↑TheCow wrote:Food for thought: would Mafia vote on a day one lynch, when they run the risk of being killed by the D1 Vengeance?
And I mean like
really
I saw that the first time, and meant to comment, but I forgot about it. This looks like newbscum trying to get a hint from town as to how they should vote to avoid suspicion. Probably would have been better asked in the scum PT instead.
Significant to reading TheCow, but I'm not sure if it was a slip (i.e. telling thecow they should have posted in their PT) or slinging mud ("looks like newbscum").
+ a small amount of scumpoints to texcat for an indirect defense. 507
+ a small amount of townpoints to cow, slimer, teapot. 518
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
In case it wasn't clear, I didn't realize Albert thought he had self-hammered. He had been talking about venge killing for days, I thought he was just threatening Sup.
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
I enjoyed my brief escapist fantasy of town-Albert, backed into a corner, pulling a scum lynch from the jaws of death with an awesomer-than-thou last possible second flash wagon, but this still needs to be the lynch.
I want TheCow tomorrow, and possibly pisskop.
I think in this there's a reason for the Vig shot. I really don't understand why that shot was fired.
↑Herodotus wrote:All of the above still applies; I think the person we lynch shouldn't kill either Teapot or Albert, but there is no more reason to be secretive about this strategy.
Going through your posts, I don't see what made you change your mind here. Is it the fact that Albert decided he wasn't going to kill you or...?
↑pisskop wrote:Quick. Check 'last visited' dates on profiles
its not guarentteed, but . . . Texcat last visited 0020.
Outside information... Useful, but is it inadmissible?
It's enough for me to think it's true, but who else did you look up as well? Or was that the only person you decided to check?
↑Herodotus wrote:@Sup: My concern is that you didn't say much to them or pressure them while they were around. So I don't understand the vote or how you were paying attention to Astinus.
I'll sheep vettrock.
UNVOTE: VOTE: Albert
Preview edit: threadsplosion and votes.
My vote is L-1
, including a self-vote.
I like the new ISO feature, but I keep clicking on posts to see them in context, then clicking on new ISO's, then new posts from those new ISO's. It's like that website that it's poor etiquette to link to. Trying to read Albert in ISO this happens even more because he tends not to quote or name the person he's talking to.
Scummy vote right here, lynch it with fire. I must apologise Albert, I was wrong.
Texcat's probaly a mislynch he's pushing, we'll see when he flips.
↑Herodotus wrote:In case it wasn't clear, I didn't realize Albert thought he had self-hammered. He had been talking about venge killing for days, I thought he was just threatening Sup.
You said in your post "Counting self vote", you're ****** lying.
↑Herodotus wrote:All of the above still applies; I think the person we lynch shouldn't kill either Teapot or Albert, but there is no more reason to be secretive about this strategy.
Going through your posts, I don't see what made you change your mind here. Is it the fact that Albert decided he wasn't going to kill you or...?
There is no contradiction. Before archaebob was killed, I was voting for Albert because I thought if he was town he might shoot someone other than Teapot, and if he was scum, hooray. He did shoot someone other than Teapot.
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
@theslimer3, I may have misunderstood your question. When I thought I was putting Albert at L-2, vettrock was starting to give me town-feelings, so after their vote I went back and read Albert in ISO. Nothing popped out but he seemed acceptable for a combination of: the possibility that he was scum, the information it might provide, and the above-average vengekill possibility. After I saw there was another vote on him, I almost deleted the vote from my post, but I counted the votes very carefully, and there were only five. When I saw that Albert had self-voted again, I decided I was sick of the WIFOM, so I put the vote back into my post with the warning about L-1. Only I thought it was going to take 7 votes to lynch, but it only took 6.
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
↑pisskop wrote:Quick. Check 'last visited' dates on profiles
its not guarentteed, but . . . Texcat last visited 0020.
Outside information... Useful, but is it inadmissible?
It's enough for me to think it's true, but who else did you look up as well? Or was that the only person you decided to check?
I checked everyone on pages 1, 2, 3.
Only other lead was Sup, and he logged in at 2330 and posted here. I also think Sup kinda scummy too.
Lets kill Texcat!
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
Also, how do you question the validity of it and then ask me for more?
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
↑pisskop wrote:I checked everyone on pages 1, 2, 3.
You may have missed Morgan. BBMolla was also logged in during that time but didn't have a post on page 1-3 for you to follow because replacement.
Slimer3, Albert, and vettrock I remember were all set to not reveal. I don't remember about theCow.
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
Teapot, how much have you thought about your vote? Have you reasoned out the idea of my being scum, or are you policy voting because I said Albert was at L-1 when that was not true?
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
↑Herodotus wrote:Are people just open 24/7 like texcat says she does?
Yea about her weaksauce statement . . .
Unless her computer logs her out of MS, reboots, then opens up her IE, navigates back to IE, and liogs her back in 10 minutes before a dayshot while it watches over her Im calling shenanigans.
Im imaging a cartoon cat sleeping while the glow of her comuter is sinisterly cast upon her face.
The computer conducted the dayshot! OooooooooO!
.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
