↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:↑ The Fonz wrote:
I mean yeah, of course you going out of your way to link a player I think is town to a known scum looks scummy to me. Particularly when you weren't exactly proactive about getting the known scum lynched. Scum try to tie town players to their partners all the time, it's a really common thing to do. (On the flipside, if Lissa is scum, that pretty much clears you). I mean, that's scumhunting, right? Your response really confuses me.
I think it's weak scumhunting because you're predicating it on an unknown that could go either way - Lissa's alignment. It also seems like you think that as a townie I couldn't possibly mis-read Lissa (if she did flip town) in a way that makes it likely she is teamed with Honey. It's like you're trying to paint me as scum for POTENTIALLY having a bad read. Do you see my point?
Well, no? I'm not saying you couldn't possibly have thought, or still think, Lissa was/is scum. But this response reads like you think I'm not allowed to draw any inferences from your behaviour in relation to Lissa and Honey until we get a Lissa flip, and that's absurd. I'm saying that I believe Lissa much more likely town than scum, and that tying town to partners is something scum often do. Therefore, the explanation 'Anatole is scum trying to tie Lissa to his partner' is reasonably plausible. That's not the same as me saying it's definitely the case, or that there's no way you could possibly have seen a Lissa/Honey connection as likely as town, which seems to be what you're suggesting.
And yeah, Honey had like 7 posts when I voted her and I had a few other scum prospects so I didn't push it hard. It was a good hunch and as I've said a bunch of times, it mostly came to me because of her artificial posting (you described Lissa's play as "me-tooing") which I saw her as having in common with Lissa.
Well yeah. Again, I'm not saying there's no plausible way a town would act like you did? Very few scum act in a way that's completely implausible for town. Quite a lot of town (see: FourTrouble) act in ways that seem more likely to come from scum. We're dealing with inductive, not deductive logic here. You're attributing to me a black and white worldview and a categorical view of your play that just don't exist.