already done #28
93 states scum read reason based on meta. it is refuted shortly afterwards. 94 97
You pursue the read basing meta on just two games despite knowing there are claimed counter examples 95
You challenge Mollie to refute meta read based on examples of meta you chose 170
You are all aboard the basis of your meta read....
but you want me to explain....
I don't and didn't say, i had (real) problem about what you did
It was lack of curiosity, afterwards once it had been said in the thread that counter examples existed
and you bull headedly went ahead with but yes I have this example of titus being not chatty. (one example does not a meta make)
That was what piqued me.
VM, wants to claim
↑ Valkyrie Mollie wrote:I think far is scum.
VOTE: farside a trillion times over
reason being I think her read on titus is bs.
yet
also wants what is known in ye olde Aus vernacular as "A bob each way". (a bob is old money)
↑ Valkyrie Mollie wrote:if any1 wants help me convince guy that far is scum plz feel free to!!!
That is so bad I parodied the 194 offer here 218
So I will do you a deal.
if you stop double talking, I will stop responding to it.
You either think your meta read on Titus is still valid with the claimed counter examples or you dont. Say which clearly.
This post by VM
↑ Valkyrie Mollie wrote:youhavea really weird meta read on titus that is why I am sooper dooper sus of you.
Clearly is a claim they think you still