↑You Got Schooled wrote:
I think our votes would have achieved much more had people been willing to wagon.
Agreed. Again, I was just waiting for the crazies to subside.
Who would you put a wagon on right now, and why? If it makes sense I'll help with some pressure.
↑Persivul wrote:
Game breaking is finding a method in which to break the game; i.e we don't actually have to scum hunt/play mafia (which funnily enough is why I join games) because there is an optimal way of playing that ends the game without actually doing anything.
Fair enough, I'm also here to play the game the way it's intended. I never understand why people try to scam video games and such. I won't post on it anymore, and really, I don't think there's a way to do it that doesn't benefit scum as much as town. Seems like the designer considered it when he made the setup.
Lol depends on who's talking. I seem to have an issue with reading one of them scum, but I know bbt loves his wagons from our last game. At this point im indifferent I guess. not going to label them one way or another.
Newbie - not so much. For example, in 72 he goes way overboard with the analysis:
It looks like scum knowing what ika will flip. If ika flips town, then lane can get town cred by not being on the lynch. If ika flips scum, then he can try and get town cred by saying he acknowledged that the lynch was solid.
↑lane0168 wrote:Persivul wasn't really wagon hopping as opposed to throwing around votes all willy nilly like, he kinda hoped on ika, then voted first for sthar8. Then voted you but that was first or second?
So I don't think that's really all that related. However, he's nowhere near my town list after a quick ISO since you posed the question.
He was 3rd on our wagon.
So that's 3rd on the ika wagon and 3rd on our wagon.
Can you clarify where our vote hopping is worse than this?
1) well instead of potshotting you could expand on why an empty read list is bad?
2) what feels right. i just looked at everyones interactions and stuff and deduct everyones roles from it
3) glad you agree its good
4) its not the scum hunting i see from him itshis mindset of trying to understand.
are we gonna start the wagon on me again now?
1) Your reads are almost the reverse of mine
2) Nah, better than that.
3) Not a town tell at all.
4) Town's job is to find scum. He isn't scum hunting, in fact, he isn't doing much at all.
I wouldn't mind a wagon you, but not toDay.
1) reversed reads =/= scum
2) well then you better start wagoning me cus the ohter reason i have is probally due to the fact i know his role right now based of his interactions
3) i never said ti was a towntell? i like to think that transparency is more town oriented then scum oriented
4) well neither am i? you know the saying "theres more then one way to skin a cat?" not every townie scum hunts. im town hunting right now so i can jsut POE push
2) well then you better start wagoning me cus the ohter reason i have is probally due to the fact i know his role right now based of his interactions
3) i never said ti was a towntell? i like to think that transparency is more town oriented then scum oriented
4) well neither am i? you know the saying "theres more then one way to skin a cat?" not every townie scum hunts. im town hunting right now so i can jsut POE push
im dissapoint you wont wagon me today
1) Correct, but your reads are so bad they can't be coming from town.
2) Why are you talking about a single person here? I want reasoning for all your reads.
3) Semantics. CBA.
4) OK, but you're still doing something. I also prefer to town hunt D1; Persivul is doing neither.
↑You Got Schooled wrote:1) Correct, but your reads are so bad they can't be coming from town.
2) Why are you talking about a single person here? I want reasoning for all your reads.
3) Semantics. CBA.
4) OK, but you're still doing something. I also prefer to town hunt D1; Persivul is doing neither.
1) they are bad cus they are not the same as your is what your saying right? do you understand how stupid that line of reasoning is and how wrong it is as well?
2) i already told you interactions. if you ahvent already realized its day fuckign 1 and 99% of the time on day 1 i go off gut calls and role reads.
3) *shrugs*
4) then we agree to disagree, if he gets wagoned heavy i will out the role i think he is cus its very mch follows a certain mindset that i see.
where bella? i rather talk to her then get into anothe petty smatic battle with you
But,
1) Not scum!
2) Because my partner is better at attracting the town-fairies than me
3)Someone without a gun? Right now, probably lane, but it's a bit early to tell.
↑You Got Schooled wrote:92 - Quick note on the attempt at game breaking; can we not do that?
Thanks.
↑You Got Schooled wrote:Game breaking is finding a method in which to break the game; i.e we don't actually have to scum hunt/play mafia (which funnily enough is why I join games) because there is an optimal way of playing that ends the game without actually doing anything.
This is anti-town posting: finding an optimal town strategy for night actions is not "breaking" the game. Particularly when there are potential issues with the optimal strategy that both BB and ika have pointed out.
This is also pro-scum posting: pushing against a strategy that optimizes a town's night action on the basis that it's somehow antithetical to the "core" of what mafia is. By this logic, town shouldn't use PRs because with PRs town "don't actually have to scum hunt/play mafia"
Vote stays.
Busy busy at work so only skimming, but this caught my attention and required a shout out.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
↑You Got Schooled wrote:92 - Quick note on the attempt at game breaking; can we not do that?
Thanks.
↑You Got Schooled wrote:Game breaking is finding a method in which to break the game; i.e we don't actually have to scum hunt/play mafia (which funnily enough is why I join games) because there is an optimal way of playing that ends the game without actually doing anything.
This is anti-town posting: finding an optimal town strategy for night actions is not "breaking" the game. Particularly when there are potential issues with the optimal strategy that both BB and ika have pointed out.
This is also pro-scum posting: pushing against a strategy that optimizes a town's night action on the basis that it's somehow antithetical to the "core" of what mafia is. By this logic, town shouldn't use PRs because with PRs town "don't actually have to scum hunt/play mafia"
Vote stays.
Busy busy at work so only skimming, but this caught my attention and required a shout out.
I feel the same. if ygs flips scum. You better lynch me next
Your response to everything is "this could theoretically apply to town and therefore this is not a Real Scum Suspicion."
Congrats, you're unhelpful.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Right now, probably lane, but it's a bit early to tell.
