↑ The Fonz wrote:I think it implies that I can't read that vote as straightforwardly town, either - I can't follow the thought process that leads to making that vote at that time, and it would be nice if Anatole expanded on his thinking regarding the various viable wagons and the deadline. I do think that Anatole returning later and basically not really talking about who was going to be lynched potentially scummy, though see the caveat in the original post.
This is a little goalpost-movey and is making me wonder why you reacted so violently to my line of questioning before:
1) My initial question was asking why 'no one immediately reacted to his vote' implies scum.
2) Fonz' response was "that particular point wasn't scummy, just 'weird'"
3) My follow-up was 'what is weird about it / what does it possibly say about someone else, if not him'
4) This doesn't answer that, but instead focuses back on why the vote itself might have been scummy after all*
* - I acknowledge that the verbiage was 'not straightforwardly town', but:
1) I am not sure how a vote in this situation could be 'straightforwardly town', and if you think it's null, ffs just say null and we don't have to have this conversation about what it means to be 'weird'
2) If you're trying to PoE scum on the wagon (where the straightforwardly town thing could have some context), say that too, but I don't see any indication you're doing this
3) This has nothing to do with anyone's lack of reaction to it.
If you thought the vote itself (or even his own reaction to the wagon) was bad, why take umbrage at my labeling you calling it scummy for a slight,
at most,
misconstruing of the reasons why in lieu of just clarifying what you thought was weird/odd/bad/nonreactive/whatever the fuck you want to call it in the first place?
-b