↑ ActionDan wrote:↑ fferyllt wrote:↑ ActionDan wrote:Ffery....
I don't understand, how could you even think to type something like this:
this feels like you're calling a personality thing scummy.
I have maybe said one thing relating to Espe's personality including both his tone of posting and his personal relations with other players... and that was calling his reachout to tammy patronizing.
As for your other criticisms I really don't appreciate them frankly.
Like this 1 out of the 2:
You agreed with espe's point that titus' reasons for townreading bulba were weak, but you turned it into an "espe is likelier scum" point.
The lesson was bad. So?
Actually I didn't agree with him. I stated as an aside that in general titus' stated reasons for townreading bulba would be weak for me: Replace Titus and Bulba with 2 people of your choice and the result would hold. But the finer point here is what he made of those reasons coming from titus' unique POV. They were used as an attack on Titus much more so than anything else, which is what I found scummy.
Oh the horror! and I was paraphrasing Nacho, how could it be?
I think even a deep and enlightening post about espe would ring a little hollow at this point. one case, on the player with the largest wagon, and then a fade with promises still on the table.
Oh come on. Why the mockery? If you're going to engage me, I expect you to do so with a little competence, especially with the call to rally the troops. I know this sounds stupid coming from me, but I think I deserve more than this.
I dunno it seemed a fitting response to "I don't know how you could even think to type something like that".
So, I think I've made it clear that stuff you've done this game has bothered me. I guess the only surprise (to you) is that when the mental weight on my team slacked off a little, our thoughts turned back to you.
