↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:im speaking hypothetically
Well, Nacho is a slot I'm suspicious about right now but I'd like Empire to weigh in because he was townreading him last time we discussed the game.
↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:im speaking hypothetically
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:Why not Zar? Zar hasn't done anything vaguely townish. He's made a weak push on me, then disappeared.
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
vezok has made a mistake, he remembered the wrong player
carry on.
@ABR lol we couldnt even get a Hoopla lynch, it's not possible to lynch nacho today regardless
↑ GreyICE wrote:If Sotty returned for a last hurrah, it's very easy to think that she would select scum for it. Mith did it in the first team mafia, and he's the site's founder! That gives me a very good reason to believe that she would token scum, and LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it.
↑ ZZZX wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
vezok has made a mistake, he remembered the wrong player
carry on.
@ABR lol we couldnt even get a Hoopla lynch, it's not possible to lynch nacho today regardless
Metal if I sheep you on hoopla will you sheep me on kagami 2moro?
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:↑ ZZZX wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:Kagami wasn't in organic chemistry, I'm not sure what he's talking about.
vezok has made a mistake, he remembered the wrong player
carry on.
@ABR lol we couldnt even get a Hoopla lynch, it's not possible to lynch nacho today regardless
Metal if I sheep you on hoopla will you sheep me on kagami 2moro?
i dont sheep anybody sorry!!
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:↑ GreyICE wrote:If Sotty returned for a last hurrah, it's very easy to think that she would select scum for it. Mith did it in the first team mafia, and he's the site's founder! That gives me a very good reason to believe that she would token scum, and LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it.
Whoa whoa whoa stop here son. Just because somebody did something doesn't mean that another specific person would do the same thing. Slippery slope argument. Logic gap. Nonsense. Bad argument.
And even if you "think" that she would token scum (P.S: nobody in their right mind tokens scum in this setup),
"LLD's game (pre-remake) gives me a very good reason to believe those who token scum would get it."
is a terrible fallacy. This shit won't hold up in a debate argument. Even if the conclusion is true (I do not know), it is an objectively terrible argument. Objectively.
↑ GreyICE wrote:Mafia ain't a debate, son. If it's a debate, then the same players will always be lynched, because debating ability is utterly independent of any sort of objective truth. I've watched a creationist demolish a guy with a PhD in biology in a stand-up, on-camera, lots of prep time debate, trust me, debating is good only for the entertainment of people who enjoy watching debates.
Fact is, tokens are a damn good reason to look at someone hard. Replacing out from one specific game is a damn good reason to look at a slot hard.
Oh and debates? Debates are useless here. You should know that if you know anything about debates - you debate philosophy, not facts. You debate "what should abortion policy be" or "what's a good tax rate" not "Is water in fact wet" or "Can you burn a piece of wood in a normal atmosphere". Role PMs are facts. You get them at the start of the game. You'll never win over scum to the idea that their role PM is red, they know for a fact it is long before you start "debating" them. Wagons good, debates bad.