My inference at the time was that your defense to the apparent discrepancy was that you were saying that the person you were referring to in that message was yourself. The wording is a reference the way that Clinton claimed he didn't lie about having sex with Monica Lewinsky. This is why I thought it:
shos wrote:yes, apart form myself obviously.
and it means that I did not see wisdom targetting me, and I *did* get a message, so it must have been a day action.
Bold added. It reads like you were saying that your comment D2 referred to you watching yourself N1, which sounds so utterly ridiculous that I pre-mocked it before that:
iec wrote:inb4 "Oh, I meant that I targeted myself."