↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Nacho? What do you think about eyestott. What do you think about his reads list from d1?
Eyestott still seems town to me, don't remember his reads list from D1 but lemme check.
↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Nacho? What do you think about eyestott. What do you think about his reads list from d1?
↑ Murder of Crows wrote:^ f and I have also been talking about that f16 post in skype.
↑ eyestott wrote:Okay then.
I'm for a mass claim, because that's what I think should happen, and that's where my strengths lie:
In Hilariously Unbalanced Mafia, I only really started being useful once everyone had claimed. Once that happened, I was much more efficient at questioning people, as Im much better talking about roles than I am at typical scumhunting.
I guess that makes me a late game player.
Anyways, IIRC, most of my usefulness in this game has been to do with roles.
Once Boonskies claimed, I was one of the big questioners of him.
I decided to call out yonces soft claiming by voting her.
I've just realised that I tend to gravitate towards role related questions over typical questions, so I'm all for a mass claim.
↑ eyestott wrote:I can sort of understand the reasoning behind F-16s statement, but I dont think it clears him.
I mean, its unlikely that AA9 would quit becuase of a scumbuddy IMO, but its possible. I seriously doubt it was fake anger, and if it was real, surely theyd have talked it out in private, considering the flip of encryptor.
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:↑ F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Why did you decide to list AA9 as null here when you said a lot of things about them, all of them indicating that you should be scumreading them?
I didn't have as solid a scumread on them as on you and I was convinced it was you + Yonce and maybe one of Mikuru, JesusBuddha, or Medea.
AA9 replacing out because GreyICE got on her nerves pretty much confirms me as town. I'm surprised you missed that and your lack of comment on it. Why?
This is a strange assertion.
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:
Well, not exactly.
It makes sense to me that when you give someone a "ray" aka a weapon that the person would then be able to use that weapon, whereas if you give them an "item" (a shield, a lightning rod, a deflector) that the item would start protecting them immediately. My real problem with the case is not that any of the reasoning is bad, but rather that I don't think Boonskies's actions come from any scum mindset at all + role makes sense based on how town power seems distributed so far and more inconsistency in already a very inconsistent ISO doesn't really scream scum to me.
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:↑ Murder of Crows wrote:^ f and I have also been talking about that f16 post in skype.
Where are you sitting on eyestott right now?
↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Ok I'm fine with eye for the present moment. I do really want to talk about antihero Today though.