Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

Thor and Loki · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:35 am

↑ Mikazuki wrote:@Thorki Because he did not treat it like it's a problem? 592 suggests to me that he pretty much dismissed it as just a newbie move.

In the end, yeah. That's not necessarily the mindset he had when he saw it at first. He could have seen it as a possible scumslip and decided it was worth pursuing because it could have net definite scum.

Thor and Loki · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:35 am

↑ White Narcissus wrote:
↑ Thor and Loki wrote:it's impossible to be leaning town on a player which is a really bad view to have in 99% of the games on this site.

This is false, the only stance lufan had was notscience, which was a wishy-washy one, while everyone else seemed to think he had a scumread there, it was fairly obvious he had a wishy-washy stance just by adding the "but it could be in my head" thing.
In addition (to the generalized statement) A player who has posted only fluff, id agree it's impossible to have a townread/lean on.
So where are you getting this that's a bad view to believe it's impossible to have a town lean on a player in 99% of the games in the site?
~Sakura

Your view of his post being bad isn't the only acceptable one.

White Narcissus · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:37 am

↑ Mikazuki wrote:@Thorki Because he did not treat it like it's a problem? 592 suggests to me that he pretty much dismissed it as just a newbie move.

Interesting, how he was the one who brought that he was browsing the private topics, when we already knew he had but decided to not mention it on our push, and now it's defending his response as "how it could come from town". Now you see the benefit to not mentioning it way back then?
~Sakura

Thor and Loki · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:37 am

Whenever you believe that your view on a post is the only acceptable interpretation and everyone else who believes differently is not only wrong but also scum, you are making a bad call 99% of the time.

White Narcissus · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:38 am

↑ Thor and Loki wrote:Your view of his post being bad isn't the only acceptable one.

But the post being null is the most you can get out of it.

White Narcissus · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:38 am

~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:39 am

↑ Wisdom wrote:Btw Zel1nk bringing this up should not by any means earn him any points. Most likely he realized this is the secret I've been holding - or lufan himself realized it and told them in their PT - and he brought it up for cred. His defense when the wagon started to build up is still there, and makes him a very likely partner.

~Wis

^relevant

~Wis

Thor and Loki · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:39 am

↑ White Narcissus wrote:
↑ Thor and Loki wrote:Your view of his post being bad isn't the only acceptable one.

But the post being null is the most you can get out of it.

Also not true.

White Narcissus · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:44 am

↑ Thor and Loki wrote:
↑ White Narcissus wrote:
↑ Thor and Loki wrote:Your view of his post being bad isn't the only acceptable one.

But the post being null is the most you can get out of it.

Also not true.

Then explain why would a town player decide to not contribute at all to anything, then give a wishy washy stance on one person and then dissapear. I think Zelink's going waaay out of his way to give a townread there, waaay so much.... that it looks like he's protecting SOMEONE... enough to call it a bad wagon, and when the wagon was forming he decided to bring up the PT thing for towncred as Wis mentioned.
Unrelated to the discussed (how zelink got a townread there), but i also didnt like how lufan only came back after he started getting voted and started to do shit, Bettlejuicing much?.
~Sakura

Ankamius · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:55 am

↑ Mikazuki wrote:@Thorki I don't think it's scummy, I wonder why he would bring it up at all if he did not see it as a problem.

@Anka I already explained why I would choose him to policy lynch. When a policy lynch seems appropriate and my read could still go either way pending answers/most posts, I will consider PL as my main reason for voting.

I didn't ask why you'd choose him to policy lynch. I asked you what the justification for a policy lynch is.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:31 am

No time right now. But skimmed recent pages for pseudo-votes, didn't see any and figured I'd paste this here before I have to go.

[area=Naomi asked Seiko how she was so strong and brave and commented that she wanted to be more like Seiko. Seiko replied, "Don't worry... Just keep your head held high and you'll get the hang of it!"
I'm sorry... I couldn't help myself.]

Pseudo-Votecount 1.9

L-2 ->

lufan131 (6)

: Ankamius, White Narcissus, Witness Protection, Mikazuki, Loki and Thor, ZZZX

Loki and Thor (1)

: ZeL1nK2

Skold (1)

: SXTLHGaiden

ZeL1nK2 (1)

: Shadowcat

Witness Protection (1)

: Zymf

Shadowcat (1)

: notscience

Not Pseudo-Voting (3)

: lufan131, Skold, Taly

With 14 alive, it takes 8 to Pseudo-lynch. We're aiming for a lynch within (expired on 2015-04-03 14:00:00).

[/area]

Spoiler: PAST PSEUDO-VOTECOUNTS

White Narcissus · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:33 am

you missed zymf's switch

~Wis

White Narcissus · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:33 am

In 608

~Wis

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:36 am

Then L-1.

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:39 am

you mean "fake L-1"

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:42 am

honestly, i don't know why people aren't already voting.
unless you guys are paranoid about someone retracting their vote and thus make it more likely that other's darkness be increased.

Shadowcat · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:44 am

You can add our vote to that too.

White Narcissus · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:45 am

There have been around 44 hours since day begun (I think, someone re-check?). We need to lynch in the following 4 hours if we are to avoid the darkening occuring at the 48 hour mark.

VOTE: lufan

~Wis

White Narcissus · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:54 am

nevermind I miscounted there have been 48 hours already

~Wis

White Narcissus · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:55 am

Wis miscounted, but we already hit the number of votes in the pseudo votecount, also while im not opposed to waiting for a claim take in mind that 1) Scum will try to delay the lynch with the "wait for claim" excuse 2) Scum most likely have fake claims anyway, so I propose that we try to get that lynch in if he doesnt claim (or he claims and we dont like the claim) before the next darkening milestone.
~Sakura
PEdit: XPost.

White Narcissus · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:57 am

↑ Shadowcat wrote:You can add our vote to that too.

Still waiting for an explanation on Zelink and Nacho reads

~Wis

notscience · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:07 am

Huntress text Mala and tell her I am calling her names in the thread please, tia

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:07 am

Wait approximately ~12 hours for a claim. If no claim happens, just vote.

notscience · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:09 am

This wagon is shit.

Thor and Loki · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:17 am

Zelink, would you be willing to lynch Shadowcat with notscience and I?