Mini 1622: (Hilariously) Unbalanced Mafia [-Over-]

[mastin2]

Also, VC.

Nazarene - 2 (guille2015, Mathdino)

guille2015 - 2 (EddieFenix, Nazarene)

ProHawk - 1 (pirate mollie)
Mathdino - 1 (ProHawk)
DrippingGoofBall - 1 (ika)

Not Voting - 2 (DrippingGoofBall, eyestott)

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.

(As always, if I get enough people requesting his full role PM, I will post it, even though it is fairly self-explanatory.)

Mod I would like his full role PM

.

<<< I will require the majority of living players making this request--be it publicly or privately--in order to reveal the PM. >>>

[eyestott]

Ah, thanks for clearing that up.

[pirate mollie]

I don't crumb.

I already explained my pushes.

I'm not dealing with Giant-Baby-Mollie for the rest of the game.

I am not the 1 who is being a giant baby as in I am no the 1 running around saying town is doing a terrible job on d3 when 1 of the lynches were on scum. so you want me lynched cos you have decided you don't like me? lol

@ mastina - count me in for bulba's role pm altho guessing by your reaction it won't be all that informative. plz post it anyway tia.

<<< Got it.
Also, remember that this is for

Bulbazak's

role PM. If you want to see Voided's, that's a separate request that needs to be made. >>>

[Mathdino]

None of us are cops so I don't think it's too useful to look at Voided's.

[pirate mollie]

mastina can we see voided's too

[eyestott]

Can you go ahead and publicly post the Role PM, mastin? If not, message me it too.

[eyestott]

Nevermind, I saw your message at the top. I vote for public showing XD

[mastin2]

<<< Clarification: I will post the role PM publicly if there are enough votes for it.
The

votes themselves

are what can be public or private. (Silly English language and its ambiguities!) >>>

[pirate mollie]

vote for public showing

[EddieFenix]

Vote for Public showing of both roles

[ProHawk]

Sure, lets see em.

[Mathdino]

^That was the hammer for Bulba

This is the hammer for Voided:

Vote: Voided

[DrippingGoofball]

Agree with public showing of everything.

Now sheeping mathdino:

VOTE: Nazarene

[ika]

just cus i have been skimming though it:

i would say the game is easily breakable by mass claim and that hawk is just being stupid and playing suboptiomaly if hes town thinking that he has every answer

[ika]

show role PMs for all

save us some time

[ProHawk]

I dont have every answer, I am saying you don't and thinking you do is your downfall.

[ika]

I dont have every answer, I am saying you don't and thinking you do is your downfall.

me being a player who not only knows how to break setups but also creates them. i think i have enough knowledge to know when a set is broken and when its not.

but your right i dont have every answer, but that doesnt stop me from trying and shouldnt stop others from trying either. that approach you think is "correct" is wrong though i can say that much with jsut the current claims

[ProHawk]

Ika, just think about it for one second.

If scum have to PICK who to screw targets with and they know everyones role, how effective do you think the roles will be?

Show me one game. One game where you have broken the setup.

[ika]

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=58565

broke setup and abused the roles to make it impossible for scums to win

------

and your talking to a guy who almost always goes for: day 1 mass claim, done this offsite (massclaim and coridnate roles), makes thes very types of setups, and knows that an imbalanced game practicly calls for mass claim

look at our flips already scums lost a lawyer/talior, tell me why we should not be claiming when its obvious its multi-cop game

[ika]

http://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showthrea ... 3-Amnesiac

setup i made but overlooked the true power od doc/special ames role, game got immitetly broken

http://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showthrea ... 70-Stalked

game was broken by mass claim and cordinating roles. i was scum in there and you can clearly see that we did not benifit from it

[ProHawk]

Looks like that first game wasn't a closed setup, am I wrong?

[Mathdino]

I think in absence of Fenix fullclaiming, which isn't really necessary since he's an investigative and we can just tell him who to look at, it's ika's and mollie's turn to claim to the extent they desire.

Your turn, ika.

[ika]

Looks like that first game wasn't a closed setup, am I wrong?

thats besides the point?

I think in absence of Fenix fullclaiming, which isn't really necessary since he's an investigative and we can just tell him who to look at, it's ika's and mollie's turn to claim to the extent they desire.

Your turn, ika.

i want to stall it out to piss off everyone now (looks at hawk/eddie)

i want eddie to give out his results on who he checked (although i bet i know)

[EddieFenix]

Oh really, Ika? Do tell who I checked . Night 1 was OBVIOUS.

[ika]

well if we are following the iso of you: you would of most likely targeted dbg last night

my comp just crashed so im on wiiu and it sucks so im prob heading to sleep