Why do people dismiss Tier 2???
We need the doctors and the bodyguards...
BUY TIER 2
Also, maybe I haven't understood but everyone who bought a tier rolls for that specific tier right?
Damn if true we need more Tier 2, we need to hide the protective role
↑House wrote:And we won't necessarily get vig if we vote tier 3, so...
JK is also quite good.
↑kiwieagle wrote:Why do people dismiss Tier 2???
We need the doctors and the bodyguards...
BUY TIER 2
Also, maybe I haven't understood but everyone who bought a tier rolls for that specific tier right?
Damn if true we need more Tier 2, we need to hide the protective role
From what I understand it just goes to the person who has the highest roll. Regardless of what they voted for, it is up to what the town collectively votes for.
My question is that is it possible for scum to get the gear? Since it states randomly chosen based on a roll, does that mean an ungeared scum could get the item\power? Or did I miss something?
Also, vigilante always better than cop. Scum can mess with cop powers if they have abilities whereas there's something beautiful about that lone vigilante making a hard choice and taking someone down.
↑elusive wrote:My question is that is it possible for scum to get the gear? Since it states randomly chosen based on a roll, does that mean an ungeared scum could get the item\power? Or did I miss something?
I think they can, although I'm not sure. But given the odds, I think we just have to choose what's best for town either way.
↑elusive wrote:My question is that is it possible for scum to get the gear? Since it states randomly chosen based on a roll, does that mean an ungeared scum could get the item\power? Or did I miss something?
No, it will only go to an Ungeared Raider, which is pro-town.
↑killerjester wrote:When gear has been bought it will go to the Ungeared Raider with the highest-roll on a d100 loot system.
Scum might start with gear(raid bosses or something like that), or have a similar loot-buying system that takes place at night. The latter would have some interesting implications on scumhunting when you review someone's early behavior.
This is the greatest and best sig in the world... tribute.
↑elusive wrote:My question is that is it possible for scum to get the gear? Since it states randomly chosen based on a roll, does that mean an ungeared scum could get the item\power? Or did I miss something?
Also, vigilante always better than cop. Scum can mess with cop powers if they have abilities whereas there's something beautiful about that lone vigilante making a hard choice and taking someone down.
↑elusive wrote:My question is that is it possible for scum to get the gear? Since it states randomly chosen based on a roll, does that mean an ungeared scum could get the item\power? Or did I miss something?
No, it will only go to an Ungeared Raider, which is pro-town.
↑killerjester wrote:When gear has been bought it will go to the Ungeared Raider with the highest-roll on a d100 loot system.
Scum might start with gear(raid bosses or something like that), or have a similar loot-buying system that takes place at night. The latter would have some interesting implications on scumhunting when you review someone's early behavior.
Where do you get this idea?
Unless the mod specifically states scum can't get gear, that's a dangerous assumption to make.
We're all in the same "guild", so from the way I see it the gear could go to any one of us.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
vig is more likely to hit to than scum. I just feel as if town is better served with investigations early on.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
no but that's also a stupid question. Obviously 50/50 are better odds than 33% but the question is which kind of powers serve town the best.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
↑acryon wrote:
Well mod said we were all in the same guild, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to think even scum would be "ungeared raiders" that were scum-sided.
Alright, I obviously hadn't considered that, thanks to you and House for pointing it out.
This is the greatest and best sig in the world... tribute.
↑Nero Cain wrote:no but that's also a stupid question. Obviously 50/50 are better odds than 33% but the question is which kind of powers serve town the best.
That's not a stupid question. 50/50 odds might as well be a 0% chance if it's something you don't want. It's the probability combined with the power/usefulness of the role. It's a legitimate question.