Yet Another Dance of the Title Fairy: Change Up

quadz08 · Post Post #3900 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:56 am

agreed

Klazam · Post Post #3901 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:57 am

↑ SleepyKrew wrote:House of Lies will look bad under her name

Agree.

MTD · Post Post #3902 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:59 am

Hm, I don't think so.

ISO · Post Post #3903 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:21 am

oh. that's a good point.

Klazam · Post Post #3904 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:23 am

Can anyone make a mock up of it? I've seem those before in this thread but I don't know how

InflatablePie · Post Post #3905 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:32 am

looks okay to me

(I forget what font we use but it's close enough)

saulres · Post Post #3906 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:33 am

Put it together? HouseOfLies

(Don't know if that even makes sense, I don't have access to the source thread.)

quadz08 · Post Post #3907 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:33 am

generally speaking, if it's got part of the username in it, it's a bad title

this applies here

Guyett · Post Post #3908 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:36 am

Lying house?

ISO · Post Post #3909 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:38 am

That is so much worse

InflatablePie · Post Post #3910 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:49 am

@quadz: I'm going to be the person to bring up Khan Man because someone always does

the tl;dr of the thread was a house-related hypothetical situation. to quote while still keeping things vague because speakeasy - "What's great is that there is literally ONE person in this thread who gets it, and everyone else only thinks they do."

the thread isn't actually ABOUT a house, therefore it could be considered a 'house of lies', the username pun/relevance just makes it fit better.

quadz08 · Post Post #3911 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:05 am

Khan Man is not a good title, as previously discussed in this thread here

quadz08 · Post Post #3912 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:06 am

Also I have read the thread and fully understand the significance of the suggested title. That changes nothing about my concerns with it.

ISO · Post Post #3913 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:23 am

The Sass Menagerie

should be adopted already so we can rid ourselves of this argument.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #3914 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:41 am

↑ quadz08 wrote:generally speaking, if it's got part of the username in it, it's a bad title

this applies here

KHAN MAN

SleepyKrew · Post Post #3915 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:41 am

Oh that already came up
Yes Sass Menagerie please

shaft.ed · Post Post #3916 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:52 am

Full House

cause the billiard table wouldnt fit

quadz08 · Post Post #3917 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:49 pm

↑ zoraster wrote:
The Sass Menagerie
should be adopted already so we can rid ourselves of this argument.

100% agreed

MTD · Post Post #3918 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:56 pm

↑ zoraster wrote:
The Sass Menagerie
should be adopted already so we can rid ourselves of this argument.

~56% Agreed

Nobody Special · Post Post #3919 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:14 pm

I strongly and firmly feel that no Speakeasy titles should be allowed.

CooLDoG · Post Post #3920 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm

Nominate N for "Hello?"

Om of the Nom · Post Post #3921 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm

MTD · Post Post #3922 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm

↑ CooLDoG wrote:Nominate N for "Hello?"

3rd

tn5421 · Post Post #3923 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:44 pm

↑ MTD wrote:
↑ CooLDoG wrote:Nominate N for "Hello?"

3rd

4th i guess

EspeciallyTheLies · Post Post #3924 (ISO) » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:46 pm

Hahaha oh yes nth N's title