Hey, other head here.
With the RVS vote, I'm sorry, I wasn't totally aware of the non-RVS-ness... The two posts before me were gawking over a Dr. Horrible intro (AND I MEAN NO DISRESPECT TO THAT WONDERFUL SHOW), so I wasn't totally sold on the whole seriousness of the game (and therefore the out-of-RVS-ness... I suppose there was some conversation going on earlier in page 2... Whoops. It was an honest mistake, and I didn't think there would be consequences. Oh well. <sarcasm> I'm also personally very against llama abuse, so that might have part of it. </sarcasm>
↑ HypotheticalBassists wrote: ↑ Egg wrote:Hypo wrote:will provide reads after consulting duck
After....whaaaaaaat? Why?
Hypo wrote:Because my partner made an RVS vote outside of RVS
If you are town, why is this bad? Or more why is it a reason to unvote?
Hypo wrote: I don't think it should have been made
Why not?
1. Because he set up some doc for writing notes about the game and we haven't fully gone over how we're going to play this.
2. It's a reason to unvote because outside of RVS, I'd prefer not to have an RVS vote. That's all there is.
3. Because it wasn't RVS and there was enough information available to make a vote on someone based on reads.
For me, my vote is either explicitly for pressure or on the person I find scummiest. I unvoted because the vote didn't accurately display my thoughts on the game.
I guess what Dino said? I personally wouldn't have unvoted, but at the same time I have no real read on Boonskiies yet, so it's not like I'm going to revote him. I should clarify with the document I made. It's 90% organizational stuff, like keeping track of who voted who when -- no real analysis. The remaining 10% is for keeping my own thoughts straight (because I have a tendency to post very stupid things when I don't keep organized), not necessarily so that Dino can see. Regardless of what I talk about with him, if I think I have a valid point, I'm going to post about it.
@Istott, if you want to refer to us separately, we're both "he." Also I'm not totally getting how you're leaning scum. The not being able to get a read off of short posts sounds a tad like a cop-out, but I'm not getting it. (Oh wait you just mentioned that, didn't you?) Murder of Crows (and presumably Riddleton) did say it was a gut scumread, which makes you defending yourself feel little fishy, but at the same time it doesn't seem like you're 100% flailing to save yourself.
-Duck (I am a fan of parentheticals, btw, so if they are used it's probably me.)