↑ mykonian wrote:Not particulary. You could try to understand farsides case once more. It's not hard.
TSO softclaims a guilty of sorts on SSK, anatole's buddy. Anatole hops on, it's SSK after all, you let him go.
Then, csareo comes in and casts doubt on TSO's claim. It doesn't look good. Anatole hops off, "csareo is making sense".
Then, when town figures out they do want to follow TSO, anatole knows he needs to be back in his good looking early bussing spot: he's on again.
That unvote is opportunistic scum play. That's where you catch anatole, not in the hundreds of posts asking questions and setting things up. Like I complained earlier on, anatole has a defensive playstyle this game. It aims to explain every action they do, doesn't focus on outplaying scum, finding them. This was a point where there's an action he tries to explain, but does it wishy washy: he stepped out. His "csareo was kind of making good points", but him not joining him in voting TSO, for example, is a weak play that he's trying to avoid here when we pushed him on it, he's got only weak excuses. This is the point where he shows his intentions, this was the crack in his armor.
I don't know how I missed those first posts yesterday. Myko - you voted TSO and said he was fakeclaiming to defend SSK. How is that not way scummier than what you accused me of yesterday? You also said almost exactly what you quoted me as saying
csareo, you are posting sense here
So why would it be a point against me that I was considering what he was saying?
