Huh. This but in reverse. We've been talking and we may just jump to 4Tomatoes because the company is so sexy.
Pine, Icy, thoughts?
I <3 you too Farside.
↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:Do we really need to wait or can we just hammer Titus.
↑ Andrius wrote:Spurn not the Old Food Gods, and they will forget thee not, my son. Remember that the Great Smoked Halibut in the Sky sees your pain and will reward his loyal faithful sons.↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:For the night is dark and full of terror.
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:In the great Halibut's eyes, only the chosen may thrive.
↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:This mollie person has done nothing of significance in mafiascum history.
↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:Take note, Iecerint and Nacho are historically some of my closest allies and favorite players, and Pine has quickly reached the same status in the few games I've been with him this year.
↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:Gentlemen, let's be reasonable. Voting for me for being complimentary and expressing my approval of you is like feeding your dog when he's begging for food while you're eating. You're not reinforcing the behavior you want to elicit here.
↑ Southern Gothic wrote:
I am quite actually confused as to WHY you think she is scum!
cos I don't see how she is avoiding us when she is asking for tth. and I find it strange that you are saying that she is voting not trying to sort motivation when I think that albert's posts are way the fuck more indicative of that.
selective scumhunting is selective scumhunting.
↑ Southern Gothic wrote:I think Flames has a good chance of being scum.
Post 87, Post 90, and Post 92 all discuss forming reads from the first few pages, specifically Nacho's read on ABR and Andrius' read on Iecerint. On the surface it mimics the group dynamic in form and subject, but the questioning is awkward and stilted because it's very static. The contrarianism in the posts doesn't really leave anywhere for the conversation to go because Flames never bothers to talk about specifics or pinpoint whatexactproblems he has with the reads. As such, it's very unlikely these posts would elicit a productive response. There's also not much critical evaluation of the reads going on, evidenced by the fact he misstated Nacho's argument ("I don't find explaining something indicative of alignment."). This leads me to the conclusion that the posts are for the purpose of looking participatory and trying not to set off any alarm bells.
Could you please develop your scum read on Iecerint a little more, Flames?
I had to clarify something with the mod before I was comfortable posting. The flavor had thrown me off a little. This is not a crumb for anything.
Iece wrote:Me being the only one around makes some sense.
Iece wrote:The line that you focused on from PV is not something I had noticed, but you noticed it, so there might have been a reason for that. Your information here that it's a read you like could also explain you having noticed it. My thinking was that you might have been worried that someone would notice your scumfriend's error and tried to link it to another player (i.e., hence the oddly specific decision -- explained by you above as me being the only one around around -- to ask me about it and the decision to reveal that it was PereV indirectly).
peregrine wrote:I saw it as baiting you, asking about the behavior prior to pointing out the behavior.
gilgamesh wrote:Greetings, mongrels.
It seems the gods have decided that my duty is to grace you all with my presence in this laughable excuse for entertainment you call a "mafia game".
Very well. I shall allow you all to entertain me.
Gilgamesh wrote:Oh... I see. You claim to be a god of some kind. Only a mongrel would delude himself with such grandeur.