↑ Paschendale wrote:Cupcake was asking TW leading questions in order to illicit specific responses to justify the switch.
Objection! Leading the witness! It's a tactic so common and so duplicitous that it is prohibited in a courtroom.
↑ KittyCupCake wrote:Please, quote one leading question. I can't wait to see this.
I have a feeling most judges wouldn't sustain that, which makes me think your initial "objection" was disingenuous; especially considering that, when asked to provide evidence for your claim, you just posted a paragraph about how you can't.↑ Paschendale wrote:It's not as simple as "look, this sentence is formed in such a way as to be cooperative rather than adversarial!" It's the tone of their whole exchange from 128 to 183, culminating in 208 and 211, giving TW a chance to make himself (it's basically all just House, right?) look reasonable, without bringing out anything resembling new information, and giving them a chance to agree. There's nothing probing or informative from anything they discussed, just a whole lot of nodding at each other and going "oh yes, that's just fine", despite the things they're talking about not actually being fine. CupCake offers no insight or real analysis, and TW offers nothing that wasn't obvious from his first few posts.
Even if this exchange isn't literally in the form of "and then he told you that he was going to shoot, didn't he?", it's still serving the same function and creating the same result as a more overt version.
BTW, I did get information from my discussion with TW: I learned a bit about what kind of player he is, how he thinks about the game, and what type of mindset and motivations I should expect/be looking for when reading him. -Which are all very useful things.
↑ Romitelli wrote:↑ KittyCupCake wrote:Iwouldn't have voted you for that one post, but I agree with the read she holds based on it.
This doesn't make any sense.
Her read is that I'mobvious scumfor my RVS posts. Why wouldn't you vote on someone you read as such?
I agree with her
Okay. But, I don't have an issue with your↑ Romitelli wrote:
What I'm addressing here is not the content of my posts, but my overall level of activity. The difficulty lies in being able to contribute alongside several experienced players with whom I have not played before. I hope to pick it up while the game progresses.
I can't speak for everyone else. I have
I agree.
Maybe. I'll need to see more first, though.↑ Shiny Hydreigon wrote:i can lynch aronis too
I'll help you out on this: there is no such thing as scum tells. Any action from one alignment is possible from the other in different circumstances. The trick to mafia is looking at "why?" -Why might a player do this as town; what town motivation is there? Why might they do it as scum; what scum motivation is there? Which makes more sense? And when in doubt, ask them "why." "Why" is the hardest question for scum, because they need not only to give an explanation that makes sense, but is consistent with the circumstances and evidence. If you ask "why" enough, scum start to slip. And it's far, far more reliable than looking down a generic checklist of scum tells (which any half-decent scum knows to avoid doing anyway).↑ Total Wreck wrote:Hell, one of the most frustrating things about this game is that every time I think I find a scum tell, I see town doing the same thing later on.
It's maddening.
I disagree with this entire list, especially the first two.↑ Shiny Hydreigon wrote:I could personally go for Wreck, and farside atm. maybe domo. thoughts?
Also, can someone explain what "WKing" means? -It's not an abbreviation I'm familiar with, and I don't see it in the wiki here.