—Mini 1635— Curse of the Werewolves: Game Over

[Albert B. Rampage]

—

Skip to Next Vote Count

—

---

Nacho how come you didn't poison SG night 1?
p.edit

Vote: Titus

[Iecerint]

Titus full claim please. The thing sticking out the most to me right now is that Titus was the only one to say that SGs flavor was congruent to hers when SG was getting votes.

She actually reneged on that when pressed for like the 3rd or 4th time.

[Iecerint]

Don't lynch her until farside does whatever she wants to do with me.

Also, make Titus claim so that they use a fakeclaim.

[Andrius]

Second Titus fullclaiming

[Albert B. Rampage]

I see. Who did you target last night then? You should probably just tell us who's confirmed town, Nacho loverizes the non-confirmed, Andrius, farside, you and Nacho are already cleared, I think we got this one POE'd

[Iecerint]

I'm pretty sure I know what your odd favor is, though!

It might have to do with some stuff I've mentioned in recent posts a little bit!

Does that address your favor?

[Iecerint]

Yeah, I thought it was Victor/Titus going into today, maybe PereV as an alternate possibility. Not sure what makes farside confirmed, but I agree that she is pretty unlikely to be scum.

[farside22]

Well the manual was a bit fuzzy

[Albert B. Rampage]

Basically I think Who and Peregrine should be loverized, unless you cleared one of them, then it should be farside and non-cleared, and then we win tomorrow.

[farside22]

Also don't quick vote yet.
I have a few questions and thought to express.
Won't happen till Friday though

[Albert B. Rampage]

If Andrius was scum, making him a tree takes away his scum win condition?

Unvote

[Andrius]

If Andrius was scum, making him a tree takes away his scum win condition?

Unvote

Don't think that's how that works.

[Iecerint]

What about if Nacho announces a lover plan and I can veto it if it includes a confirmed town?

This way, I can keep it secret if Nacho guesses who I confirmed correctly, but there's still no risk of linking up confirmed town.

I doubt roleblocking Nacho will be an issue because Titus is probably the roleblocker. Outside chance that scum have both a roleblocker and something like a busdriver, but that's all.

[Iecerint]

I'm assuming that Nacho's ability triggers after Andy dies.

[Iecerint]

Well the manual was a bit fuzzy

I completely understand!

[Albert B. Rampage]

Are you OK with loverizing Who/Pere then?

[Iecerint]

I want to wait to hear Nacho's perspective.

[Albert B. Rampage]

k add me on hs

[Iecerint]

OK I did.

[Shadowmod]

—VOTE COUNT—

Titus

(1/5)

— Andrius,

Albert B. Rampage

Not Voting (8/9): All is Who, PeregrineV, farside22, VictorDeAngelo, Iecerint, Nachomamma8, Titus, Albert B. Rampage

With 9 players still alive, 5 votes are required for a lynch, 5 to force no lynch.

Day 2 deadline is (expired on 2015-02-01 18:00:00)

[Albert B. Rampage]

I unvoted

Fixed.

[Titus]

I'm a Food Trapper. I targeted ABR.

It would either block ABR or whoever targeted him. It's a one shot ability, hence why I didn't use it last night.

I didn't think anyone would target ABR, so it was a safebet as any. I can't just run around and ask, "Hey who are you going to target?". That's precisely why I knew ABR was Iecrint's target. I placed a trap onto ABR's front door.

The flavor is a bear trap designed to catch werewolves. As of last night, I thought ABR was the general misread of the group, reading him as town when he's scum, so blocking him was ideal.

[Titus]

Besides, if scum deliberately blocked you Iecrint, claiming it is pretty fucking stupid.

[Titus]

My role is essentially like a roleblocker or rolestopper so when Mollie claimed a regular role, I figured it made a lot of sense. *shrug* I was wrong, so I'm re-evaluating a bit.

[Iecerint]

Nope! Nice try.

Waiting on Nacho. Farside was gonna do something tomorrow (Friday).