I'm hearing "No, I wouldn't like you to lock in my vig-target's polarity to stop them from switching polarities and would prefer to play a WIFOM game." Is that right?

I'm also leaning towards saki being scum based on the claim. It sounds like it's designed to make him a bad NK target, and with a claimed vig sounds survivalistic, but I want a chance to talk to my hydra partner. I'd also like you to think through the plan and reconsider it. If there is a way that it benefits scum, then we can drop it but I think it gives us the highest chance of hitting scum.

[Sharpest-knife-on-tree]

If you are not scum, you are free to lock whoever you desire. I am not going to agree or disagree to do anything regarding my polarity. It is clear what I was last night. So yes, it is WIFOM now and I have a target on my back. Any remains scum have to be thinking also of what I might do.

[Xayzeck]

It sounds like it's designed to make him a bad NK target,

this + the fact his role makes more sense for scum than town

and I'm VT

[Jordan_Downey]

VOTE: Saki

WIFOM games it is.

SKOT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHeP9Sve48

[Saki]

so you beg for my claim and now you want to lynch me for it

k
cool

im so fucking done

[Bulbazak]

Bump.