Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)

[shos]

Actually des has some good point against DT there with the RVS-removal-of-responsibility excuses.

242 reads as bad halfomgus.
243 reads as just bad. Pick an inactive, vote for rvs voting pattern(lol?). Lazy scumplay away from radar.

VOTE: dr pants
One sgould wear their pants on legs not head.

Add to that, 'not reading the thread'. what, if I don't mention your name specifically, you don't read? I intentionally did not name you here.

[Beck]

prolapsed is still my top read but I would be ok with shos, his play seems off to me

[shos]

wanna mislynch me again? why this time?

[Beck]

am I voting you? Your play seems off, it is definitely different than the last time we played

[shos]

Last time we played you guys quickhammered me on page 5, while I was making the post in which I stop trolling

[Beck]

only 1 person did that...

anyways, I have no plans on changing my vote unless it's deadline time and I have no choice. Prolapsed has done jack shit and promised content over the weekend which has now come and gone and all we got was 1 game related post.


he needs death because he isn't a person trying to find scum. hell he isn't even a person resembling this

This is me, telling all you scumz to watch out, us TOWN WILL WIN THIS!!

[theaceofspades]

i'm not a double voter, came in to point that out. It's a vote count mistake.

I don't believe that you have an investigative role. The sanctimoniousness with which you assume that it's obvious is what bothers me, less than the soft claim itself

No cooking eggs. I believe their claim.

-- Double

Why?

The ace of spades - no matter what you think of egg's claim,there is no way they are getting lynched today and so applying a vote is pointless. Once they have made the claim you have to let themselves ru with it for a night. Objection can be raised but voting against them isn't going to go anywhere.

Okay......
UNVOTE:

Ace's 56 - I'm interested in this read because Shos himself admitted that he was trolling. How did you find him to be more townie than scummy?

I'm more inclined to see trolling as town than scum. Maybe it's not correct in theory, but in my experience it's more likely for him to be town. Just dumb.

[Beck]

trolling is a case by case basis, cause I have certainly seen scum troll before

[theaceofspades]

Actually des has some good point against DT there with the RVS-removal-of-responsibility excuses.

242 reads as bad halfomgus.
243 reads as just bad. Pick an inactive, vote for rvs voting pattern(lol?). Lazy scumplay away from radar.

VOTE: dr pants
One sgould wear their pants on legs not head.

I don't really get this.....

Or maybe i just disagree, I also generally have a problem with RVS wagons, i don't ever see any real town reason for starting them, there's just to much to chance.

Reading aronis' iso though......i have a few problems with it. They lie within

Spoiler:

Aronis, have you ever been in a hydra before? Your reason for scum reading DT seems to be because you dont think they are playing to Titus's meta game, but thats fairly irrelevant since its not just Titus posting.

Also going to take this moment to point out that Aronis and BBT both seem to like joining what ever new wagon pops up, with BBT being especially guilty of this. Shos has looked somewhat better, his explanation of drunk posting at the beginning makes some sense for playing out of character.

UNVOTE: Shos
VOTE: BBT

I'm jumping on every new wagon that shows up?

And I was just moving my vote around to see what happens. Unfortunately, I found the explanation of 'We're trying to actively lurk and cant explain why' not very reassuring, so my vote stays there.

This bothers me because the "vote hopping till something sticks" strategy is scummy. If he was actively pressuring the people he votes for i wouldn't have a problem with it, but just throwing votes till someone reacts is the easiest way to provoke a reaction without risking saying something stupid.

Vote Double Trouble

Why would Titus want to lurk?

This is a really really really good point. Titus rarely, if ever lurks. Usually she is one of the most active people in game.

VOTE: DoubleTrouble

This is just opportunistic. Lurking isn't inherently scummy, and if Titus usually is active, unless there's a meta suggestion that this is only true as town then it's a bad meta read. Also what pant's says in 197 is true here as well.

He's reaction to desparado's vote also is minimal. Why post at this point if you're not going to say any thing?

VOTE: Aronis

[theaceofspades]

trolling is a case by case basis, cause I have certainly seen scum troll before

sure. In this case i'm not sure. I'll read his iso. But just playing by odds, i'd guess trolling town before trolling scum.

[theaceofspades]

I'd like to log my interest in lynching Egg tomorrow. If that hasn't been made clear. Cop gambits are bad mmkaay

[shos]

if Pants ever flips scum and aronis doesn't, lynch this ^^^^^

[theaceofspades]

does that seem even remotely likely?

[shos]

Yes, because if I am wrong, and you are his buddy, then you negate me with little words, and then attack my other scumread, a move which is viable to collect my vote too, lightening the wagon on your buddy and encouraging a mislynch.

[shos]

(wrong about aronis being scum, that is)

[geraintm]

Why is calling you town a town tell?

It isnt

[geraintm]

Ger's analysis of me is neat, lol. That vote was indeed fake.
Other than that though,nothing to eat.

I mean in bbts 56-85 yhoughts.

Neat? Neat? Is this a madonna/Kevin Costner thing?

I have no idea what a fake vote is. Except something I dislike.

[shos]

it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.

[Majiffy]

I'll put up a VC sometime later today.

[geraintm]

it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.

Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you.
VOTE: shos

[Beck]

it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.

Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you.
VOTE: shos

You been on site since 2006 and you seriously making that post?

[shos]

it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.

Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you.
VOTE: shos

`


pedit:
"Your message contains too many smilies."

[Majiffy]

"Your message contains too many smilies."

wat

I had no idea there was a smiley limit. I bet Mastin knew!

[Majiffy]

THIS IS A VOTECOUNT LOL

Prolapsed Brain (1): Beck
Desperado (1): Double Trouble
Shos (1): geraintm
DrPants (1): Shos
DoubleTrouble (2): Prolapsed Brain, Aronis
BlueBloodedToffee (1): DrPants
geraintm (1): Egg
Aronis (2): Desperado, theaceofspades
theaceofspades (1): Perfect Chaos


Not Voting: GrayFoxxxx, BlueBloodedToffee
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is Monday, October 6 at 3:30 PM Eastern

Accuracy never guaranteed. But

probably

accurate.

[GrayFoxxxx]

I think the mod is skipping my vote on purpose.

Vote shos