b/c of post like these. all you do is attack me and then follow with a question.
i have no intention of workign with people who like to be like that.
pedit: amish tell for him?
↑ Green Crayons wrote:Something about BBT's play didn't sit right with me from my read through. It's like he's trying too hard to be open about his reads. That's the best way I can put it.
For example, his shift on the beck/ika slot doesn't look genuine. BBT had a strong town read on beck the entire game. ika makes a few flippant posts D2, and BBT votes ika right out of the gate in D3. And from then on he's been just dumping all over ika to further support his ika vote.
↑ Double Trouble wrote:So you're saying if you chased the chicken it would be odd? You have veen pretty even keeled about this discussion.
VOTE: unvote[/unvote]
~Trouble
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:GC, are you going to elaborate further or is that it?
I feel I have made my position on the Ika slot more than clear.
↑ Green Crayons wrote:@Doctor Who:do any of the three sentences DT posted in Post 205 make sense to you?
↑ Perfect Chaos wrote:Not lynching:
Shos, Grey, Egg and Dr. Pants
Would be ok with lynching:
Ace, Beck, BBT
Unsure of:
Pro, Gerain, DT, Desp
Please someone kill:
Aronis
Vote Ace
↑ Doctor Who wrote:... but there are more than three sentences in that post?!?↑ Green Crayons wrote:@Doctor Who:do any of the three sentences DT posted in Post 205 make sense to you?
Were they claiming something?
↑ Dr Pants wrote:I personally think we should no lynch today, and this will be one of the few times I actually suggest this. Here's why:
a) Given how unfocused town currently is, no-lynching and possibly adding extra days to the game benefits town
b) Unless town magically shows up in the final minutes, scum has control of who gets lynched
c) The top suggested compromise is on Aronis, and is being led by one of my scum reads, so screw that
If anyone wants to try to convince me otherwise they are welcome to, I'll check in on the game before the end of the day
↑ Green Crayons wrote:↑ Doctor Who wrote:... but there are more than three sentences in that post?!?↑ Green Crayons wrote:@Doctor Who:do any of the three sentences DT posted in Post 205 make sense to you?
Were they claiming something?
I was talking about DT's three questions.