↑ pirate mollie wrote:↑ Alchemist21 wrote:I'm not saying reads can't change, but when the reason for the change doesn't make sense, I look at it. You have to look at the reasoning behind the pushes, see what motivation they might have. I've caught scum because they've tried crappy pushes, more recently I've caught some because they've tried forcing awkward Townreads, and once I even correctly ID'd a bus vote on a D1 scumflip and people thought I was crazy for thinking scum would have bussed.
Inconsistency doesn't simply mean a change; it means an unreasonable change.
I'm digressing here though. Let's save theory talk for post-game discussion. Why do you think MS is scum?
with this logic change, what makes wguerts scummier than metal?
cos I feel like metal's in thread behaviour is not town at all. he is doing the same thing as wguerts.
GI pointed out how wgeurts has stated reads on people he never even brought up before for no reason. The scum motivation there would be blending in if it's on a popular wagon, and defending a scumbuddy if they're in danger of getting lynched.
Then there's what I pointed out earlier on how wgeurts is treating his GI scumread. He keeps deviating from it to vote these other players, even when the Nacho plan had GI next in line, but he hasn't dropped that read, so why was he hesitant to lynch there? Either they're scum together (which now seems much less likely but still possible) and he didn't want GI lynched, or he wanted to score some extra mislynches before lynching GI.
What in thread behavior do you see from MS that's scummy? Ooba showed me his points, but it could easily be a case of MS being wrong Town. Tbh I haven't seen much of MS since I replaced in so my read there is still largely based on the 19-page-attempted-readthrough. If I'm missing anything important that would indicate scumMS please show me.
